RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      경험은 중요한가?: 원전지역 주민들의 경험 효과에 대한 분석 = Does Experience Matter?: The Effect of Local Residents` Experience on Acceptance of Nuclear Power

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101758986

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Experience has been neglected because the psychometric paradigm in risk studies has focused heavily on factors related to perception. Hence, our study examines the effect of certain types of experience. We set a pro-attitude toward extended operation of nuclear power as the dependent variable and, as independent variables, five types of experience related to accidents, information, social network, visit to a nuclear power plant, and protest. Analysis shows that first, the five types of experience significantly influence the acceptance of the extension. Specifically, experience related to accidents, social network, or protest has a negative effect, whereas experience related to information or visiting a nuclear power plant has a positive effect. Second, experience.in particular, accident and information.to a large extent affects risk judgement. Accident experience has a negative effect, whereas experience related to social network, plant visit, or protest has a positive effect. Third, experience moderates the relationships between perceived benefit, risk, trust, and acceptance.
      번역하기

      Experience has been neglected because the psychometric paradigm in risk studies has focused heavily on factors related to perception. Hence, our study examines the effect of certain types of experience. We set a pro-attitude toward extended operation ...

      Experience has been neglected because the psychometric paradigm in risk studies has focused heavily on factors related to perception. Hence, our study examines the effect of certain types of experience. We set a pro-attitude toward extended operation of nuclear power as the dependent variable and, as independent variables, five types of experience related to accidents, information, social network, visit to a nuclear power plant, and protest. Analysis shows that first, the five types of experience significantly influence the acceptance of the extension. Specifically, experience related to accidents, social network, or protest has a negative effect, whereas experience related to information or visiting a nuclear power plant has a positive effect. Second, experience.in particular, accident and information.to a large extent affects risk judgement. Accident experience has a negative effect, whereas experience related to social network, plant visit, or protest has a positive effect. Third, experience moderates the relationships between perceived benefit, risk, trust, and acceptance.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김서용, "후쿠시마 원전사고에 대한 한국민의 위험판단 과정에 대한 분석: 휴리스틱-체계적 모형(HSM)에서 정보수신자의 관여와 능력의 역할을 중심으로" 정부학연구소 20 (20): 315-343, 2014

      2 김서용, "후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 원전사고와 원자력에 대한 위험판단 분석: 위험지각패러다임과 위험소통모형의 통합 적용을 통해" 한국행정연구원 23 (23): 113-143, 2014

      3 왕재선, "후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 원자력 수용성 및 인식구조 변화에 대한 탐색적 분석" 한국행정학회 47 (47): 395-424, 2013

      4 서혁준, "지역에너지 거버넌스 구축요인 분석" 한국지방행정연구원 28 (28): 283-312, 2014

      5 김서용, "위험과 편익을 넘어서: 원자력발전소 수용성에 대한 경험적 감정의 휴리스틱 효과" 한국행정학회 41 (41): 373-398, 2007

      6 김서용, "위험과 편익사이에서 : 방폐장 수용성의 결정요인에 대한 분석" 한국행정연구원 15 (15): 297-330, 2006

      7 임채홍, "원전비리 사건의 부정적 효과와 신뢰기제 분석" 한국행정연구원 23 (23): 131-159, 2014

      8 심준섭, "원자력발전소 주변 지역주민의 갈등 프레임 분석: 후쿠시마 원전사고의 영향을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 45 (45): 173-202, 2011

      9 유연재, "가치, 경험, 지각 - 원자력 수용성에서 가치 및 경험 기반 중층모형(Multi-layer Model)의 적합성에 대한 탐색적 연구-" 위기관리 이론과 실천 11 (11): 179-201, 2015

      10 Dake, K, "Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why" 119 (119): 41-60, 1990

      1 김서용, "후쿠시마 원전사고에 대한 한국민의 위험판단 과정에 대한 분석: 휴리스틱-체계적 모형(HSM)에서 정보수신자의 관여와 능력의 역할을 중심으로" 정부학연구소 20 (20): 315-343, 2014

      2 김서용, "후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 원전사고와 원자력에 대한 위험판단 분석: 위험지각패러다임과 위험소통모형의 통합 적용을 통해" 한국행정연구원 23 (23): 113-143, 2014

      3 왕재선, "후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 원자력 수용성 및 인식구조 변화에 대한 탐색적 분석" 한국행정학회 47 (47): 395-424, 2013

      4 서혁준, "지역에너지 거버넌스 구축요인 분석" 한국지방행정연구원 28 (28): 283-312, 2014

      5 김서용, "위험과 편익을 넘어서: 원자력발전소 수용성에 대한 경험적 감정의 휴리스틱 효과" 한국행정학회 41 (41): 373-398, 2007

      6 김서용, "위험과 편익사이에서 : 방폐장 수용성의 결정요인에 대한 분석" 한국행정연구원 15 (15): 297-330, 2006

      7 임채홍, "원전비리 사건의 부정적 효과와 신뢰기제 분석" 한국행정연구원 23 (23): 131-159, 2014

      8 심준섭, "원자력발전소 주변 지역주민의 갈등 프레임 분석: 후쿠시마 원전사고의 영향을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 45 (45): 173-202, 2011

      9 유연재, "가치, 경험, 지각 - 원자력 수용성에서 가치 및 경험 기반 중층모형(Multi-layer Model)의 적합성에 대한 탐색적 연구-" 위기관리 이론과 실천 11 (11): 179-201, 2015

      10 Dake, K, "Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why" 119 (119): 41-60, 1990

      11 Renn, O, "The social amplification of risk: Theoretical foundations and empirical applications" 48 : 137-160, 1992

      12 Kasperson R. E, "The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework" 8 (8): 177-187, 1988

      13 Peters, E, "The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power" 26 (26): 1427-1453, 1996

      14 Zuckerman, M, "Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal" Hillsdale 1979

      15 Slovic, P, "Risk perception, trust, and nuclear waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain" 33 (33): 6-14, 1991

      16 Knuth, D, "Risk perception, experience, and objective risk: A cross-national study with European emergency survivors" 34 (34): 1286-1298, 2014

      17 Barnett J, "Risk perception and experience: hazard personality profiles and individual differences" 21 (21): 171-177, 2001

      18 Spangenberg, H. L, "Risk perception and emergency experience: comparing a representative German sample with German emergency survivors" 18 (18): 581-601, 2015

      19 Jenkins-Smith,. H. C, "Reversing nuclear opposition: evolving public acceptance of a permanent nuclear waste disposal facility" 31 (31): 629-644, 2011

      20 Twigger-Ross, C. L, "Relating risk experience, venturesomeness and risk perception" 2 (2): 73-83, 1999

      21 Hine, D. W, "Public opposition to a proposed nuclear waste repository in Canada: An investigation of cultural and economic effects" 17 (17): 293-302, 1997

      22 Kunreuther, H, "Public attitudes toward siting a high-level nuclear. waste repository in Nevada" 10 (10): 469-484, 1990

      23 Bassett, G. W, "On-site storage of high level nuclear waste: attitudes and perceptions of local residents" 16 (16): 309-319, 1996

      24 Van Der Linden, S, "On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change European Journal of Social Psychology" 44 : 430-440, 2014

      25 Department of Engineering and Public, "Nuclear Power and Communities" Department of Engineering and Public Policy 2009

      26 Katramiz, T, "Nuclear Power Plant, Risk and Human Security (A case study of Nuclear power site)"

      27 Siegrist, M, "Natural hazards and motivation for mitigation behavior: People cannot predict the affect evoked by a severe flood" 28 (28): 771-778, 2008

      28 Eiser, J. R, "Local residents’ attributions for nuclear decisions" 10 (10): 141-148, 1989

      29 Sjöberg, L, "Local acceptance of a high-level waste repository" 24 (24): 737-749, 2004

      30 Venables, D, "Living with nuclear power: a Q-method study of local community perceptions" 29 (29): 1089-1104, 2009

      31 Ho M-C, "How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception?" 28 (28): 635-643, 2008

      32 Lindell M. K, "Households’ perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment" 28 (28): 539-556, 2008

      33 Parkhill, K. A, "From the familiar to the extraordinary: local residents’ perceptions of risk when living with nuclear power in the UK Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers" 35 (35): 39-58, 2010

      34 Siegrist, M, "Flooding risks: A comparison of lay people’s perceptions and expert’s assessments in Switzerland" 26 : 971-979, 2006

      35 Tekeli-Yes¸ S, "Factors motivating individuals to take precautionary action for an expected earthquake in Istanbul" 30 (30): 1181-1195, 2010

      36 Richardson, B, "Explaining the social and psychological impacts of a nuclear power plant accident" 17 : 16-36, 1987

      37 Sjöberg, L, "Explaining Risk Perception. An Evaluation of the Psychometric Paradigm in Risk Perception Research" Norwegian University of Science and Technology 2004

      38 Williams, B. L, "Determinants of trust perceptions among residents surrounding the Savannah river nuclear weapons site" 31 (31): 354-371, 1999

      39 Litmanen, T, "Cultural approach to the perception of risk: Analysing concern about the siting of a high-level nuclear waste facility in Finland" 17 : 212-219, 1999

      40 Douglas, M, "Cultural Bias" Royal Anthropological Institute 1978

      41 Rohrmann, B, "Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies" Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

      42 Hughey, J. B, "Changing expectations: A longtitudinal study of community attitudes toward a nuclear power plant" 11 (11): 655-672, 1983

      43 Van Der Plight, J, "Attitudes toward nuclear energy: familiarity and salience" 18 (18): 75-93, 1986

      44 Sjöberg, L, "Attitude and risk perceptions of stakeholders in a nuclear waste siting issue" 23 (23): 739-749, 2003

      45 Whitmarsh, L, "Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response" 11 (11): 351-374, 2008

      46 Benthin, A, "A psychometric study of adolescent risk perception" 16 (16): 153-168, 1993

      47 Helweg-Larsen M, "(The lack of) optimistic biases in response to the 1994 Northridge earthquake: The role of personal experience" 21 (21): 119-129, 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.82 1.82 1.97
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.98 2.13 2.164 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼