임플란트 나사선 경사각과 식립 각도에 따른 3차원 유한요소 응력분석|RISS 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to find an inclination slope of the screw thread that is favorable in distributing the stresses to alveolar bone by using three dimensional finite element analysis. Materials and methods: Three types modelling changed implant thread with fixed pitch of 0.8 mm is the single thread implant with $3.8^{\circ}$ inclination, double thread implant with $7.7^{\circ}$ inclination and the triple thread implant with $11.5^{\circ}$ inclination. And three types implant angulation is the $0^{\circ}$, $10^{\circ}$ and $15^{\circ}$ on alveolar bone. The 9 modelling fabricated for three dimensional finite element analysis that restored prosthesis crown. The crown center applied on 200 N vertical load and $15^{\circ}$ tilting load. Results: 1. The more tilting of implant angulation, the more Von-Mises stress and Max principal stress is increasing. 2. Von-Mises stress and Max principal stress is increasing when applied $15^{\circ}$ tilting load than vertical load on the bone. 3. When the number of thread increased, the amount of Von-Mises stress, Max principal stress was reduced since the generated stress was effectively distributed. 4. Since the maximum principal stress affects on the alveolar bone can influence deeply on the longevity of the implants. When comparing the magnitude of the maximum principal stress, the triple thread implant had a least amount of stress. This shows that the triple thread implant gave a best result. Conclusion: A triple thread implant to increase in the thread slope inclination and number of thread is more effective on the distribution of stress than the single and double thread implants especially, implant angulation is more tilting than $10^{\circ}$ on alveolar bone. Thus, effective combination of thread number and thread slope inclination can help prolonging the longevity of implant.

번역하기

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Borchers L, "Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development" 62 : 155-159, 1983

2 Papavasiliou G, "Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function" 76 : 633-640, 1996

3 Bra nemark PI, "Osseointegration and its experimental background" 50 : 399-410, 1983

4 Siegele D, "Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone" 4 : 333-340, 1989

5 Hoshaw SJ, "Mechanical loading of Bra nemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling" 9 : 345-360, 1994

6 Isidor F, "Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys" 7 : 143-152, 1996

7 Holmes DC, "Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants" 23 : 104-111, 1997

8 Rangert B, "Forces and moments on Bra nemark implants" 4 : 241-247, 1989

9 Rieger MR, "Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants" 63 : 671-676, 1990

10 Bidez MW, "Finite element analysis of four-abutment Hader bar designs" 2 : 171-176, 1993