土地利用의 制度的 規制에 관한 硏究 = Research related with the Institutional Restriction of a land utility

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Our land problem is so serious and one of social problems required by a rapid solution policy in a narrowed land that the population density per a expanstion of arable land is high.
It is a real fact that we are making an order of transaction deal to corrupt because of a lack of a land legistative system and a land act in a prevalent land investigation until now. An increasing population, urbanization & continual life activity must be achieved on a limited land. The means of an institutional restriction must be performed to use such a limited national land effectually and. logically.
We are recognizing a public infringement about a property right by the public neccesity, publicity & sociality. We have to exercise personal property right as a promotion of a social welfare in a welfare state. But it doesn't mean to ignore a private benefit in order to enjoy a public benifit. A varied restriction means have to be administrated in an area to protect a property right security of the people.
Firstly, a 'basic' land act required urgently must be effectual in a standpoint of all-inclusive & long term to harmonize between a public interest and private interest.
Secondly, a land transaction deal order must be established through a licensed real estate agent system operated.
Consideration is given to public interest before private interest is unavoidable to use a limited land by a restriction means effectually & logically. When our government officers emphasize this forced institution by a government power exceedingly. An impinged property right of the people cannot be compensated by the government now. As this result, an extraordinary phenomenon will be happened of the people loss compensation institution must be prepared by a principle of equality imposition.
Therefore the land administration legalization must be fixed & Supplied for a public benefit & private benefit: a property right security. The dimocratization of land administration must be attained for a promotion of a public welfare.
A land policy must be achieved to use and manage our limited national land effectually.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次 = ⅰ
• 第l章 序論 = 1
• 第l節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究의 範圍 와 方法 = 2
• 第2章 土地利用規制의 內容 = 5
• 第一節 槪說 = 5
• I. 利用規制의 必要性 과 根據 = 5
• II. 規制의 史的背景 = 9
• III. 土地所有權과 利用權과의 關係 = 15
• 第2節 土地利用의 私法的規制 = 23
• I. 權利藍用禁止의 法理 = 23
• II. 相隣關係의 法理 = 26
• III. 生活妨害의 禁止와 忍容의 法理 = 29
• 第3節 土地利用의 公法的規制 = 33
• I. 公法的 規制의 內容 = 33
• II. 具體的 規制手段 = 35
• 1. 地域·地區·區域制 = 35
• 2. 去來찢約 許可制 및 볍 告制 = 50
• (l) 許可制 = 51
• (2) 申告制 = 60
• 3. 基準地價告示制度 = 64
• 4. 開發利益還收制度 = 70
• 第3章 土地利用規制에 관한 各國의 立法例 = 73
• 第1節 獨逸 = 73
• 第2節 英國 = 75
• 第3節 美國 = 77
• 第4節 自由中國 = 77
• 第5節 日本 = 79
• 第4章 土地利用規制 와 財産勸保障과의 關係 = 81
• 第l節 土地의 公槪念 = 81
• I. 土地公槪念의 意義 = 81
• II. 土地公槪念의 內容 = 82
• III. 財産勸保障에서 오는 土地公槪念의 盧構性 = 83
• 第2節 利用規制로 인한 損失의 補償 = 86
• I. 損失補償의 根據 = 87
• II. 損失補償의 範圍 = 91
• III. 現行 憲法上의 補償基準 = 92
• IV. 損失補償을 통한 財産勸保障 = 95
• 第3節 土地利用規制의 問題點과 限界 = 97
• 第5章 結論 = 101