RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      조직된 위선과 동아시아 지역통합 = 동아시아 지역통합의 제도적 저발전에 대한 이론적 소고

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82452884

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study provides a new theoretical interpretation of the institutional underdevelopment in East Asian integration. Although the processes of regional integration have been significantly improved in terms of the frequence and density of interactions among East Asian states since the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997, they have not been transformed into the process of institutionalizing the increased interdependence that means East Asian states’ collective actions for the reorganization of political authority beyond the national level. This study defines the peculiarity of regional integration in East Asia as the lack of political willingness for pooling national sovereignties among East Asian states. This peculiarity of East Asian regional integration can be better understood by the idea of East Asian states’ strategical actions to prefer the inconsistence between regionalization as the natural process of interdependence and regionalism as the political pursuit for transforming the East Asian international system based on the principle of Westphalian sovereignty rather than by the conventional explanations to emphasize the structural constrains externally imposed by the regional hegemone state such as the United States and the lack of homogeneity among East Asian States. Applying the concept of Organized hypocrisy developed by Krasner(1999), this study argues that East Asian states have pursued the enhanced durability of the Westphalian sovereignty norm that has long been deeply embedded in East Asia through organizing a hypocrisy of decoupling their rhetoric to express their strong commitment to regional integration from their actions of regionalizing political authority and institutionalizing interdependence beyond the norm of national sovereignty. In this regard, the process of regional integration in East Asia is not the process of overcoming nationalism, but that of expanding nationalism as a very important political tool for mobilizing political legitimacy for Eat Asian states into the region.
      번역하기

      This study provides a new theoretical interpretation of the institutional underdevelopment in East Asian integration. Although the processes of regional integration have been significantly improved in terms of the frequence and density of interactions...

      This study provides a new theoretical interpretation of the institutional underdevelopment in East Asian integration. Although the processes of regional integration have been significantly improved in terms of the frequence and density of interactions among East Asian states since the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997, they have not been transformed into the process of institutionalizing the increased interdependence that means East Asian states’ collective actions for the reorganization of political authority beyond the national level. This study defines the peculiarity of regional integration in East Asia as the lack of political willingness for pooling national sovereignties among East Asian states. This peculiarity of East Asian regional integration can be better understood by the idea of East Asian states’ strategical actions to prefer the inconsistence between regionalization as the natural process of interdependence and regionalism as the political pursuit for transforming the East Asian international system based on the principle of Westphalian sovereignty rather than by the conventional explanations to emphasize the structural constrains externally imposed by the regional hegemone state such as the United States and the lack of homogeneity among East Asian States. Applying the concept of Organized hypocrisy developed by Krasner(1999), this study argues that East Asian states have pursued the enhanced durability of the Westphalian sovereignty norm that has long been deeply embedded in East Asia through organizing a hypocrisy of decoupling their rhetoric to express their strong commitment to regional integration from their actions of regionalizing political authority and institutionalizing interdependence beyond the norm of national sovereignty. In this regard, the process of regional integration in East Asia is not the process of overcoming nationalism, but that of expanding nationalism as a very important political tool for mobilizing political legitimacy for Eat Asian states into the region.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 기존 연구 검토와 새로운 접근법
      • Ⅲ. 조직된 위선과 동아시아 지역통합
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 기존 연구 검토와 새로운 접근법
      • Ⅲ. 조직된 위선과 동아시아 지역통합
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • abstracts
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최태욱, "한 미 FTA와 동아시아 지역주의"

      2 조재욱, "중·일 협조체제와 동아시아 지역경제통합: 일본리더십 한계를 중심으로" 세종연구소 14 (14): 63-88, 2008

      3 최원식, "제국 이후의 동아시아" 창작과 비평 2009

      4 이대우, "이명박 정부 신아시아 외교구상" 13-15, 2009

      5 류준필, "분단체제론과 동아시아론" 아세아문제연구소 52 (52): 38-72, 2009

      6 김기석, "반응국가로부터 지역패권 국가로?패권체제의 변화, 경제위기 그리고 일본 대외경제정책" 극동문제연구소 22 (22): 119-152, 2006

      7 나종석, "동아시아공동체의 정체성형성의 문제, in: 동아시아공동체 논의의 현황과 전망" 동북아역사재단 2009

      8 한석희, "동아시아공동체 형성과 중국의 인식: EAS에 대한 정책적 함의" 한국정치학회 43 (43): 283-300, 2009

      9 동북아역사재단, "동아시아공동체 논의의 현황과 전망" 동북아역사재단 2009

      10 문우식, "동아시아 역내금융협력의 추진 현황과 과제, in: 동아시아 공동체" 한양대 출판부 2005

      1 최태욱, "한 미 FTA와 동아시아 지역주의"

      2 조재욱, "중·일 협조체제와 동아시아 지역경제통합: 일본리더십 한계를 중심으로" 세종연구소 14 (14): 63-88, 2008

      3 최원식, "제국 이후의 동아시아" 창작과 비평 2009

      4 이대우, "이명박 정부 신아시아 외교구상" 13-15, 2009

      5 류준필, "분단체제론과 동아시아론" 아세아문제연구소 52 (52): 38-72, 2009

      6 김기석, "반응국가로부터 지역패권 국가로?패권체제의 변화, 경제위기 그리고 일본 대외경제정책" 극동문제연구소 22 (22): 119-152, 2006

      7 나종석, "동아시아공동체의 정체성형성의 문제, in: 동아시아공동체 논의의 현황과 전망" 동북아역사재단 2009

      8 한석희, "동아시아공동체 형성과 중국의 인식: EAS에 대한 정책적 함의" 한국정치학회 43 (43): 283-300, 2009

      9 동북아역사재단, "동아시아공동체 논의의 현황과 전망" 동북아역사재단 2009

      10 문우식, "동아시아 역내금융협력의 추진 현황과 과제, in: 동아시아 공동체" 한양대 출판부 2005

      11 박승우, "동아시아 담론의 현황과 문제, in: 동아시아 공동체와 한국의 미래" 이매진 310-321, 2008

      12 동아시아 공동체연구회, "동아시아 공동체와 한국의 미래" 이매진 2008

      13 신윤환, "동남아의 지역주의와 “동아시아 공동체”: 그 역사에 대한 재해석" 동아연구소 (56) : 107-137, 2009

      14 Friedberg, Aaron L., "Will Europe’s Past be Asia’s Future?" 42 (42): 147-160, 2002

      15 Acharya, Amitav, "Will Asia’s Past Be Its Future?" 28 (28): 149-164, 2003

      16 Hemmer, Christopher, "Why is There No NATO in Asia? : Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism" 56 (56): 575-607, 2002

      17 Lipson, Michael, "Varieties of Organized Hypocrisy" 2008

      18 Armitage, Richard L., "The U.S.-Japan Alliance: Getting Asia Right through 2020, CSIS Report" 2007

      19 Miller, John, "The Roots and Implications of East Asian Regionalism" Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies 2004

      20 Brunsson, Nils, "The Organization of Hypocrisy" Copenhagen Business School Press 2002

      21 Hooghe, Lisbet, "The Neofunctionalist Were(almost) Right: Politicization and European Integration, Constitutionalism Web-Papers" 2-19, 2005

      22 Krasner, Stephen D., "The Case for Shared Sovereignty" 16 (16): 2005

      23 Grieco, Joseph M., "Systematic Sources of Variation in Regional Institutionalization in Western Europe, Asia and the Americas, in: The Political Economy of Regionalism" Columbia University Press 164-187, 1997

      24 Krasner, Stephen D., "Sovereignty, Organized Hypocrisy" Princeton University Press 1999

      25 Wendt, Alexander, "Social Theory of International Politics" Cambridge University Press 1999

      26 Barry, Buzan, "Regions and Powers: The structure of International Security" Cambridge University Press 2003

      27 Munakata, Naoko, "Regionalization and Regionalism: The Mutual Interaction" 2004

      28 Samuel S. Kim, "Regionalization and Regionalism in East Asia" 동아시아연구원 4 (4): 39-68, 2004

      29 Samuel S. Kim, "Regionalization and Regionalism in East Asia" 동아시아연구원 4 (4): 39-68, 2004

      30 Fawcett, Louise, "Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order" Oxford University Press 2003

      31 Kent Calder, "Regionalism and Critical Junctures: Explaining the "Organization Gap" in Northeast Asia" 동아시아연구원 4 (4): 191-226, 2004

      32 Katzenstein, Peter, "Regionalism and Asia" 5 (5): 353-368, 2000

      33 Fort, Bertrand, "Regional Integration in Europe and East Asia: Convergence or Divergence?" Routledge 2006

      34 Inglehart, Ronald, "Public Opinion and Regional Integration, in: Regional Integration: Theory and Research" Harvard University Press 182-190, 1970

      35 Lipson, Michael, "Peacekeeping: Organized Hypocrisy?" 13 : 5-34, 2007

      36 Krasner, Stephen D., "Organized Hypocrisy in Nineteenth-Century East Asia" 1 : 173-197, 2001

      37 Francois, Joseph, "National Strategies for Regional Integration" Asian Development Bank 2009

      38 Katzenstein, Peter, "Introduction: Asian Regionalism in Comparative Perspective, in: Network Power: Japan and Asia" Cornell University Press 1-46, 1997

      39 Frankel, Jeffrey, "Introduction to Regionalism and Rivalry: Japan and the United States in Pacific Asia" 1-18, 1993

      40 Ikenberry, G. John, "International Relation Theory and the Asian-Pacific" Columbia University Press 2003

      41 Fawcett, Louise, "Exploring Regional Domains: A Comparative History of Regionalism" 80 (80): 429-446, 2004

      42 Hurrell, Andrew, "Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics" 21 : 331-358, 1995

      43 Ravenhill, John, "East Asian Regionalism: Much Ado about Nothing?" 35 (35): 215-235, 2009

      44 He, Baogang, "East Asian Ideas of Regionalism: A Normative Critique" 58 (58): 105-125, 2004

      45 Inoguchi, Takashi, "Does Identity Matter in Facilitating or Hindering Regional Cooperation in East Asia?" 2003

      46 Corbey, Dorette, "Dialectical Functionalism: Stagnation as a Booster of European Integration" 49 (49): 253-284, 1995

      47 Jones, M. D., "Constructing Communities: the Curious Case of East Asian Regionalism" 33 : 165-186, 2007

      48 Acharya, Amitav, "Comparing Regional Institutions: An Introduction, in: Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective" Cambridge University Press 1-31, 2007

      49 Choi, Young Jong, "Comparative Regional Integration, in: Handbook of International Relations" Sage 480-499, 2002

      50 Wendt, Alexander, "Collective Identity Formation and the International State" 88 (88): 384-396, 1994

      51 Aggarwal, Vinod K., "Beyond network power? The dynamics of formal economic integration in Northeast Asia" 18 (18): 189-216, 2005

      52 Bernard, Mitchell, "Beyond Product Cycles and Flying Geese: Regionalization, Hierarchy, and the Industrialization of East Asia" 47 : 1995

      53 Beeson, Mark, "Asia’s odd men out: Australia, Japan, and the Politics of Regionalism" 7 : 227-250, 2007

      54 Beeson, Mark, "ASEAN Plus Three and the Rise of Reactionary Regionalism" 25 (25): 251-261, 2003

      55 Ravenhill, John, "APEC and The Construction of Pacific Rim Regionalism" Cambridge University Press 2001

      56 Ravenhill, John, "A Three Bloc World: The New East Asian World" 2 : 167-195, 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2020-04-22 학회명변경 한글명 : 아세아문제연구소 -> 아세아문제연구원
      영문명 : Asiatic Research Center -> Asiatic Research Institute
      KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-10-10 학술지명변경 한글명 : 亞細亞 硏究 -> 아세아연구
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Asiatic Studies
      KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.76 0.76 0.64
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.54 0.56 1.013 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼