RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      소리 자극 강도와 흉쇄유돌근의 수축의 변화에 따른전정유발근전위의 변화 = Changes of VEMP Responses by the Strength of SCM MusclesContraction and Stimulation Intensities

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101610137

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background and Objectives:The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the strength of SCM muscle contraction and
      the intensity of the sound stimulation on the VEMP parameters (amplitude, latency and threshold). Subjects and Method:
      Twenty normal subjects were included. Subjects pushed with their jaw against the hand-held inflated cuff to generate cuff pressures
      of 20, 40 and 60 mmHg and sequential stimulation intensities were applied. Variances of each parameter were analyzed.
      Results:There was no significant difference in terms of threshold according to the side and strength of SCM contraction. P1-N1
      amplitude demonstrated no significant differences according to the side;however, the amplitude increased significantly as the cuff
      pressure and stimulation intensity increased. Interaural amplitude difference ratios showed an increased difference at 20 mmHg
      when compared to those at 60 mmHg. There was neither a cuff pressure effect, nor stimulation intensity effect when considering the
      P1 latencies. As for the N1 values, there was no stimulation intensity effect but there was a delayed latency at 20 mmHg when compared
      to those at 40 or 60 mmHg. Interaural latency difference of N1 latencies did not differ significantly according to the cuff pressure;
      however, there was an increased difference at 20 mmHg when compared to those at 40 or 60 mmHg. Conclusion:This study
      shows that VEMP response is influenced by the cuff pressure and stimulation intensity, and we recommend to get each VEMP
      parameter using this feedback method in the clinical setting. (Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2007;50:579-83)
      번역하기

      Background and Objectives:The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the strength of SCM muscle contraction and the intensity of the sound stimulation on the VEMP parameters (amplitude, latency and threshold). Subjects and Method: Twen...

      Background and Objectives:The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the strength of SCM muscle contraction and
      the intensity of the sound stimulation on the VEMP parameters (amplitude, latency and threshold). Subjects and Method:
      Twenty normal subjects were included. Subjects pushed with their jaw against the hand-held inflated cuff to generate cuff pressures
      of 20, 40 and 60 mmHg and sequential stimulation intensities were applied. Variances of each parameter were analyzed.
      Results:There was no significant difference in terms of threshold according to the side and strength of SCM contraction. P1-N1
      amplitude demonstrated no significant differences according to the side;however, the amplitude increased significantly as the cuff
      pressure and stimulation intensity increased. Interaural amplitude difference ratios showed an increased difference at 20 mmHg
      when compared to those at 60 mmHg. There was neither a cuff pressure effect, nor stimulation intensity effect when considering the
      P1 latencies. As for the N1 values, there was no stimulation intensity effect but there was a delayed latency at 20 mmHg when compared
      to those at 40 or 60 mmHg. Interaural latency difference of N1 latencies did not differ significantly according to the cuff pressure;
      however, there was an increased difference at 20 mmHg when compared to those at 40 or 60 mmHg. Conclusion:This study
      shows that VEMP response is influenced by the cuff pressure and stimulation intensity, and we recommend to get each VEMP
      parameter using this feedback method in the clinical setting. (Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2007;50:579-83)

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Vestibulocollic reflexes: Normal values and the effect of age" 112 (112): 1971-1979, 2001

      2 "Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials" 24 (24): 3-8, 1995

      3 "Variance of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials" 111 (111): 522-527, 2001

      4 "Validity of a new feedback method for the VEMP test" 126 (126): 796-800, 2006

      5 "The influence of voluntary EMG activity and click intensity on the vestibular click evoked myogenic potential" 18 (18): 1210-1213, 1995

      6 "The influence of clicks versus short tone bursts on the vestibular evoked myogenic potentials" 24 (24): 195-197, 2003

      7 "Sound-evoked activity in primary afferent neurons of a mammalian vestibular system" 18 (18): 355-360, 1997

      8 "Improving the VEM Preliability by using a blood pressure manometer" 116 (116): 131-135, 2006

      9 "Characteristics of tone burst-evoked myogenic potentials in the sternocleidomastoid muscles" 22 (22): 796-802, 2001

      10 "Augmentation of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: An indication for distended saccular hydrops" 112 (112): 509-512, 2002

      1 "Vestibulocollic reflexes: Normal values and the effect of age" 112 (112): 1971-1979, 2001

      2 "Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials" 24 (24): 3-8, 1995

      3 "Variance of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials" 111 (111): 522-527, 2001

      4 "Validity of a new feedback method for the VEMP test" 126 (126): 796-800, 2006

      5 "The influence of voluntary EMG activity and click intensity on the vestibular click evoked myogenic potential" 18 (18): 1210-1213, 1995

      6 "The influence of clicks versus short tone bursts on the vestibular evoked myogenic potentials" 24 (24): 195-197, 2003

      7 "Sound-evoked activity in primary afferent neurons of a mammalian vestibular system" 18 (18): 355-360, 1997

      8 "Improving the VEM Preliability by using a blood pressure manometer" 116 (116): 131-135, 2006

      9 "Characteristics of tone burst-evoked myogenic potentials in the sternocleidomastoid muscles" 22 (22): 796-802, 2001

      10 "Augmentation of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: An indication for distended saccular hydrops" 112 (112): 509-512, 2002

      11 "Age-related changes in the vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials" 129 (129): 655-659, 2003

      12 "Absent vestibular myogenic potentials in vestibular neuritis. An indicator of inferior vestibular nerve involvement?" 122 (122): 845-848, 1996

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼