RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    영국의 학사 후 의학교육과정의 도입 및 전개과정 = The Introduction and Development of Graduate Entry Programmes in the United Kingdom

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103845920

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the United Kingdom, 4‐year graduate‐only medical education programmes (Graduate Entry Programme, GEP) started in 2000, and are running in 16 medical schools with over 800 students annually. This study presents the grounds for introduction of the GEP,and explores its benefits in increasing the medical workforce and widening participation in medical education. An increase in medical student numbers was proposed to cope with the pressing shortage of British doctors and the growing demand for doctors, and the GEP was introduced as a flexible and cost‐effective way to meet this demand. It has contributed to increasing the diversity of students in medical schools and widening access to students from more varied social and educational backgrounds. In the United Kingdom, the GEP was established as a supplementary means of providing medical education, and it is unlikely to totally replace traditional 5- or 6-year programmes.
    번역하기

    In the United Kingdom, 4‐year graduate‐only medical education programmes (Graduate Entry Programme, GEP) started in 2000, and are running in 16 medical schools with over 800 students annually. This study presents the grounds for introduction of th...

    In the United Kingdom, 4‐year graduate‐only medical education programmes (Graduate Entry Programme, GEP) started in 2000, and are running in 16 medical schools with over 800 students annually. This study presents the grounds for introduction of the GEP,and explores its benefits in increasing the medical workforce and widening participation in medical education. An increase in medical student numbers was proposed to cope with the pressing shortage of British doctors and the growing demand for doctors, and the GEP was introduced as a flexible and cost‐effective way to meet this demand. It has contributed to increasing the diversity of students in medical schools and widening access to students from more varied social and educational backgrounds. In the United Kingdom, the GEP was established as a supplementary means of providing medical education, and it is unlikely to totally replace traditional 5- or 6-year programmes.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 신좌섭, "의학전문대학원 제도 추진경과에 대한 고찰" 한국의학교육학회 18 (18): 121-132, 2006

    2 Seyan K, "The standardised admission ratio for measuring widening participation in medical schools: analysis of UK medical school admissions by ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and sex" 328 : 1545-1546, 2004

    3 Peile E, "Should all medical students be graduates first? Yes" 335 : 1072-, 2007

    4 George C, "Should all medical students be graduates first?" 335 : 1073-, 2007

    5 Higher Education Funding Council for England, "Report 99/42: Increasing medical student numbers in England [Internet]" HEFCE

    6 Medical Workforce Standing Advisory Committee, "Planning the medical workforce: third report" Department of Health 1997

    7 Woodall A, "Mature entrants to medicine" 315 : 2-, 1997

    8 Fletcher E, "Home medical students account for less than half the full registrants Britain requires" 314 : 1278-, 1997

    9 James D, "Graduate entry to medicine: widening academic and socio-demographic access" 42 : 294-300, 2008

    10 Homes D, "Eight years' experience of widening access to medical education" 36 : 979-984, 2002

    1 신좌섭, "의학전문대학원 제도 추진경과에 대한 고찰" 한국의학교육학회 18 (18): 121-132, 2006

    2 Seyan K, "The standardised admission ratio for measuring widening participation in medical schools: analysis of UK medical school admissions by ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and sex" 328 : 1545-1546, 2004

    3 Peile E, "Should all medical students be graduates first? Yes" 335 : 1072-, 2007

    4 George C, "Should all medical students be graduates first?" 335 : 1073-, 2007

    5 Higher Education Funding Council for England, "Report 99/42: Increasing medical student numbers in England [Internet]" HEFCE

    6 Medical Workforce Standing Advisory Committee, "Planning the medical workforce: third report" Department of Health 1997

    7 Woodall A, "Mature entrants to medicine" 315 : 2-, 1997

    8 Fletcher E, "Home medical students account for less than half the full registrants Britain requires" 314 : 1278-, 1997

    9 James D, "Graduate entry to medicine: widening academic and socio-demographic access" 42 : 294-300, 2008

    10 Homes D, "Eight years' experience of widening access to medical education" 36 : 979-984, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-07-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국의학교육 -> Korean Journal of Medical Education
    외국어명 : korean journal of medical education -> 미등록
    KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.02 1.02 0.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.82 0.76 1.204 0.08
    더보기
    해외이동버튼