RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    농업생산성의 제고와 농지의 합리적 이용을 위한 농지임대차법제의 개선방안 = Reforming the Farmland Lease Act to enhance agricultural productivity and to efficiently utilize farmland

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    A farmland lease is a contract in which the legal object is farmland. This is in contrast to the Housing Lease Protection Act and the Commercial Building Lease Act, in which the legal objects are a private house and a commercial building respectively. The law pertaining to the agricultural land realizes the land to the tillers principle of the Korean Constitution; however, at the same time, a lease contract is predicated upon the Korean Civil Code. Specifically, the Farmland Act stipulates that no farmland, except for the cases stated in the law, shall be leased or lent gratuitously. Despite such policy, many people are facing huge difficulties in finding leaseholders, resulting in an excess supply of idle agrarian land. Also, the agricultural population is considerably declining, which is a double blow to the problem. This reality only highlights the question of whether it is necessary to maintain the land to the tillers principle. If so, a thorough discussion on how to establish appropriate legal interpretations that best reflect the current condition is essential.
    In light of this, this research suggests legal interpretations that are in accordance with the constitution and measures to improve agricultural productivity and efficiency from the standpoint of the constitutional principle.
    First, an efficient and effective usage of the farmland lease policy without undermining the constitutional principle is needed in order to bring about structural reform to a diversified and complex agricultural sector.
    Secondly, revising the Farmland Act is required to enhance autonomy in terms of farmland rental contracts and to protect a lessee. Especially, the law should prescribe penalties for violations of a written contract and extend the duration of a farmland lease contract to at least 5 or 10 years. With respect to the transfer of farmland, legal measures that give priority to a leaseholder should be considered. Moreover, since solely relying on the article regarding 3 months of implicit renewal is insufficient to protect a lessee, it is essential to enact regulations that guarantee a long term contract and set the maximum limit for rents. Also, a lessee should be provided with the right to terminate a lease contract in case of alienating the property to a transferee. This would safeguard the lessee from adverse effects of succession to legal status of a lessor.
    Thirdly, relevant farm workers should be able to claim the right of preemption for farmland entrusted to a farmland bank.
    Fourth, it is needful to offer commensurate incentives for lessors through restructuring farmland taxation. These benefits can be provided in the form of tax reduction such as remitting acquisition tax, property tax, capital gains tax and etc. Particularly, in case of a long term rental arrangement for 8 years or more, 70% of special deduction for long-term holding, a rate that is also applied to general house lease, should be accounted when calculating capital gains tax. Also, it may be significant to eliminate non-business purpose land classification so that the extra tax rate(10%) is not added to the standard tax rate(6%~42%). Lastly, additional tax deduction should be offered to a long term leaseholder who executes his/her right of preemption.
    번역하기

    A farmland lease is a contract in which the legal object is farmland. This is in contrast to the Housing Lease Protection Act and the Commercial Building Lease Act, in which the legal objects are a private house and a commercial building respectively....

    A farmland lease is a contract in which the legal object is farmland. This is in contrast to the Housing Lease Protection Act and the Commercial Building Lease Act, in which the legal objects are a private house and a commercial building respectively. The law pertaining to the agricultural land realizes the land to the tillers principle of the Korean Constitution; however, at the same time, a lease contract is predicated upon the Korean Civil Code. Specifically, the Farmland Act stipulates that no farmland, except for the cases stated in the law, shall be leased or lent gratuitously. Despite such policy, many people are facing huge difficulties in finding leaseholders, resulting in an excess supply of idle agrarian land. Also, the agricultural population is considerably declining, which is a double blow to the problem. This reality only highlights the question of whether it is necessary to maintain the land to the tillers principle. If so, a thorough discussion on how to establish appropriate legal interpretations that best reflect the current condition is essential.
    In light of this, this research suggests legal interpretations that are in accordance with the constitution and measures to improve agricultural productivity and efficiency from the standpoint of the constitutional principle.
    First, an efficient and effective usage of the farmland lease policy without undermining the constitutional principle is needed in order to bring about structural reform to a diversified and complex agricultural sector.
    Secondly, revising the Farmland Act is required to enhance autonomy in terms of farmland rental contracts and to protect a lessee. Especially, the law should prescribe penalties for violations of a written contract and extend the duration of a farmland lease contract to at least 5 or 10 years. With respect to the transfer of farmland, legal measures that give priority to a leaseholder should be considered. Moreover, since solely relying on the article regarding 3 months of implicit renewal is insufficient to protect a lessee, it is essential to enact regulations that guarantee a long term contract and set the maximum limit for rents. Also, a lessee should be provided with the right to terminate a lease contract in case of alienating the property to a transferee. This would safeguard the lessee from adverse effects of succession to legal status of a lessor.
    Thirdly, relevant farm workers should be able to claim the right of preemption for farmland entrusted to a farmland bank.
    Fourth, it is needful to offer commensurate incentives for lessors through restructuring farmland taxation. These benefits can be provided in the form of tax reduction such as remitting acquisition tax, property tax, capital gains tax and etc. Particularly, in case of a long term rental arrangement for 8 years or more, 70% of special deduction for long-term holding, a rate that is also applied to general house lease, should be accounted when calculating capital gains tax. Also, it may be significant to eliminate non-business purpose land classification so that the extra tax rate(10%) is not added to the standard tax rate(6%~42%). Lastly, additional tax deduction should be offered to a long term leaseholder who executes his/her right of preemption.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이종수, "한국헌법상 '경자유전(耕者有田)의 원칙'과 한계" 한국토지법학회 24 (24): 1-22, 2008

    2 김홍상, "한국 농지제도의 현황과 과제" 한국토지법학회 (20) : 2005

    3 소성규, "채권각론" 동방문화사 2018

    4 관계부처 합동, "집주인과 세입자가 상생하는 임대주택등록 활성화 방안"

    5 통계청, "임차농지 비율 및 임차료율"

    6 삼일아이닷컴, "임대사업자의 세제혜택"

    7 김진현, "우리 주택임대차제도의 문제점에 관한 비교법적 연구" 한국민사법학회 (13・14) : 1996

    8 신희준, "농지제도 개편에 따른 농지은행제도 도입방안" 14 (14): 2004

    9 사동천, "농지임대차의 문제점" 법학연구소 11 (11): 131-167, 2010

    10 정경미, "농지임대차법제의 개선방안에 관한 연구" 법과정책연구원 5 (5): 85-109, 2013

    1 이종수, "한국헌법상 '경자유전(耕者有田)의 원칙'과 한계" 한국토지법학회 24 (24): 1-22, 2008

    2 김홍상, "한국 농지제도의 현황과 과제" 한국토지법학회 (20) : 2005

    3 소성규, "채권각론" 동방문화사 2018

    4 관계부처 합동, "집주인과 세입자가 상생하는 임대주택등록 활성화 방안"

    5 통계청, "임차농지 비율 및 임차료율"

    6 삼일아이닷컴, "임대사업자의 세제혜택"

    7 김진현, "우리 주택임대차제도의 문제점에 관한 비교법적 연구" 한국민사법학회 (13・14) : 1996

    8 신희준, "농지제도 개편에 따른 농지은행제도 도입방안" 14 (14): 2004

    9 사동천, "농지임대차의 문제점" 법학연구소 11 (11): 131-167, 2010

    10 정경미, "농지임대차법제의 개선방안에 관한 연구" 법과정책연구원 5 (5): 85-109, 2013

    11 농림부, "농지이용법령해설 및 문답집" 1996

    12 김대명, "농지의 소유제도 연구" 한국법학회 (33) : 1-38, 2009

    13 송재일, "농지의 사용⋅수익에 관한 비교법적 고찰 - 임대차를 중심으로 -" 한국비교사법학회 18 (18): 1209-1262, 2011

    14 김은경, "농지규제의 현황과 개선방향- 농업진흥지역 지정제도를 중심으로 -" 한국규제학회 16 (16): 193-220, 2007

    15 김수용, "농지규제법제에 대한 입법평가" 한국법제연구원 2009

    16 송재일, "농지거래에 관한 법적 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2010

    17 김지석, "농업 6차산업화 활성화를 위한 농지임대차제도 개선방안" 한국법정책학회 16 (16): 191-208, 2016

    18 "국세청 법규과-3559, 2008.8.21"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.93 0.93 0.77
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.73 0.71 0.839 0.41
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼