선초(鮮初) 정치변혁과 정교(政敎) 이데올로기에 대한 연구: 정도전과 권근을 중심으로 = A Study on Political Change and Education of Early Yi Dynasty: Centered on Jung Do Jeoun and Kwan Keun

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This Study focus on the problem of Yi dynasty`s political education in radical political change(鮮初). The purpose of this dissertation is to analyse political education thought of the Sadaebu(士大夫) and investigate some suggestion in our political condition. This paper studied through hermeneutical-phenomenological method on concerned text. There are two paradigm on political education in early Yi dynasty. Two current existed in the Sadaebu`s political position and viewpoint. but each position and viewpoint on man and society has a same academism, that is, neo-confucianism(朱子性理學) which adapted as their own political philosophy. Each paradigm was named as Yi Saek(李穡)` order and Jung Do Jeoun(鄭道傳)`s order. Jung`s order asserted state-controlled education system and contents for national invest in the meaning of practical utility. On the contrary, Yi`s order asserted province-centered education system and curriculum. Jung`s political ideology for education based on the Hang San(恒産) which hold a prominent position to Hang Sim(恒心). According to his political idea and national concern, the purpose of national education is cultivating and selecting a person holding an administrative position for practical utility. On the contrary, according to Yi`s political ideology based theory of prominent Hang Sim(恒心), the imaginary manhood of national education was the cultivated man with moral, ethic, personalized humanism. The idea of Yi`s political education were individualism or personalism of education, and Jung`s propaganda were a kind nationalism, pragmatism of education. In spite of the two paradigm differed in their strategy for educational reform, they were the same position in that both pursued a political and socio-economical order based on neo-confucianism. Now, we acquired a lesson through critical analysis for the past political idea. That is, a power holder in socio-economical status may consider the conditions and values of national education which concerned with people` usual life.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 朱紅星, "한국철학사상사" 예문서원 1994

2 황의동, "한국의 유학사상" 서광사. 1995

3 윤사순, "한국의 성리학과 실학" 열음사. 1992

4 윤사순, "한국의 사상" 열음사 1993

5 윤사순, "한국유학사상론" 열음사 1992

6 손인수, "한국교육사상사 III-유교의 교육사상" 문음사. 1991

7 정세화, "한국교육고전의 이해" 양서원. 1997

8 Barnard,H.C., "프랑스혁명과 교육개혁" 삼지원. 1993

9 김영우, "최신 한국교육사 연구" 교육과학사. 1995

10 정성철, "조선철학사" 이성과 현실. 1998

11 김대용, "조선 초기 교육의 사회사적 연구" 한울 1994

12 정재걸, "조선 전기 교화연구" 서울대학교 1989

13 Aristoteles, "정치학" 삼성출판사. 1982

14 김재웅, "정치로부터 자유로운 교육" 원미사. 2001

15 도현철, "정도전의 사공학 수용과 정치사상" 한국사상사학회 (21) : 197-229, 2003

16 한영우, "정도전 사상의 연구" 서울대학교출판부. 1999

17 "입학도설"

18 황의동, "율곡의 우국경세사상" 사단법인 율곡학회 19-44, 2008

19 성균관대학교 유학과 교재편찬위원회, "유학사상"

20 "양촌집"

21 길기열, "야은의 생애와 사상" in: 야은 길재의 학문과 사상" 금오공대 선주문화연구소 61-88, 1994

22 "야은선생언행습유"

23 項久雨, "선진 시대 중국 유교 대표 인물의 정치가치관" 사단법인 율곡학회 45-58, 2008

24 "삼봉집"

25 "목은집"

26 "맹 자"

27 Fichte.J.G, "독일국민에게 고함" 삼성미술문화재단. 1981

28 "논 어"

29 최두식, "길야은론 in: 야은 길재의 학문과 사상" 금오공대 선주문화연구소 143-168, 1994

30 오인탁, "기독교교육" 종로서적 1986b

31 김인회, "교육사 교육철학 강의" 문음사. 1985

32 오천석, "교육논문선집" 광명출판사 1975

33 오인탁, "교육과 정치의 상호관계에 관한 연구"

34 이현두, "교육과 정치"

35 Apple,M, "교육과 이데올로기" 한길사. 1986

36 Apple,M., "교육과 권력" 한길사 1988

37 Sarup,M, "교육과 국가:그 정치경제학적 해부" 학민사. 1988

38 도현철, "고려말 사대부의 정치사상연구" 일조각. 1999

39 도현철, "고려 말기의 교화론과 생업안정론 : 이색과 정도전 계열 사대부의 恒産․恒心론을 중심으로" 한국사상사학 9 : 77-114, 1997

40 Fullan,M, "The Meaning of Educational Change" Teachers College Press. 1982

41 Warnock,M, "Schools of Thought" Faber & Faber 1977

42 Dale,R, "Schooling and the National Interest" Falmer Press. 1981

43 Karabel,J, "Power and Ideology in Education" Oxford University Press. 1977

44 Thompson,J.B, "Ideology and Modern Culture" Stanford University Press. 1990

45 Snelders,P, "Democracy,Schooling and Political Education" George Allen & Unwin. 1983

46 Skocpol,T, "Bringing the State Back In:Strategies of Analysis in Current Research" Cambridge University Press. 1985