RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      실과의 기술적 문제해결 과정에서 평가하기의 순환적 활동에 관한 탐색

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75238101

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The main goal of this study was to trace the evaluation function in technological problem solving process. This study fouced on : (1) identifying the process path of evaluation cycle, (2) identifying the conceptual constituents of evaluation (3) the formulation of designing space/making space/evaluation space model characterizing these cycles. 5 grade 6 students and 6 grade 4 students participated in the study. This study required the case study methods in data collection and analysis. The data collection methods were used the video recording, the interview, and the field notes of researcher. The students' performance procedures and thinking aloud were video recorded. The collected data were transcribed verbatim. Each students' performance was coded with respect to not only the participant's explicity stated intent but also the intent suggested one or more of their trials. Each student was provided with a copy of a design brief that described the technological problem to be solved. The problem was to construct the tallest possible tower. The results of this study were as follows: The results are presented in the order of the research questions given above.1) The evaluation recurred cyclically and become intertwined, until the student eventually decided that the task has been completed. Particularly, the movement between making space and evaluation space revealed the cyclical aspect. 2) The conceptual constituents of the evaluation space revealed an interesting variety of positions adopted by the students. 3) The model of the process performed by students was developed. The model offered a graphic representation of action-space. The evaluation space was included in the designing space and making space.
      번역하기

      The main goal of this study was to trace the evaluation function in technological problem solving process. This study fouced on : (1) identifying the process path of evaluation cycle, (2) identifying the conceptual constituents of evaluation (3) the f...

      The main goal of this study was to trace the evaluation function in technological problem solving process. This study fouced on : (1) identifying the process path of evaluation cycle, (2) identifying the conceptual constituents of evaluation (3) the formulation of designing space/making space/evaluation space model characterizing these cycles. 5 grade 6 students and 6 grade 4 students participated in the study. This study required the case study methods in data collection and analysis. The data collection methods were used the video recording, the interview, and the field notes of researcher. The students' performance procedures and thinking aloud were video recorded. The collected data were transcribed verbatim. Each students' performance was coded with respect to not only the participant's explicity stated intent but also the intent suggested one or more of their trials. Each student was provided with a copy of a design brief that described the technological problem to be solved. The problem was to construct the tallest possible tower. The results of this study were as follows: The results are presented in the order of the research questions given above.1) The evaluation recurred cyclically and become intertwined, until the student eventually decided that the task has been completed. Particularly, the movement between making space and evaluation space revealed the cyclical aspect. 2) The conceptual constituents of the evaluation space revealed an interesting variety of positions adopted by the students. 3) The model of the process performed by students was developed. The model offered a graphic representation of action-space. The evaluation space was included in the designing space and making space.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-04-12 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education -> Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education Research KCI등재
      2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2021-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.94 0.94 1.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.06 1.03 1.387 0.54
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼