RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      집단민원현장 관리책임자의 역할과 법적지위: 경비지도사와의 역할 구분과 한계 사례를 중심으로 = The Role and Legal Status of the Person in Charge of Managing Sites with Group Civil Petition: Focusing on Role Differentiation and Limitations with Security Instructors

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109251412

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study discusses the role and legal status of the person in charge of managing sites with Group Civil Petition, as mentioned in the deployment permit application submitted by security companies when deploying security guards to such sites. Practically, the person in charge is often an executive or employee of the security company, which overlaps with the role of a security instructor who must be assigned to the site according to the Security Services Industry Act. This overlap can sometimes render the security instructor unnecessary. Recently, cases have emerged where security personnel with disqualifying factors are indirectly appointed as the person in charge, raising questions about the necessity of this role.
      In this study, the legal status of the person in charge of managing sites with Group Civil Petition is viewed as a contractual position rather than a managerial position under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Their role is limited to that of the security company.
      When the roles of the person in charge and the security instructor overlap, the role of the security instructor, which is clearly defined under the Security Services Industry Act, is prioritized. The role of the person in charge is restricted to issuing commands and directives necessary for security tasks. Even in such cases, the number of people in charge is limited to one, and disqualification criteria specified under the Security Services Industry Act are applied to ensure systematic management of sites with Group Civil Petition and contribute to the sound operation of the private security industry.
      번역하기

      This study discusses the role and legal status of the person in charge of managing sites with Group Civil Petition, as mentioned in the deployment permit application submitted by security companies when deploying security guards to such sites. Practic...

      This study discusses the role and legal status of the person in charge of managing sites with Group Civil Petition, as mentioned in the deployment permit application submitted by security companies when deploying security guards to such sites. Practically, the person in charge is often an executive or employee of the security company, which overlaps with the role of a security instructor who must be assigned to the site according to the Security Services Industry Act. This overlap can sometimes render the security instructor unnecessary. Recently, cases have emerged where security personnel with disqualifying factors are indirectly appointed as the person in charge, raising questions about the necessity of this role.
      In this study, the legal status of the person in charge of managing sites with Group Civil Petition is viewed as a contractual position rather than a managerial position under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Their role is limited to that of the security company.
      When the roles of the person in charge and the security instructor overlap, the role of the security instructor, which is clearly defined under the Security Services Industry Act, is prioritized. The role of the person in charge is restricted to issuing commands and directives necessary for security tasks. Even in such cases, the number of people in charge is limited to one, and disqualification criteria specified under the Security Services Industry Act are applied to ensure systematic management of sites with Group Civil Petition and contribute to the sound operation of the private security industry.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼