RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    알렉산드로스에게 바치는 플루타르코스의 헌사 : 「알렉산드로스의 덕과 운명에 관하여」 = A Dedication of Plutarchos to Alexandros

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107256259

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Plutarch showed different viewpoint about Alexander in the ‘Alexander’ in Parellel Lives and ‘On the Virtue and Fortune of Alexander m Moralia. One showed Alexander as a great hero but somewhat critic about his nature and behavior. The other showed eurocentristic viewpoint as a philosopher in civilizing Asia. And ‘Alexander’ in Parellel Lives estimated him as a beloved by gods, but ‘On the Virtue and Fortune of Alexander in Moralia estimated him a overcomer by virtue on goddess of fortune in obstructions by her.
    This divergence was started by difference of goals of the two. The former was a part of Parellel Lives to give instruction to readers, in that means, Plutarch should refer some weak points of Alexander. But the latter was a lecture to general audience of Rome, in that means, Plutarch should not use weak points. Besides, he was an elite intellectual in a colony of Roman Empire, so he wanted to stress Alexander’s great achievements as a hero of his homeland. And the peculiarity of lecture made stress dramatic episodes for emotional response of audience. Plutarch was a public writer not strict historian, in the treatment about historical figures.
    번역하기

    Plutarch showed different viewpoint about Alexander in the ‘Alexander’ in Parellel Lives and ‘On the Virtue and Fortune of Alexander m Moralia. One showed Alexander as a great hero but somewhat critic about his nature and behavior. The other sho...

    Plutarch showed different viewpoint about Alexander in the ‘Alexander’ in Parellel Lives and ‘On the Virtue and Fortune of Alexander m Moralia. One showed Alexander as a great hero but somewhat critic about his nature and behavior. The other showed eurocentristic viewpoint as a philosopher in civilizing Asia. And ‘Alexander’ in Parellel Lives estimated him as a beloved by gods, but ‘On the Virtue and Fortune of Alexander in Moralia estimated him a overcomer by virtue on goddess of fortune in obstructions by her.
    This divergence was started by difference of goals of the two. The former was a part of Parellel Lives to give instruction to readers, in that means, Plutarch should refer some weak points of Alexander. But the latter was a lecture to general audience of Rome, in that means, Plutarch should not use weak points. Besides, he was an elite intellectual in a colony of Roman Empire, so he wanted to stress Alexander’s great achievements as a hero of his homeland. And the peculiarity of lecture made stress dramatic episodes for emotional response of audience. Plutarch was a public writer not strict historian, in the treatment about historical figures.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼