RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    스마트 환경 하에서 근로관계의 법적 문제점스마트워크 가이드라인의 검토를 중심으로 = Application of Labour Law for Smartwork(Telework)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99968453

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently, working outside of workplaces is spreading widely around the world; using internet as well as various mobile devices makes it possible. For this measurement, Korean government named this situation as ‘Smart Work’ which once was called Telework. In 2011, the government made ‘the Guideline for the applications of labour laws on Smart Work’(hereafter ‘smart work guideline’ or only ‘guideline’). As for the definition of smart work, the guideline depends on two factors in the way most countries define telework: technical factor of using data communication equipment, and locational factor considering that it is beyond the boundary of main workplace. In the view of regulating working conditions of smart-workers, smart work guideline mainly depends on ‘2008 Telecommuting guideline’ introduced by Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Although the system and contents might look like similar, smart guideline has differences in some aspects. ‘Framework Convention on Telework’ of EU as well as ‘Agreement on data processing in 2005’ of France stresses on voluntary charter of telework, equal treatment of teleworkers in working conditions and vocational training. Protection of workers’ privacy and collective rights of teleworkers are also highlighted. According to foreign criteria of labour standards, partial amendment or complementary measures should be set, such as following: specification of the protection of collective rights, detailed or elaborated regulations on night shift and holiday work, elimination of unnecessary regulations of Occupational Safety and Health Act as well as job-related accident, reinforcement of the regulations to secure the voluntariness, equal treatments for teleworkers and foundation of the regulations concerned with protection of privacy as well as personal information.
    번역하기

    Recently, working outside of workplaces is spreading widely around the world; using internet as well as various mobile devices makes it possible. For this measurement, Korean government named this situation as ‘Smart Work’ which once was called Te...

    Recently, working outside of workplaces is spreading widely around the world; using internet as well as various mobile devices makes it possible. For this measurement, Korean government named this situation as ‘Smart Work’ which once was called Telework. In 2011, the government made ‘the Guideline for the applications of labour laws on Smart Work’(hereafter ‘smart work guideline’ or only ‘guideline’). As for the definition of smart work, the guideline depends on two factors in the way most countries define telework: technical factor of using data communication equipment, and locational factor considering that it is beyond the boundary of main workplace. In the view of regulating working conditions of smart-workers, smart work guideline mainly depends on ‘2008 Telecommuting guideline’ introduced by Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Although the system and contents might look like similar, smart guideline has differences in some aspects. ‘Framework Convention on Telework’ of EU as well as ‘Agreement on data processing in 2005’ of France stresses on voluntary charter of telework, equal treatment of teleworkers in working conditions and vocational training. Protection of workers’ privacy and collective rights of teleworkers are also highlighted. According to foreign criteria of labour standards, partial amendment or complementary measures should be set, such as following: specification of the protection of collective rights, detailed or elaborated regulations on night shift and holiday work, elimination of unnecessary regulations of Occupational Safety and Health Act as well as job-related accident, reinforcement of the regulations to secure the voluntariness, equal treatments for teleworkers and foundation of the regulations concerned with protection of privacy as well as personal information.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 ILO, "「Telework」(Conditions of Work Digest vol 9-1.)"

    2 박지순, "텔레워크의 의의와 노동법적 기본문제" 법무부 2004

    3 과학동아 편집부, "정보통신과 신소재" 동아사이언스 2012

    4 강성태, "재택근무 근로자(Teleworker)의 활성화와 노동법의 과제" 명성사 2002

    5 이승길, "재택근로자의 노동법적 지위"

    6 안주엽, "유비커터스 시대의 노동"

    7 최두진, "유비커터스 사회의 지식, 참여 그리고 생활"

    8 이희성, "원격근무와 근로자보호" 한양법학회 (36) : 51-76, 2011

    9 삼성경제연구소, "스마트폰이 열어가는 미래" (741) : 2012

    10 박지순, "스마트워크에 관한 주요국의 노동관계법 체계 및 노동관계법상 쟁점 연구" 고용노동부 2010

    1 ILO, "「Telework」(Conditions of Work Digest vol 9-1.)"

    2 박지순, "텔레워크의 의의와 노동법적 기본문제" 법무부 2004

    3 과학동아 편집부, "정보통신과 신소재" 동아사이언스 2012

    4 강성태, "재택근무 근로자(Teleworker)의 활성화와 노동법의 과제" 명성사 2002

    5 이승길, "재택근로자의 노동법적 지위"

    6 안주엽, "유비커터스 시대의 노동"

    7 최두진, "유비커터스 사회의 지식, 참여 그리고 생활"

    8 이희성, "원격근무와 근로자보호" 한양법학회 (36) : 51-76, 2011

    9 삼성경제연구소, "스마트폰이 열어가는 미래" (741) : 2012

    10 박지순, "스마트워크에 관한 주요국의 노동관계법 체계 및 노동관계법상 쟁점 연구" 고용노동부 2010

    11 Thomas D.Harnish, "미국, 캐나다, 영국의 원격근로" 한국노동연구원 2011

    12 유성재, "노동환경의 변화와 입법정책" 44 (44): 2007

    13 김소영, "고용형태 다양화와 법제도 개선과제" 한국노동연구원 2001

    14 박제성, "가내근로자 실태조사 및 법적 보호방안 검토" 노동부 2008

    15 김소영, "가내근로의 실태와 제도적 보호에 관한 연구" 한국노동연구원 1997

    16 강성태, "가내근로와 통신근로의 노동법적 규율" 서울대노동법연구회 (8) : 1999

    17 노상헌, "가내근로에 관한 법제개선방안" 한국법제연구원 2003

    18 "テレワーク白書 2009" 社團法人日本テレワーク協會 2010

    19 "http://www.mospa.go.kr/frt/sub/popup/pop_print/screen.do"

    20 "http://www.mhlw.go.jp/houdou/2004/03/h0305-1.html"

    21 "http://www.jil.go.jp/rodoqa/04-Q07.html"

    22 "http://withgonggam.tistory.com/1293"

    23 Vittorio Di Martino, "The High Road to Teleworking" ILO 2001

    24 CBI, "Telework Guidance"

    25 Manfred Weiss, "European Framework Agreements and Telework" Kluwer Law 2007

    26 Goldman(A. L. ), "European Framework Agreements and Telework" Kluwer Law 2007

    27 Blanpain (R), "European Framework Agreements and Telework" Kluwer Law 2007

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-06-17 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Institute for Legal Studies KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.78 0.78 0.74
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.75 0.76 0.82 0.14
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼