RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    John Dewey's art as experience: A treatise on the art of living.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10569386

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      [S.l.]: University of Oregon 2002

    • 학위수여대학

      University of Oregon

    • 수여연도

      2002

    • 작성언어

      영어

    • 주제어
    • 학위

      Ph.D.

    • 페이지수

      217 p.

    • 지도교수/심사위원

      Adviser: Scott L. Pratt.

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    John Dewey's theory of art is complex and far reaching, yet its thesis can be stated succinctly: Art and aesthetic experience are continuous with the ordinary processes of human life. Traditional theories of art, however different in their emphases, institutionalize the separation of art and ordinary life by hoisting art on a pedestal. This conceptual separation influences our attitudes, perceptions, and activities and diminishes the quality of our lived experience.
    Dewey argues that a new approach is needed because simply modifying or recombining received theories of art does not eliminate the gap that has been created. The view that Dewey develops shows that the aesthetic is no intruder from outside human experience, but is the result of the human sensori-motor interaction with the material of the human environment. The “work of art” is the process of the making and doing and the “art object” is the manifestation of this artistic process. When this is understood, there is no separation.
    Once art and ordinary experience are conceptually reconnected the question arises, how can there be this continuum and yet also a distinct category of “fine art?” The claim that there remains a separate category of art associated with the highest form of aesthetic experience creates a tension in Dewey's theory. I resolve this tension by introducing a new approach to categorizing art.
    In the first chapter, I introduce the problem of the separation of art from life and present a formalist theory as example of the separation that traditional theories take for granted. I explicate what Dewey means by experience in the second chapter and in the third I explain aesthetic experience. In chapter four, I present Dewey's conception of “fine art” and set the stage for introducing some critical responses to Dewey's theory in chapter five. In chapter six, I introduce a new approach to categorizing art. In the concluding remarks, I summarize the discussion and suggest that once we understand the category of art differently, we can understand how the highest degree of aesthetic experience connects to and influences our everyday interactions in ways that enrich our lives.
    번역하기

    John Dewey's theory of art is complex and far reaching, yet its thesis can be stated succinctly: Art and aesthetic experience are continuous with the ordinary processes of human life. Traditional theories of art, however different in their emphases, ...

    John Dewey's theory of art is complex and far reaching, yet its thesis can be stated succinctly: Art and aesthetic experience are continuous with the ordinary processes of human life. Traditional theories of art, however different in their emphases, institutionalize the separation of art and ordinary life by hoisting art on a pedestal. This conceptual separation influences our attitudes, perceptions, and activities and diminishes the quality of our lived experience.
    Dewey argues that a new approach is needed because simply modifying or recombining received theories of art does not eliminate the gap that has been created. The view that Dewey develops shows that the aesthetic is no intruder from outside human experience, but is the result of the human sensori-motor interaction with the material of the human environment. The “work of art” is the process of the making and doing and the “art object” is the manifestation of this artistic process. When this is understood, there is no separation.
    Once art and ordinary experience are conceptually reconnected the question arises, how can there be this continuum and yet also a distinct category of “fine art?” The claim that there remains a separate category of art associated with the highest form of aesthetic experience creates a tension in Dewey's theory. I resolve this tension by introducing a new approach to categorizing art.
    In the first chapter, I introduce the problem of the separation of art from life and present a formalist theory as example of the separation that traditional theories take for granted. I explicate what Dewey means by experience in the second chapter and in the third I explain aesthetic experience. In chapter four, I present Dewey's conception of “fine art” and set the stage for introducing some critical responses to Dewey's theory in chapter five. In chapter six, I introduce a new approach to categorizing art. In the concluding remarks, I summarize the discussion and suggest that once we understand the category of art differently, we can understand how the highest degree of aesthetic experience connects to and influences our everyday interactions in ways that enrich our lives.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼