RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    受益者負擔制度에 관한 比較法的 硏究  :  美國의 開發負擔制度를 중심으로 Focusing on the Exaction System in United States = Comparative Law Research on the Benefit System

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40016122

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Korea has had a few supplementary systems directly or indirectly focusing on the development share by taxes or the law of development profit redemption, and many problems in a view of supplying public facilities reasonably and effectively. In this study, I introduced the development share system, the center of the beneficiary share system of the United States, which is establishing a very refined system against this matter, and attempted a comparative examination of law to review the Korean law relatively by comparative method.
    The development share system was divided into four: dedication of land, in-lieu fee, impact fee and linkage, and in the case law the analysis was tried in the classification points of the development share system and taxes by the personality of law. Especially, for the standard suggested as the difference between the development share and taking centered on the Supreme Court of the United States, the argument over the current development share and the nexus of the development permission was introduced and explained. This case law of the United States would be able to contribute to a deeper argument over the development share like a variety of dedication of land in the Supreme Court in Korea.
    번역하기

    Korea has had a few supplementary systems directly or indirectly focusing on the development share by taxes or the law of development profit redemption, and many problems in a view of supplying public facilities reasonably and effectively. In this stu...

    Korea has had a few supplementary systems directly or indirectly focusing on the development share by taxes or the law of development profit redemption, and many problems in a view of supplying public facilities reasonably and effectively. In this study, I introduced the development share system, the center of the beneficiary share system of the United States, which is establishing a very refined system against this matter, and attempted a comparative examination of law to review the Korean law relatively by comparative method.
    The development share system was divided into four: dedication of land, in-lieu fee, impact fee and linkage, and in the case law the analysis was tried in the classification points of the development share system and taxes by the personality of law. Especially, for the standard suggested as the difference between the development share and taking centered on the Supreme Court of the United States, the argument over the current development share and the nexus of the development permission was introduced and explained. This case law of the United States would be able to contribute to a deeper argument over the development share like a variety of dedication of land in the Supreme Court in Korea.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 序論
    • Ⅱ. 美國의 開發負擔制度
    • Ⅲ. 우리나라의 開發負擔制度
    • Ⅳ. 結論
    • Ⅰ. 序論
    • Ⅱ. 美國의 開發負擔制度
    • Ⅲ. 우리나라의 開發負擔制度
    • Ⅳ. 結論
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼