인공지능 혁신에 대한 기대와 불안 요인 및 영향 연구 = Expectations and Anxieties Affecting Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence Revolution

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Humans have anxieties as well as expectations for artificial intelligence. This study attempted to identify the expectation and anxiety factors affecting the attitude toward artificial intelligence innovation and to ascertain how much influence they have on current artificial intelligence innovation. This study considered that attitudes toward artificial intelligence may be different for each generation sharing a similar technology change culture. Therefore, the researchers limited the research subjects to I generation, which is the main users of artificial intelligence in the future. As a main result, the factors of expectiation of ‘performance gain’, ‘positive social impact’, and the factor of anxiety of ‘threat to human-oriented social value’ were drawn, and these factors influenced weak and strong artificial intelligence respectively. The results of this study suggests that artificial intelligence should develop into a pleasant relationship with humankind.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 인공지능 혁신에 대한 태도에 영향을 미치는 기대와 불안요소들을 알아보고, 이들이 현재 대중들의 인식 속에서 어느 정도의 영향력을 가지는 지에 대해 확인해보고자 하였다. 본 연구는 비슷한 기술변화 문화를 공유한 세대별로 인공지능을 바라보는 태도가 다를 수 있음을 고려하여, 연구 대상을 미래 인공지능 주 소비층인 I-세대로 한정하였다. 본 연구의 결과, ‘업무 성과 향상’, ‘사회 질적 향상’의 기대요인과 ‘인간의 사회적 가치 위협’의 불안요인을 도출하였고, 이들 요인이 각각 약한 인공지능과 강한 인공지능에 미치는 영향을 확인하였다. 또한 I-세대가 현재 약한 인공지능에는 업무 성과 향상에 대한 높은 기대와 함께 매우 긍정적인 태도를 가지는 한편, 강한 인공지능에는 약한 인공지능과 비교해 불안을 많이 느끼며 태도의 긍정성도 낮아짐을 확인하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 인공지능이 인류와 유쾌한 관계 속에서 발전하는 방향에 대한 시사점을 제시한다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 찰스 랜드리, "창조도시" 해남 2005

2 칼 마르크스, "자본론 1/상" 비봉출판사 2015

3 레이 커즈와일, "마음의 탄생" 크레센도 2016

4 최희원, "디지털에서 인간을 발견하다" 글마당 2019

5 이현정, "드라마 <퍼슨 오브 인터레스트> 속 인공지능의 의미 연구" 한국콘텐츠학회 18 (18): 116-124, 2018

6 "https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/12/10/artifi cial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-humans/"

7 "https://www.ciosummits.com/what-consumers-real ly-think-about-ai.pdf"

8 "https://venturebeat.com/2019/01/21/gartner-enter prise-ai-implementation-grew-270-over-the-past -four-years/"

9 "https://fortune.com/2017/09/24/futurist-ray-kurz weil-job-automation-loss/"

10 "http://www.medicaltimes.com/newMobile/newsVie w.html?ID=1112945"

11 "http://www.kukinews.com/news/article.html?no=652112"

12 "http://www.autodaily.co.kr/news/articleView.ht ml?idxno=406496"

13 "http://biz.khan.co.kr/khan_art_view.html?artid=201907041758001&code=920100"

14 J. Kaplan, "Viewpoint: Artificial intelligence: Think again" Association for Computing Machinary 2017

15 S. Taylor, "Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models" 6 (6): 144-176, 1995

16 N. Fox, "The ‘expert patient’: empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the internet" 60 : 1299-1399, 2005

17 H. Kaiser, "The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis" 23 (23): 1958

18 J. Bonnefon, "The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles" 352 (352): 1573-1576, 2016

19 M. Brundage, "The malicious use of artificial intelligence:Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation"

20 H. Wilson, "The jobs that artificial intelligence will create" 58 : 14-16, 2017

21 R. Fobes, "The Creative Problem Solver's Toolbox: A Complete Course in the Arts of Creating Solutions to Problems of Any Kind" Solutions Through Innovation 1993

22 V. Gherhes, "Technical and humanities students’ perspectives on the development and sustainability of artificial intelligence" 10 (10): 3066-, 2018

23 I. Good, "Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine" 6 : 31-88, 1966

24 T. Braun, "Security and privacy challenges in smart cities" 39 : 499-507, 2018

25 J. Riley, "Rising Life Expectancy: A Global History" Cambridge University Press 2001

26 D. Wright, "Privacy, trust and policy-making: Challenges and responses" 25 : 69-83, 2009

27 P. Schulz, "Patient behavior and the benefits of artificial intelligence: the perils of “dangerous” literacy and illusory patient empowerment" 92 (92): 223-228, 2013

28 Z. Allam, "On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities" 89 : 80-91, 2019

29 D. Santos, "Medical students’ attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey" 29 : 1640-1646, 2019

30 J. McCarthy, "Making Robots Conscious of Their Mental States" 15 : 3-17, 1995

31 R. Fulbright, "How personal cognitive augmentation will lead to the democratization of expertise" 2016

32 M. Hoske, "Hot technology jobs: Computers, telecommunications, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, robotics" 60 : 2013

33 S. Popenici, "Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education" 12 (12): 22-, 2017

34 A. Pavaloiu, "Ethical Artificial Intelligence- An Open Question" 2 (2): 15-27, 2017

35 C. Ciborra, "Digital technologies and the duality of risk" Certre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science 2004

36 D. Wang, "Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer"

37 European Commision, "Attitudes toward the impact of digitisation and automation on daily life"

38 D. Hashimoto, "Artificial intelligence in surgery:promises and perils" 268 (268): 70-76, 2018

39 T. Davenport, "Artificial intelligence for the real world" 2018

40 M. Hengstler, "Applied artificial intelligence and trust- The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices" 105 : 105-120, 2016

41 R. Likert, "A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes" 140 : 1-55, 1932

42 M. Scheutz, "13 The Inherent Dangers of Unidirectional Emotional Bonds between Humans and Social Robots" 205 : 2011

43 진 트웨진, "#I-세대" 매일경제신문사 2018