RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고급 한국어 학습자의 조사 사용의 오류 분석  :  발표자료 분석을 중심으로 = An Analysis of errors in usage of particles of Advanced Korean Language Learners - Focusing on the analysis of presentation materials

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101696771

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study analyzes the errors in usage of particles, shown in presentation materials of Korean learners at advanced level. The purpose of the study is to find points to consider when teaching particles in spoken texts, based on the aspects of errors in usage of particles in spoken texts. Since most studies about this subject are conducted on written texts, it was not an easy task to compare written and spoken texts. The speeches of 43 Level 5 Korean language learners were recorded and analyzed. To find the aspects of errors in usage of particles, the errors were divided into three big categories based on error patterns, types of particles, and difference among individuals. The error patterns included errors of omission, addition, substitution, form, paraphrase and others. Among these patterns, error of omission had the highest frequency, and substitution had the second. Compared to the study of errors in written texts, error of substitution occurred most frequently and omission was next in written texts. This comparison shows that Korean learners at advanced level more frequently omit particles when speaking formally than when writing. According to the aspects of errors based on types of particles, in nominative particles error of omission was most frequent, and substitution was next. In objective particles however, error of substitution was most frequent and omission was next. Also particles ‘은/는’ and ‘에’ had a high rate of error. In aspects of individual errors, the result showed that there was a big difference in the rate of error between individuals.
      번역하기

      This study analyzes the errors in usage of particles, shown in presentation materials of Korean learners at advanced level. The purpose of the study is to find points to consider when teaching particles in spoken texts, based on the aspects of errors ...

      This study analyzes the errors in usage of particles, shown in presentation materials of Korean learners at advanced level. The purpose of the study is to find points to consider when teaching particles in spoken texts, based on the aspects of errors in usage of particles in spoken texts. Since most studies about this subject are conducted on written texts, it was not an easy task to compare written and spoken texts. The speeches of 43 Level 5 Korean language learners were recorded and analyzed. To find the aspects of errors in usage of particles, the errors were divided into three big categories based on error patterns, types of particles, and difference among individuals. The error patterns included errors of omission, addition, substitution, form, paraphrase and others. Among these patterns, error of omission had the highest frequency, and substitution had the second. Compared to the study of errors in written texts, error of substitution occurred most frequently and omission was next in written texts. This comparison shows that Korean learners at advanced level more frequently omit particles when speaking formally than when writing. According to the aspects of errors based on types of particles, in nominative particles error of omission was most frequent, and substitution was next. In objective particles however, error of substitution was most frequent and omission was next. Also particles ‘은/는’ and ‘에’ had a high rate of error. In aspects of individual errors, the result showed that there was a big difference in the rate of error between individuals.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 연구 방법
      • 3. 조사 오류의 양상
      • 3.1. 유형별 오류의 양상
      • 1) 탈락 오류
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 연구 방법
      • 3. 조사 오류의 양상
      • 3.1. 유형별 오류의 양상
      • 1) 탈락 오류
      • 2) 대치 오류
      • 3) 첨가, 이형태 및 환언 오류
      • 4) 기타 오류
      • 3.2. 조사별, 학습자별 오류의 양상
      • 4. 결론
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼