RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    민족정신의 현재적 의미와 민족사상 = The Current meaning of National Ethos and National Thought

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105024906

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In an age of ‘globalization’, the main actor in international relations is nation state. One of issues is the harmony between national policies and global prosperity. The merit of nation state is to give the foundation of cultural coerciveness and political unification. Therefore instead of globalization need, the importance of nation state cannot be ignored. In the 21st century, one of our nation goals is to keep national identities. To achieve this goal we must keep our political, economical, and cultural identification and beef up the power of military capability.
    The priority of independent state is the incarnation of self-awakening for nation ethos. The incarnation of nation ethos is forceful drive for our life. In our long history, we have built the consciousness in my life and community. And political, economical, and cultural subjectiveness is not only important but also military capability is important. National ethos is the main factor of subjective incarnation.
    The abstract notion of national ethos becomes in concrete ideas and in stage of practical actions. The national ethos is foundation of national thoughts. The spirit of nation have built the function of incarnation in identification and independent capability. And the ethos have rooted on our life and have guided the orientation of national history. The spirit of nation have created the history of national identity. In 21st century we must created national identification of our spirit and in one world and among many identities we will have the cultural nation. To take over the ethos of long history is the way of our survival in new international system.
    번역하기

    In an age of ‘globalization’, the main actor in international relations is nation state. One of issues is the harmony between national policies and global prosperity. The merit of nation state is to give the foundation of cultural coerciveness and...

    In an age of ‘globalization’, the main actor in international relations is nation state. One of issues is the harmony between national policies and global prosperity. The merit of nation state is to give the foundation of cultural coerciveness and political unification. Therefore instead of globalization need, the importance of nation state cannot be ignored. In the 21st century, one of our nation goals is to keep national identities. To achieve this goal we must keep our political, economical, and cultural identification and beef up the power of military capability.
    The priority of independent state is the incarnation of self-awakening for nation ethos. The incarnation of nation ethos is forceful drive for our life. In our long history, we have built the consciousness in my life and community. And political, economical, and cultural subjectiveness is not only important but also military capability is important. National ethos is the main factor of subjective incarnation.
    The abstract notion of national ethos becomes in concrete ideas and in stage of practical actions. The national ethos is foundation of national thoughts. The spirit of nation have built the function of incarnation in identification and independent capability. And the ethos have rooted on our life and have guided the orientation of national history. The spirit of nation have created the history of national identity. In 21st century we must created national identification of our spirit and in one world and among many identities we will have the cultural nation. To take over the ethos of long history is the way of our survival in new international system.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 최남선, "「불함문화론」" 신동아 1972

    2 "현대국민윤리학 학연사" 1988

    3 탁석산, "한국의 주체성" 책세상 2000

    4 박종홍, "한국사상의 흐름과 고동" 민음사 Ⅴ : 1998

    5 박종홍, "한국사상,오늘의 과제 민족정신 敬虔의 사상 을 통한 새 진로" 민음사 Ⅴ : 1998

    6 백낙청 엮음, "창작과 비평사" 1981

    7 남경희, "주체, 외세,이념" 이화여대출판부 1995

    8 "세계철학과 한전망사" 1989

    9 노태구, "민족주의와 국제정치" 백산서당 2002

    10 안호상, "민족의 주체성과 화랑얼 배달문화연구원" 1967

    1 최남선, "「불함문화론」" 신동아 1972

    2 "현대국민윤리학 학연사" 1988

    3 탁석산, "한국의 주체성" 책세상 2000

    4 박종홍, "한국사상의 흐름과 고동" 민음사 Ⅴ : 1998

    5 박종홍, "한국사상,오늘의 과제 민족정신 敬虔의 사상 을 통한 새 진로" 민음사 Ⅴ : 1998

    6 백낙청 엮음, "창작과 비평사" 1981

    7 남경희, "주체, 외세,이념" 이화여대출판부 1995

    8 "세계철학과 한전망사" 1989

    9 노태구, "민족주의와 국제정치" 백산서당 2002

    10 안호상, "민족의 주체성과 화랑얼 배달문화연구원" 1967

    11 김형효, "韓國精神史의 現在的 認識 고려원" 1985

    12 김형효, "韓國思想散考 일지사" 1985

    13 박종홍, "韓國思想史 서문당" 1975

    14 최남선, "白頭山覲參記동아일보사" 1926년 32회 연재 1927년단행본간행

    15 Keohane, "World Politics in Transition" 1989

    16 Smith, "Theories of Nationalism" 1983

    17 Gilpin, "The Political economy of International Relations" Princeton Princeton university 1987

    18 Morita, "The Japan that Can Say No" 1990

    19 Tilly, "The Formation of National States in Western Europe" Princeton 1975

    20 Smith, "State and Nation in the Third World" 1983

    21 Heywood, "Politics" London : Macmillan Press Ltd 1997

    22 Hobsbawm, Eric J, "Nations and Nationalism since 1780" Univ of Cambridge Press 1990

    23 Nye, "Bound to Lead The changing Nature of American Power" Basic Books 1990

    24 Shultz, "A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc" 1989

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-02-18 학회명변경 한글명 : 단군학회 -> 고조선단군학회
    영문명 : Dangun Studies Association -> Gojoseon & Dangun Studies Association
    KCI등재
    2021-02-18 학술지명변경 한글명 : 단군학연구 -> 고조선단군학
    외국어명 : Journal of Dangun Studies -> The Journal of Gojoseon & Dangun Studies
    KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-04-03 학술지명변경 한글명 : 고조선단군학 -> 단군학연구
    외국어명 : The Journal of Gojoseon & Dangun Studies -> Journal of Dangun Studies
    KCI등재
    2017-06-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 고조선단군학회 -> 단군학회
    영문명 : Gojoseon & Dangun Studies Association -> Dangun Studies Association
    KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-04-11 학회명변경 한글명 : 단군학회 -> 고조선단군학회
    영문명 : 미등록 -> Gojoseon & Dangun Studies Association
    KCI등재
    2011-04-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 단군학연구 -> 고조선단군학
    외국어명 : Journal of Dangun Studies -> The Journal of Gojoseon & Dangun Studies
    KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.29 0.29 0.29
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.31 0.33 0.741 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼