다속성 효용이론에 근거한 조건부 가치측정법을 이용한 낙동강 하구의 환경가치 추정 = Using the Contingent Valuation Method Based on Multi-attribute Utility Theory to Measure the Environmental Value of the Nakdong-river Estuary

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper attempts to measure the environmental value of the Nakdong-river estuary, which is ecologically important but confronted with the threat of development. Especially, in order to elicit the environmental values of its four attributes, contingent valuation method (CVM) based on multi-attribute utility theory is applied and the CVM survey was rigorously designed to comply with the guidelines for best-practiced CVM studies. We surveyed a randomly selected sample of 400 and 350 households in Busan and six large cities (Seoul, Incheon, Daegu, Daejeon, Gwangju, and Ulsan), respectively and asked respondents questions in person-to-person interviews about how they would willing to pay for the estuary conservation and management program. Respondents overall accepted the contingent market and were willing to contribute a significant amount (2,457 won in Busan and 3,560 won in six large cities), on average, per household per year, which implies that there exists a large difference between the two. The aggregate values of the Nakdong-river estuary in Busan and six large cities amount to 2.92 and 22.32 billion won, respectively, per year. In addition, expanding the values to Korea produces 51.34 billion won per year. The quantitative values can be utilized in planning and decision-making about development versus conservation of the estuary.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "하구석호 육해전이수역 통합환경관리방안 연구" 한국해양수산개발원 2001

2 "컨조인트 분석을 이용한 한강 하구의 가치추정" 54 (54): 141-161, 2006

3 "지속가능한 하구역 관리방안 II" 한국환경정책평가연구원 (05-21-03) : 2005

4 "낙동강 하구역의 생태경제학적 가치평가와 보전방안에 관한 연구" 부산발전연구원 (2004-20) : 2004

5 "and H. Schuman. 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register" 4601-4614,

6 "and B.J. Kaninnen. 1991. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Am. J. Agr. Econ." Hanemann 1255-1263,

7 "Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries" Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 1999

8 "Using a spike model to deal with zero response data from double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys" 9 : 929-932, 2002

9 "The social costs of electricity: do the numbers add up?" 18 : 423-466, 1996

10 "The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: Methodological Issues and Research Needs" Edward Elgar 1996

11 "Spike models in contingent valuation" 79 : 1013-1023, 1997

12 "R.C. and R.T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods:The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future" Washington d.c.

13 "Modeling willingness to pay responses from dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys with zero observations" 33 : 523-529, 2001

14 "Measuring the economic benefits of the ozone pollution control policy in Seoul: results of a contingent valuation survey" 38 : 49-60, 2001

15 "J. and G.S. Maddala. 1993. A Perspective on Application of Bootstrap Methods in Econometrics. In Handbook of Statistics" Vol. 11. North-Holland. eco (eco):

16 "Freeman III A.M. 1993. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Resources for the Future"

17 "Experimenting with multi-attribute utility survey methods in a multi-dimensional valuation problem" 36 : 87-108, 2001

18 "A constructive approach to air-quality valuation in Korea" 38 : 327-344, 2002