RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    모형적합도 검정을 통한 여행비용모형 추정에 관한 연구: 역사유산 관광자원을 중심으로 = Estimation of the Appropriate Travel Cost Model: A Diagnostic Analysis

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105023910

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to estimate the appropriate model of travel
    cost method using the diagnostic analysis. The travel cost model which was
    estimated through OLS method was transformed to fit with FGLS and AR(1)
    models. The researchers also estimate the consumer surplus of the historic
    heritage visitor resources, the Warwick Castle in UK, using zonal TCM and
    individual TCM. From the on-site survey, the results show the valuation
    using ITCM is significantly greater than ZTCM. In addition, the CS result
    proved that the original OLS model was different from the transformed model.
    In conclusion, writers indicate that selection of functional form of demand
    equations is important in estimating consumer surplus.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to estimate the appropriate model of travel cost method using the diagnostic analysis. The travel cost model which was estimated through OLS method was transformed to fit with FGLS and AR(1) models. The researchers also es...

    The purpose of this study is to estimate the appropriate model of travel
    cost method using the diagnostic analysis. The travel cost model which was
    estimated through OLS method was transformed to fit with FGLS and AR(1)
    models. The researchers also estimate the consumer surplus of the historic
    heritage visitor resources, the Warwick Castle in UK, using zonal TCM and
    individual TCM. From the on-site survey, the results show the valuation
    using ITCM is significantly greater than ZTCM. In addition, the CS result
    proved that the original OLS model was different from the transformed model.
    In conclusion, writers indicate that selection of functional form of demand
    equations is important in estimating consumer surplus.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "여행비용모형(TCM)을 이용한 관광자원의 수요분석" 22 (22): 113-133, 1999

    2 "관광자원 가치평가방법의 방법론적 고찰에 관한 연구" 20 (20): 115-133, 1997

    3 "Valuing nature with travel cost models" Edward Elgar Publishing 2000

    4 "Using isochrone surfaces in travel cost models" 5 (5): 117-126, 1997

    5 "Using econometrics: A practical guide" Addison Wesley Longman 2001

    6 "Tourism: Principles, Practices and Philosophies" John Wiley & Sons. 2000

    7 "The travel costmodel of recreation demand" 119-147, 1990

    8 "The travel cost demand model as anenvironmental policy assessment tool A review of literature WesternJournal of Agricultural Economics" 164-178, 1986

    9 "The lack of anexpected relationship between travel cost and contingent valueestimates of forest recreation value" 303-319, 1990

    10 "The economic value of Trinity River water" 15 (15): 309-322, 1999

    1 "여행비용모형(TCM)을 이용한 관광자원의 수요분석" 22 (22): 113-133, 1999

    2 "관광자원 가치평가방법의 방법론적 고찰에 관한 연구" 20 (20): 115-133, 1997

    3 "Valuing nature with travel cost models" Edward Elgar Publishing 2000

    4 "Using isochrone surfaces in travel cost models" 5 (5): 117-126, 1997

    5 "Using econometrics: A practical guide" Addison Wesley Longman 2001

    6 "Tourism: Principles, Practices and Philosophies" John Wiley & Sons. 2000

    7 "The travel costmodel of recreation demand" 119-147, 1990

    8 "The travel cost demand model as anenvironmental policy assessment tool A review of literature WesternJournal of Agricultural Economics" 164-178, 1986

    9 "The lack of anexpected relationship between travel cost and contingent valueestimates of forest recreation value" 303-319, 1990

    10 "The economic value of Trinity River water" 15 (15): 309-322, 1999

    11 "The Economics of tourism" Routledge 1997

    12 "The Economics of leisure and tourism" ButterworthHeinemann 1999

    13 "Sensitivity of whitewater rafting surplusto pecuniary travel cost specifications" 47 : 79-91, 1996

    14 "Measuring recreation benefitsof quality improvements with revealed and stated behaviour data" 22 : 339-354, 2000

    15 "Introductory econometrics" SouthWestern College Publishing 2000

    16 "Introduction to econometrics" John Wiley & Sons 2001

    17 "Heritage tourism: at what price?." 3 : 213-228, 1998

    18 "Functionalform and the statistical properties of welfare measures AmericanJournal of Agricultural Economics" 414-421, 1989

    19 "Estimating the benefits of lowflow alleviation in rivers The case of the Ticino River" 35 : 585-590, 2003

    20 "Essentials of econometrics" McGrawhill 1999

    21 "Economic valuation of the Chinook Salmon sport fishery of the Gulkana River, Alaska, under current and alternative management plans" 72 (72): 113-128, 1996

    22 "Economic benefits ofsport fishing and angler wildlife watching in Pennsylvania" 40 : 68-78, 2001

    23 "Econometric analysis" Prentice HallInternational 2003

    24 "Concepts and measures of the economic value ofenvironmental quality Journal of EnvironmentalManagement" 215-228, 1990

    25 "Biodiversity and the tourism value of Changbai mountain biosphere reserve, China: A travel cost approach" 6 (6): 335-357, 2000

    26 "Balancing culture heritage conservation and sustainable development through tourism" Gadjah Mada University Press 1997

    27 "A note on the use of travelcost models with unequal zonal populations" 400-407, 1982

    28 "A note on the functional form of travel cost models withunequal populations" 342-349, 1983

    29 "A Contingent trip model for estimating railtrail demand" 46 (46): 79-96, 2003

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.95 1.95 1.78
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.8 1.82 2.049 0.92
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼