RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      첨성대 옛 기록의 분석

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104526495

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      More than a dozen different hypotheses exist for the nature of Cheomseongdae, a stone structure built in the former SIlla Dynasty capital of Gyeongju 1364 years ago. The true meaning of the structure is still vague after four rounds of academic debate in 1973, 1974, 1981, and 2009. The number of conflicting hypotheses grew due to the different paradigms adopted by scholars from a variety of fields and a tendency developed among researchers not to criticize other's hypothesis. The tendency emerged after a series of brutal debates in 1970s and 1980s among researchers who believed the structure to be a celestial observatory, a religious altar, or a tower symbolizing scientific knowledge. Historians participated in the debates far less enthusiastically, as the first three debates had been sponsored by the science community.
      Many researchers have claimed that historical records on Cheomseongdae are scarce. Such a prejudgment precluded a through examination of the records. This paper examined some of the records and reached the following conclusions.
      First, Samguk Yusa, a 13th century historical text, has a hidden message indicating that Cheomseongdae was related to the death of Queen Seondeok, who reigned from 632 till 647. This finding is consistent with the 15th century historical text Samguk Sajeolyo, which states that the structure was completed on a day close to Queen Seondeok’s death.
      Second, an editor of Dongguk Yeoji Seungram, a 15th century text, stated that Cheomseongdae was a Buddhist pagoda and that allowing Queen Seondeok to build the pagoda was a fatal mistake for Silla. The author of Geumo Sinhwa, the first novel in Korea written in the 15th century, stated that Queen Seondeok led to the perishment of Silla Dynasty because she provided a foundation for Esoteric Buddhism to flourish in Silla. It is evident that Cheomseongdae was a Buddhist pagoda related to esoteric practices. This reinforces my assertion made in 2009 that Esoteric Buddhist monks built Cheomseongdae to send Queen Seondek's soul to Trāyastriṃśa and wish to return to Silla in her next life as a Chakravartin, or a divine earthly ruler.
      Third, it is very likely that Kim, Busik (1075~1151) determined not to record Cheomseongdae in Samguk Sagi, a 12th century text, for which he served as the chief editor, because he knew that it was built by Esoteric Buddhist monks. In 1136, Kim, Busik suppressed a military coup led by an esoteric monk named Myocheong. Samguk Sagi was written between 1142 and 1145. Kim, Busik knew the risks of allowing esoteric monks to get involved in political matters and did not record in his book any esoteric Buddhist practices during the Three Kingdom period.
      번역하기

      More than a dozen different hypotheses exist for the nature of Cheomseongdae, a stone structure built in the former SIlla Dynasty capital of Gyeongju 1364 years ago. The true meaning of the structure is still vague after four rounds of academic debate...

      More than a dozen different hypotheses exist for the nature of Cheomseongdae, a stone structure built in the former SIlla Dynasty capital of Gyeongju 1364 years ago. The true meaning of the structure is still vague after four rounds of academic debate in 1973, 1974, 1981, and 2009. The number of conflicting hypotheses grew due to the different paradigms adopted by scholars from a variety of fields and a tendency developed among researchers not to criticize other's hypothesis. The tendency emerged after a series of brutal debates in 1970s and 1980s among researchers who believed the structure to be a celestial observatory, a religious altar, or a tower symbolizing scientific knowledge. Historians participated in the debates far less enthusiastically, as the first three debates had been sponsored by the science community.
      Many researchers have claimed that historical records on Cheomseongdae are scarce. Such a prejudgment precluded a through examination of the records. This paper examined some of the records and reached the following conclusions.
      First, Samguk Yusa, a 13th century historical text, has a hidden message indicating that Cheomseongdae was related to the death of Queen Seondeok, who reigned from 632 till 647. This finding is consistent with the 15th century historical text Samguk Sajeolyo, which states that the structure was completed on a day close to Queen Seondeok’s death.
      Second, an editor of Dongguk Yeoji Seungram, a 15th century text, stated that Cheomseongdae was a Buddhist pagoda and that allowing Queen Seondeok to build the pagoda was a fatal mistake for Silla. The author of Geumo Sinhwa, the first novel in Korea written in the 15th century, stated that Queen Seondeok led to the perishment of Silla Dynasty because she provided a foundation for Esoteric Buddhism to flourish in Silla. It is evident that Cheomseongdae was a Buddhist pagoda related to esoteric practices. This reinforces my assertion made in 2009 that Esoteric Buddhist monks built Cheomseongdae to send Queen Seondek's soul to Trāyastriṃśa and wish to return to Silla in her next life as a Chakravartin, or a divine earthly ruler.
      Third, it is very likely that Kim, Busik (1075~1151) determined not to record Cheomseongdae in Samguk Sagi, a 12th century text, for which he served as the chief editor, because he knew that it was built by Esoteric Buddhist monks. In 1136, Kim, Busik suppressed a military coup led by an esoteric monk named Myocheong. Samguk Sagi was written between 1142 and 1145. Kim, Busik knew the risks of allowing esoteric monks to get involved in political matters and did not record in his book any esoteric Buddhist practices during the Three Kingdom period.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 송재소, "?畢齋 金宗直 문학 연구의 몇 가지 문제" 대동문화연구원 44 : 181-206, 2003

      2 유영옥, "?東國通鑑? 體裁 분석" 부경역사연구소 (11) : 75-108, 2002

      3 "麟角寺普覺國師碑"

      4 구만옥, "한국 전통과학사 연구 - 심화를 위한 다양한 모색 -" 역사학회 207 : 273-294, 2010

      5 장활식, "통일신라 출범기의 봉성사와 망덕사 창건목적" 신라문화연구소 37 : 51-90, 2011

      6 김일권, "첨성대의 靈臺적 독법과 신라 왕경의 三雍제도 관점" 신라사학회 18 : 5-31, 2010

      7 김기협, "첨성대의 천변관측 기능" 3 (3): 1981

      8 조세환, "첨성대의 경관인식론적 해석" 26 : 1998

      9 박성래, "첨성대에 대하여" 2 (2): 1980

      10 남천우, "첨성대에 관한 제설의 검토" 64 : 1974

      1 송재소, "?畢齋 金宗直 문학 연구의 몇 가지 문제" 대동문화연구원 44 : 181-206, 2003

      2 유영옥, "?東國通鑑? 體裁 분석" 부경역사연구소 (11) : 75-108, 2002

      3 "麟角寺普覺國師碑"

      4 구만옥, "한국 전통과학사 연구 - 심화를 위한 다양한 모색 -" 역사학회 207 : 273-294, 2010

      5 장활식, "통일신라 출범기의 봉성사와 망덕사 창건목적" 신라문화연구소 37 : 51-90, 2011

      6 김일권, "첨성대의 靈臺적 독법과 신라 왕경의 三雍제도 관점" 신라사학회 18 : 5-31, 2010

      7 김기협, "첨성대의 천변관측 기능" 3 (3): 1981

      8 조세환, "첨성대의 경관인식론적 해석" 26 : 1998

      9 박성래, "첨성대에 대하여" 2 (2): 1980

      10 남천우, "첨성대에 관한 제설의 검토" 64 : 1974

      11 이문규, "첨성대를 어떻게 볼 것인가" 한국과학사학회 26 (26): 3-28, 2004

      12 장윤성, "첨성대 회위정(囬囲井) 가설" 한국고대사학회 54 (54): 463-502, 2009

      13 김재관, "첨성대 토론 유감" 3 (3): 1981

      14 남천우, "첨성대 異說의 원인" 9 (9): 1987

      15 김용운, "첨성대 小考" 64 : 1974

      16 이용범, "첨성대 存疑" 38 : 1974

      17 민영규, "첨성대 偶得" 3 (3): 1981

      18 김기홍, "천년의 왕국 신라" 창작과 비평사 2000

      19 정두희, "조선초기 지리지의 편찬(I)" 69 : 1976

      20 박창범, "전통시대 천문현상 관측대로서의 첨성대의 특징과 영향" KAIST 2009

      21 강영경, "신라 선덕왕의 지기삼사에 대한 일고찰" 8 : 1990

      22 이인철, "신라 상대의 불사조영과 그 사회․경제적 기반" 52 : 1999

      23 최종석, "신라 미륵신앙과 첨성대" 보조사상연구원 27 : 191-230, 2007

      24 강재철, "선덕여왕지기삼사조 설화의 연구" 21 : 1991

      25 이기동, "선덕여왕의 시대 - 첨성대 논쟁에 덧붙여서" 3 (3): 1981

      26 정연식, "선덕여왕과 성조(聖祖)의 탄생, 첨성대" 한국역사연구회 74 : 299-389, 2009

      27 이기백, "삼국유사의 사학사적 의의" 36 : 1973

      28 김상현, "삼국유사에 나타난 일연의 불교사관" 20 : 1978

      29 이근직, "삼국유사 왕력의 편찬성격과 시기" 101 : 1998

      30 신종원, "삼국유사 선덕왕지기삼사조의 몇 가지 문제" 17 : 1996

      31 이기백, "삼국유사 기이편의 고찰" 1 : 1984

      32 정구복, "삼국사절요에 대한 史學史的 고찰" 18 : 1975

      33 이강래, "삼국사기의 성격" 82 : 2001

      34 서영대, "삼국사기와 원시종교" 105 : 1985

      35 전상운, "삼국 및 통일신라시대의 天文義器" 3 : 1964

      36 서인원, "동국여지승람의 편찬자와 수찬자 분석" 13 : 1999

      37 정구복, "김부식의 생애와 업적" 24 (24): 2001

      38 김영주, "공론권(公論圈)으로서의 첨성대(瞻星臺) 연구" 한국지역언론학회 7 (7): 47-77, 2007

      39 김창현, "고려의 운수관과 도읍경영" 고려사학회 15 : 1-44, 2003

      40 여운필, "고려시대 문인과 승려" 파미르 2007

      41 김당택, "고려 인종조의 서경천도․칭제건원․금국정벌론과 김부식의삼국사기 편찬" 170 : 2001

      42 국립문화재연구소, "경주 첨성대 실측 훼손도평가 조사보고서" 2009

      43 "高麗國 義興華山 曹溪宗麟角寺迦智山 下 普覺國尊碑文"

      44 "高麗史節要"

      45 "高麗史"

      46 "退憂堂集"

      47 "謹齋集"

      48 "舊唐書"

      49 "自著(兪漢雋)"

      50 "燃藜室記述"

      51 "梅溪集"

      52 "林白湖集"

      53 "東文選"

      54 "東國通鑑"

      55 "東史綱目"

      56 전덕재, "東京雜記의 편찬과 그 내용" 19 : 2001

      57 "東京雜記"

      58 "書經"

      59 "新增東國輿地勝覽"

      60 "文宗實錄"

      61 "承政院日記"

      62 "慶尙道地理志·慶尙道續撰地理誌"

      63 "崔祐甫墓誌銘"

      64 "宣和奉使高麗圖經"

      65 "太宗實錄"

      66 정광수, "增訂文獻備考의 藝文考 연구" 5․6 : 1990

      67 "增補文獻備考"

      68 "圃隱集"

      69 "四佳集"

      70 (김창룡)金昌龍, "善德女王과 牡丹故事 攷" 한국어문교육연구회 35 (35): 311-336, 2007

      71 "唐會要"

      72 "佔畢 齋集"

      73 "世宗實錄"

      74 남동신, "三國遺事의 史書로서의 特性" 불교학연구회 16 : 45-70, 2007

      75 "三國遺事"

      76 "三國史記"

      77 "三國史節要"

      78 염중섭, "〈善德王知幾三事〉중 第3事 고찰" 한국사학회 91 (91): 49-92, 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2020-04-20 통합 KCI등재
      2020-04-01 학회명변경 영문명 : The Center of Research for Silla Culture Dongguk University -> The Research Institute for Silla Culture of Dongguk University KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.73 0.73 0.67
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.62 0.69 1.45 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼