RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국인을 위한 영어 말하기 시험의 컴퓨터 기반 유창성 평가 = Computer-Based Fluency Evaluation of English Speaking Tests for Koreans

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100027894

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In this paper, we propose an automatic fluency evaluation algorithm for English speaking tests. In the proposed algorithm, acoustic features are extracted from an input spoken utterance and then fluency score is computed by using support vector regression (SVR). We estimate the parameters of feature modeling and SVR using the speech signals and the corresponding scores by human raters. From the correlation analysis results, it is shown that speech rate, articulation rate, and mean length of runs are best for fluency evaluation. Experimental results show that the correlation between the human score and the SVR score is 0.87 for 3 speaking tests, which suggests the possibility of the proposed algorithm as a secondary fluency evaluation tool.
      번역하기

      In this paper, we propose an automatic fluency evaluation algorithm for English speaking tests. In the proposed algorithm, acoustic features are extracted from an input spoken utterance and then fluency score is computed by using support vector regres...

      In this paper, we propose an automatic fluency evaluation algorithm for English speaking tests. In the proposed algorithm, acoustic features are extracted from an input spoken utterance and then fluency score is computed by using support vector regression (SVR). We estimate the parameters of feature modeling and SVR using the speech signals and the corresponding scores by human raters. From the correlation analysis results, it is shown that speech rate, articulation rate, and mean length of runs are best for fluency evaluation. Experimental results show that the correlation between the human score and the SVR score is 0.87 for 3 speaking tests, which suggests the possibility of the proposed algorithm as a secondary fluency evaluation tool.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 배경 이론
      • 3. 제안 알고리듬
      • 4. 실험 결과
      • ABSTRACT
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 배경 이론
      • 3. 제안 알고리듬
      • 4. 실험 결과
      • 5. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Chambers, F., "What do we mean by fluency?" 25 (25): 535-544, 1997

      2 Riggenbach, H., "Toward an understanding of fluency : A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations" 14 (14): 423-441, 1991

      3 Towell, R., "The development of fluency in advanced learners of French" 17 (17): 84-119, 1996

      4 Paul, D. B., "The design for the Wall Street Journal-based CSR corpus" Association for Computational Linguistics 357-362, 1992

      5 Young, S., "The HTK Book(for HTK version 3. 4)" 2 (2): 2-3, 2006

      6 Lenzo, K., "The CMU pronouncing dictionary" 2007

      7 Drucker, H., "Support vector regression machines" 9 : 155-161, 1997

      8 Kendall, M. G., "Rank correlation methods"

      9 Müller, K. R., "Predicting time series with support vector machines" Springer Berlin Heidelberg 999-1004, 1997

      10 Shoup, J. E., "Phonological aspects of speech recognition" Trends in Speech Recognition 125-138, 1980

      1 Chambers, F., "What do we mean by fluency?" 25 (25): 535-544, 1997

      2 Riggenbach, H., "Toward an understanding of fluency : A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations" 14 (14): 423-441, 1991

      3 Towell, R., "The development of fluency in advanced learners of French" 17 (17): 84-119, 1996

      4 Paul, D. B., "The design for the Wall Street Journal-based CSR corpus" Association for Computational Linguistics 357-362, 1992

      5 Young, S., "The HTK Book(for HTK version 3. 4)" 2 (2): 2-3, 2006

      6 Lenzo, K., "The CMU pronouncing dictionary" 2007

      7 Drucker, H., "Support vector regression machines" 9 : 155-161, 1997

      8 Kendall, M. G., "Rank correlation methods"

      9 Müller, K. R., "Predicting time series with support vector machines" Springer Berlin Heidelberg 999-1004, 1997

      10 Shoup, J. E., "Phonological aspects of speech recognition" Trends in Speech Recognition 125-138, 1980

      11 Fillmore, C. J., "On fluency" 85-101, 1979

      12 Haykin, S., "Neural Networks" Prentice Hall 1999

      13 Vertanen, K., "HTK Wall Street Journal Training Recipe"

      14 Garofolo, J. S., "Getting started with the DARPA TIMIT CD-ROM: An acoustic phonetic continuous speech database" National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 107-, 1988

      15 Kormos, J., "Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners" 32 (32): 145-164, 2004

      16 Imai, S., "Cepstral analysis synthesis on the mel frequency scale" IEEE 93-96, 1983

      17 Neumeyer, L., "Automatic scoring of pronunciation quality" 30 (30): 83-93, 2000

      18 Smola, A. J., "A tutorial on support vector regression" 14 (14): 199-222, 2004

      19 Malvern, D. D., "A new measure of lexical diversity" 12 : 58-71, 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.5 0.5 0.52
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.5 0.49 0.988 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼