RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      한국 공직문화의 원형: 자리문화 = The Origins of Korean Administrative Culture: Jari Culture

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101758981

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Previous studies on administrative culture have focused more on administrative organization rather than on the administration itself, and scholars have tended to favor survey methods, which deal with culture as an independent or dependent variable. The administrative culture can be seen as a manipulative variable depending on the purpose of the organization. This study breaks out of what those studies assume and takes an interpretive position to understand Korean administrative culture. Administrative culture is heavily rooted in characters and elements of the administration. There are four conclusions drawn from this study. First, administrative culture in Korea has its roots in and around the meaning of a “bureaucratic position” or a “public duty.” Second, a Korean word, “jari,” which literally means a place or a seat where one can usually sit or stand, is used figuratively to symbolize bureaucratic position and status. Third, the meaning of jari is not unified: it can be used as an inherited property, a gift in return for loyalty, a rank and a pecking order, or sometimes as a professional career or an occupation. Jari competition is a nerve-racking task incorporating all the other meanings. Last, jari culture encompasses administrative cultures of Korea such as rankism, authoritarianism, paternalism, familial and factional ties, nepotism, formalism, and more. Jari culture defines a way of life and the value of bureaucratic officials who want to identify or construct their self-image by comparing the relative value of their seats.
      번역하기

      Previous studies on administrative culture have focused more on administrative organization rather than on the administration itself, and scholars have tended to favor survey methods, which deal with culture as an independent or dependent variable. Th...

      Previous studies on administrative culture have focused more on administrative organization rather than on the administration itself, and scholars have tended to favor survey methods, which deal with culture as an independent or dependent variable. The administrative culture can be seen as a manipulative variable depending on the purpose of the organization. This study breaks out of what those studies assume and takes an interpretive position to understand Korean administrative culture. Administrative culture is heavily rooted in characters and elements of the administration. There are four conclusions drawn from this study. First, administrative culture in Korea has its roots in and around the meaning of a “bureaucratic position” or a “public duty.” Second, a Korean word, “jari,” which literally means a place or a seat where one can usually sit or stand, is used figuratively to symbolize bureaucratic position and status. Third, the meaning of jari is not unified: it can be used as an inherited property, a gift in return for loyalty, a rank and a pecking order, or sometimes as a professional career or an occupation. Jari competition is a nerve-racking task incorporating all the other meanings. Last, jari culture encompasses administrative cultures of Korea such as rankism, authoritarianism, paternalism, familial and factional ties, nepotism, formalism, and more. Jari culture defines a way of life and the value of bureaucratic officials who want to identify or construct their self-image by comparing the relative value of their seats.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼