RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    `미완`의 괴물 『리처드 3세』의 문화적 텍스트로서의 저항성

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105356409

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper will examine the way various Renaissance writers describe Richard Ⅲ’s deformity in order to shed light on the difference and originality that Shakespeare’s strategy in describing Richard Ⅲ has. The way in which Richard Ⅲ is cast in Renaissance literature is nothing less than the process of making him a monster by maximizing his deformity and grotesqueness. However, it is not the main purpose of this paper to repeat the fact that Richard is a monster patchworked by numerous historians who were trying to contribute to the creation of Tudor myths. By re-reading the text of Richard Ⅲ in the frame of the Monster Theory that tries to interpret the monstrous character in the literature as the symbol of the duality, the boundary, and the cultural resistance, I will reexamine the subversive energies of Richard Ⅲ as a cultural subject that provide opportunities to expand social norms and boundaries of culture. To support this argument, the Monster Theory and Rene Girard’s scapegoat theory will be quoted as theoretical frameworks.
    번역하기

    This paper will examine the way various Renaissance writers describe Richard Ⅲ’s deformity in order to shed light on the difference and originality that Shakespeare’s strategy in describing Richard Ⅲ has. The way in which Richard Ⅲ is cast i...

    This paper will examine the way various Renaissance writers describe Richard Ⅲ’s deformity in order to shed light on the difference and originality that Shakespeare’s strategy in describing Richard Ⅲ has. The way in which Richard Ⅲ is cast in Renaissance literature is nothing less than the process of making him a monster by maximizing his deformity and grotesqueness. However, it is not the main purpose of this paper to repeat the fact that Richard is a monster patchworked by numerous historians who were trying to contribute to the creation of Tudor myths. By re-reading the text of Richard Ⅲ in the frame of the Monster Theory that tries to interpret the monstrous character in the literature as the symbol of the duality, the boundary, and the cultural resistance, I will reexamine the subversive energies of Richard Ⅲ as a cultural subject that provide opportunities to expand social norms and boundaries of culture. To support this argument, the Monster Theory and Rene Girard’s scapegoat theory will be quoted as theoretical frameworks.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 들어가는 말
    • 2. 르네상스 문학 속 리처드 3세의 위치: 희생양으로서의 ‘괴물’의 탄생
    • 3. ‘미완의 괴물’ 리처드: ‘괴물이론’을 통해 보는 『리처드 3세』의 문화적 저항성
    • 4. 결론: 괴물이라는 ‘차이’와 그 문화적 전복성
    • 인용문헌
    • 1. 들어가는 말
    • 2. 르네상스 문학 속 리처드 3세의 위치: 희생양으로서의 ‘괴물’의 탄생
    • 3. ‘미완의 괴물’ 리처드: ‘괴물이론’을 통해 보는 『리처드 3세』의 문화적 저항성
    • 4. 결론: 괴물이라는 ‘차이’와 그 문화적 전복성
    • 인용문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Girard, Rene, "Violence and the Sacred" Mineumsa 1997

    2 Szondi, Peter, "Theory of the Modern Drama: a Critical Edition" Polity 1987

    3 Freud, Sigmund, "The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIV. 1914-1916" The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis 1957

    4 Rous, John, "The Rous Roll" Sutton 1980

    5 Lull, Janice, "The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s History Plays" Cambridge UP 89-105,

    6 Garber, Marjorie, "Shakespeare’s Ghost Writers: Literature as Uncanny Causality" Routledge 79-103, 1987

    7 Day, Gillian, "Shakespeare at Stratford: King Richard Ⅲ" Thomson Learning 2002

    8 Garber, Marjorie, "Shakespeare After All" Anchor 2005

    9 Shakespeare, William, "Richard Ⅲ. (RSC) William Shakespeare: Complete Works" Macmilllan 1299-1381, 2007

    10 Kim, Mose, "Rene Girard: Anthropology of Desire, Violence, and Salvation" Kyobo Books 2009

    1 Girard, Rene, "Violence and the Sacred" Mineumsa 1997

    2 Szondi, Peter, "Theory of the Modern Drama: a Critical Edition" Polity 1987

    3 Freud, Sigmund, "The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIV. 1914-1916" The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis 1957

    4 Rous, John, "The Rous Roll" Sutton 1980

    5 Lull, Janice, "The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s History Plays" Cambridge UP 89-105,

    6 Garber, Marjorie, "Shakespeare’s Ghost Writers: Literature as Uncanny Causality" Routledge 79-103, 1987

    7 Day, Gillian, "Shakespeare at Stratford: King Richard Ⅲ" Thomson Learning 2002

    8 Garber, Marjorie, "Shakespeare After All" Anchor 2005

    9 Shakespeare, William, "Richard Ⅲ. (RSC) William Shakespeare: Complete Works" Macmilllan 1299-1381, 2007

    10 Kim, Mose, "Rene Girard: Anthropology of Desire, Violence, and Salvation" Kyobo Books 2009

    11 Hunt, Maurice, "Ordering Disorder in Richard Ⅲ" 6 (6): 11-29, 1989

    12 Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome, "Monster Theory: Reading Culture" UP Minnesota 3-25, 1996

    13 Rous, John, "History of the Kings of England (Historia Regum Angliae) (1486)" Sheldonian Theatre 1716

    14 Shakespeare, William, "Henry VI, Part 3. (RSC) William Shakespeare: Complete Works" Macmilllan 1236-1298, 2007

    15 Thomson, Rosemarie Garland, "Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature" Columbia UP 1997

    16 Vergil, Polydore, "English History (1512-13)" Camden Society 1844

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The New Korean Journal of English Lnaguage & Literature -> The New Korean Journal of English Language & Literature KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-04-21 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The New Korean Association of English Language and Literature KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.17 0.17 0.18
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.19 0.17 0.441 0.06
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼