Plutarch showed different viewpoint about Alexander in the ‘Alexander’ in Parellel Lives and ‘On the Virtue and Fortune of Alexander m Moralia. One showed Alexander as a great hero but somewhat critic about his nature and behavior. The other sho...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Plutarch showed different viewpoint about Alexander in the ‘Alexander’ in Parellel Lives and ‘On the Virtue and Fortune of Alexander m Moralia. One showed Alexander as a great hero but somewhat critic about his nature and behavior. The other sho...
Plutarch showed different viewpoint about Alexander in the ‘Alexander’ in Parellel Lives and ‘On the Virtue and Fortune of Alexander m Moralia. One showed Alexander as a great hero but somewhat critic about his nature and behavior. The other showed eurocentristic viewpoint as a philosopher in civilizing Asia. And ‘Alexander’ in Parellel Lives estimated him as a beloved by gods, but ‘On the Virtue and Fortune of Alexander in Moralia estimated him a overcomer by virtue on goddess of fortune in obstructions by her.
This divergence was started by difference of goals of the two. The former was a part of Parellel Lives to give instruction to readers, in that means, Plutarch should refer some weak points of Alexander. But the latter was a lecture to general audience of Rome, in that means, Plutarch should not use weak points. Besides, he was an elite intellectual in a colony of Roman Empire, so he wanted to stress Alexander’s great achievements as a hero of his homeland. And the peculiarity of lecture made stress dramatic episodes for emotional response of audience. Plutarch was a public writer not strict historian, in the treatment about historical figures.
청주(淸州)를 노래한 집경시(集景詩) (1) - 죽헌(竹軒) 신필청 -