RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Globalizing REITs: What International best Practices have Emerged?

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104983118

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Given the on-going globalization of REITs in recent years, this study aims to investigate two inter-related questions: what international best practices have emerged so far out of the global experience with the REITs systems; and, what policy implications do they bring to those countries that have a less well-functioning system such as those in Korea and others. By synthesizing the research findings as well as the institutional variations documented, the paper extracts a set of drivers for successfully launching and sustaining an active REITs system in a country. Those identified success factors in the demand-side (of liquidity) include: an “asset-light” business strategy on the part of large real estate holders, usually triggered by an economy-wide shock; the supply of high-quality properties that generate acceptable returns to the capital market; and, a credible business counterparty for REITs stock offerings. For the last one, a well-capitalized listed corporation with an internal management structure has emerged as the choice in the U.S., while some hybrid management structures - the sponsored-REITs and the stapled-REITs - are observed in other countries. In the supply-side, the discipline imposed by the capital market through disclosure requirements, monitoring, as well as M&A threat, works as a critical factor in nurturing a REITs system, which is often replaced by regulatory requirements (on such operational parameters as mandatory listing, maximum leverage, and extent of development activity) in the Asian and European countries where the systems are less seasoned. In the supervision side, discussed as key policy issues are how to strike a balance between the two classes of investors-institutions vs. individuals, what norms to be considered to help foster the ever-increasing REITs’ cross-border investments, among others. In sum, the case for REITs is strong globally given the on-going population aging and other favorable trends. Given the international best practices identified, the paper examines the Korean case in terms of their key implications and policy directions to pursue for establishing a more efficient and welfare-enhancing one in the country.
    번역하기

    Given the on-going globalization of REITs in recent years, this study aims to investigate two inter-related questions: what international best practices have emerged so far out of the global experience with the REITs systems; and, what policy implicat...

    Given the on-going globalization of REITs in recent years, this study aims to investigate two inter-related questions: what international best practices have emerged so far out of the global experience with the REITs systems; and, what policy implications do they bring to those countries that have a less well-functioning system such as those in Korea and others. By synthesizing the research findings as well as the institutional variations documented, the paper extracts a set of drivers for successfully launching and sustaining an active REITs system in a country. Those identified success factors in the demand-side (of liquidity) include: an “asset-light” business strategy on the part of large real estate holders, usually triggered by an economy-wide shock; the supply of high-quality properties that generate acceptable returns to the capital market; and, a credible business counterparty for REITs stock offerings. For the last one, a well-capitalized listed corporation with an internal management structure has emerged as the choice in the U.S., while some hybrid management structures - the sponsored-REITs and the stapled-REITs - are observed in other countries. In the supply-side, the discipline imposed by the capital market through disclosure requirements, monitoring, as well as M&A threat, works as a critical factor in nurturing a REITs system, which is often replaced by regulatory requirements (on such operational parameters as mandatory listing, maximum leverage, and extent of development activity) in the Asian and European countries where the systems are less seasoned. In the supervision side, discussed as key policy issues are how to strike a balance between the two classes of investors-institutions vs. individuals, what norms to be considered to help foster the ever-increasing REITs’ cross-border investments, among others. In sum, the case for REITs is strong globally given the on-going population aging and other favorable trends. Given the international best practices identified, the paper examines the Korean case in terms of their key implications and policy directions to pursue for establishing a more efficient and welfare-enhancing one in the country.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 국토교통부, "일반국민의 투자기회 확대를 위해 상장 리츠 육성한다"

    2 국토교통부, "리츠사업다각화 및 공모활성화, 국토교통부정책연구" 2015

    3 Linneman, P., "Understanding the Return Profiles of Real Estate Investment Vehicles" 2003

    4 Gyourko, J, "Understanding Commercial Real Estate: Just How Different from Housing Is It?" NBER 2009

    5 Ooi, J, "The Wealth Effects of Property Acquisitions: Evidence from Japanese and Singaporean REITs" 39 (39): 487-505, 2011

    6 Chen, D., "The Role of Sponsors and External Management on the Capital Structure of Asian-Pacific REITs: The Case of Australia, Japan, and Singapore" 2015

    7 Ooi, J., "The Growth of REIT Markets in Asia" 14 (14): 203-222, 2006

    8 Kim, K., "The Economies of Scale in Private and Public K-REITs" 2014

    9 KPMG, "Taxation of REITs: An Overview of the REIT Regimes in Europe, Asia, and the Americas"

    10 Chui, A., "Singapore REIT Market: Evolution & Key Success Factors" 2015

    1 국토교통부, "일반국민의 투자기회 확대를 위해 상장 리츠 육성한다"

    2 국토교통부, "리츠사업다각화 및 공모활성화, 국토교통부정책연구" 2015

    3 Linneman, P., "Understanding the Return Profiles of Real Estate Investment Vehicles" 2003

    4 Gyourko, J, "Understanding Commercial Real Estate: Just How Different from Housing Is It?" NBER 2009

    5 Ooi, J, "The Wealth Effects of Property Acquisitions: Evidence from Japanese and Singaporean REITs" 39 (39): 487-505, 2011

    6 Chen, D., "The Role of Sponsors and External Management on the Capital Structure of Asian-Pacific REITs: The Case of Australia, Japan, and Singapore" 2015

    7 Ooi, J., "The Growth of REIT Markets in Asia" 14 (14): 203-222, 2006

    8 Kim, K., "The Economies of Scale in Private and Public K-REITs" 2014

    9 KPMG, "Taxation of REITs: An Overview of the REIT Regimes in Europe, Asia, and the Americas"

    10 Chui, A., "Singapore REIT Market: Evolution & Key Success Factors" 2015

    11 Ling, D. C, "Returns and Information Transmission Dynamics in Public and Private Real Estate Markets" 2013

    12 Chan, S. H., "Real estate investment trusts: Structure, performance, and investment opportunities" Oxford University Press 2003

    13 Ambrose, B. W., "Real Estate and Economies of Scale: The Case of REITs" 33 (33): 323-350, 2005

    14 Cho, M, "REITs Market in Korea: Challenges & Enabling Factors" 2011

    15 Ambrose, B., "REIT organizational structure and operational Characteristics" 21 (21): 141-162, 2001

    16 Cheng, P, "REIT Characteristics and Predictability" 10 (10): 23-41, 2007

    17 Case, B., "Markov Switching Dynamics in REIT Returns:Univariate and Multivariate Evidence on Forecasting Performance" 42 (42): 2014

    18 Capozza, D, "Managerial Style and Firm Value" 26 (26): 1998

    19 Pavlov, A. D., "Macroeconomic Risk Factors and the Role of Mispriced Credit in the Returns from International Real Estate Securities" 2013

    20 Giacomini, E, "Leverage and Returns: A Cross-Country Analysis of Public Real Estate Markets" University of Florida 2015

    21 Capozza, D, "Inside Ownership, Risk Sharing and Tobin’s q-Ratios: Evidence from REITs" 31 (31): 2003

    22 Deng, Y., "Information Asymmetry and Organizational Structure"

    23 Harrison, D., "Further Evidence on the Capital Structure of REITs" 39 (39): 133-166, 2011

    24 Linneman, P., "Forces Changing the Real Estate Industry Forever" 1 : 1-12, 1997

    25 Linneman, P, "Forces Changing the Real Estate Forever: Five Years Later" 6 : 5-17, 2002

    26 Mori, M., "External Advisors, Business Groups, and Bank Relationships:Evidence of Synergetic Effects from Japanese Real Estate Investment Trusts" National University of Singapore 2014

    27 Wall Street Journal, "European REITs Are on a Tear"

    28 Graham, J., "Do Dividend Clienteles Exist? Evidence on Dividend Preferences of Retail Investors" 2006

    29 Miller, M., "Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares" 411-433, 1961

    30 An, H., "Corporate Transparency and Firm Growth: Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts" 39 (39): 429-454, 2011

    31 Bauer, R., "Corporate Governance and Performance: The REIT Effect" 38 (38): 1-29, 2010

    32 European Central Bank, "Commercial Property Markets: Financial Stability Risks, Recent Developments, and EU Banks’ Exposures"

    33 Lee, H., "Challenges in the REITs markets in Korea" KAREIT 2014

    34 Hardin, W, "Banking Relationships and REIT Capital Structure" 38 (38): 257-284, 2010

    35 Chan, S. H., "Are REIT IPOs Unique? The Global Evidence" 47 : 719-759, 2013

    36 Henderson, B., "An Empirical Analysis of Non-Traded REITs" Securities Litigation and Consulting Group, Inc 2015

    37 Packer, F., "A Global Tour of Commercial Property and REIT Markets" 17 (17): 241-274, 2014

    38 Lim, K. G, "(Ir)relevance of MM Propositions in Explaining Leverage Strategies of Real Estate Companies"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 학술지 통합 (기타)
    2008-03-28 학술지명변경 한글명 : 금융학회지 -> 금융연구
    외국어명 : Korean Journal of Money & Finance -> Journal of Money & Finance
    KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.57 0.57 0.64
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.61 0.62 1.431 0.06
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼