RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    인터넷광고의 디자인 복잡성과 집중도가 광고효과에 미치는 영향

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101726372

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Reviewing the preceding research found relative variables of the advertising hierarchy effect including internet advertising`s complexity, attention, connect time, attitude, and involvement. This paper`s object proves that internet advertising`s complexity and attention variables influences advertising and brand attitude, purchase intention as if exists in advertising media. And so what is the main cause of internet advertising`s complexity and attention? The research conducted provides a relatively controllable environment where computers are available for subjects to use. A total of 320 subjects took part in the experiment to each of the three treatments. The hypothesis 1 proves that a higher level of internet advertising design complexity produces a higher positive relation advertising attention. The hypothesis 2 proves that a higher level of internet advertising attention produces a higher positive relation advertising attitude. The hypothesis 3 proves that a the attitudes toward internet advertising were shown to have a very high degree of relation with attitude toward brands, and purchase intention, verifying that the hierarchy-of-effects is in force. Although the theory that such layer efficacy can be applied in the existing media is a prevailing one, it could also be shown that it also applies to internet advertising as well. In other words, the hierarchy- of-effects was confirmed to have its presence felt in the form of advertising attitude→brand attitude→purchase intention, all regarding internet advertising. Moreover, design complex internet advertisements with a diverse range of changes elicited more favorable responses than simple ones. This result can be attributed to the fact that internet users are more likely to selectively accommodate and digest information on their own rather than being dictated by a theory where complexity imbues negativity. The attention to the commercial were shown to have a high degree of relation with attitudes toward internet advertising.
    번역하기

    Reviewing the preceding research found relative variables of the advertising hierarchy effect including internet advertising`s complexity, attention, connect time, attitude, and involvement. This paper`s object proves that internet advertising`s compl...

    Reviewing the preceding research found relative variables of the advertising hierarchy effect including internet advertising`s complexity, attention, connect time, attitude, and involvement. This paper`s object proves that internet advertising`s complexity and attention variables influences advertising and brand attitude, purchase intention as if exists in advertising media. And so what is the main cause of internet advertising`s complexity and attention? The research conducted provides a relatively controllable environment where computers are available for subjects to use. A total of 320 subjects took part in the experiment to each of the three treatments. The hypothesis 1 proves that a higher level of internet advertising design complexity produces a higher positive relation advertising attention. The hypothesis 2 proves that a higher level of internet advertising attention produces a higher positive relation advertising attitude. The hypothesis 3 proves that a the attitudes toward internet advertising were shown to have a very high degree of relation with attitude toward brands, and purchase intention, verifying that the hierarchy-of-effects is in force. Although the theory that such layer efficacy can be applied in the existing media is a prevailing one, it could also be shown that it also applies to internet advertising as well. In other words, the hierarchy- of-effects was confirmed to have its presence felt in the form of advertising attitude→brand attitude→purchase intention, all regarding internet advertising. Moreover, design complex internet advertisements with a diverse range of changes elicited more favorable responses than simple ones. This result can be attributed to the fact that internet users are more likely to selectively accommodate and digest information on their own rather than being dictated by a theory where complexity imbues negativity. The attention to the commercial were shown to have a high degree of relation with attitudes toward internet advertising.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 귄희정, "인터넷광고 효과에 미치는 상호작용성의 영향" (43) : 1998

    2 최환진, "인터넷 광고의 효과과정에 관한 연구-웹사이트의 상호작용성을 중심으로" 경희대학교 1999

    3 노병환, "웹사이트의 시각적 요소가 커뮤니케이션에 미치는 영향" 14 : 2001

    4 조윤식, "웹사이트에 대한 태도,광고에 대한 태도,광고에 대한 집중도,상표에 대한 태도 및 구매의도와의 관계에 관한 연구" 7 : 2001

    5 김종우, "마케팅과학연구"

    6 박종민, "구매결정에 미치는 소비자의 브랜드,브랜드광고 그리고 기업 명성광고에 대한 태도의 통로분석 연구" (49) : 2000

    7 원종열, "광고디자인의 표현에 있어서 단순성에 관한연구" 3 : 1998

    8 "http://www.nua.net"

    9 "http//banner.co.kr/artl.html"

    10 BrunerⅡ, G. C, "Web Commercials and Advertising Hierarchy-of-Effects" 40 : 2000

    1 귄희정, "인터넷광고 효과에 미치는 상호작용성의 영향" (43) : 1998

    2 최환진, "인터넷 광고의 효과과정에 관한 연구-웹사이트의 상호작용성을 중심으로" 경희대학교 1999

    3 노병환, "웹사이트의 시각적 요소가 커뮤니케이션에 미치는 영향" 14 : 2001

    4 조윤식, "웹사이트에 대한 태도,광고에 대한 태도,광고에 대한 집중도,상표에 대한 태도 및 구매의도와의 관계에 관한 연구" 7 : 2001

    5 김종우, "마케팅과학연구"

    6 박종민, "구매결정에 미치는 소비자의 브랜드,브랜드광고 그리고 기업 명성광고에 대한 태도의 통로분석 연구" (49) : 2000

    7 원종열, "광고디자인의 표현에 있어서 단순성에 관한연구" 3 : 1998

    8 "http://www.nua.net"

    9 "http//banner.co.kr/artl.html"

    10 BrunerⅡ, G. C, "Web Commercials and Advertising Hierarchy-of-Effects" 40 : 2000

    11 Petty, R. E, "Thought Disruption and Persuasion:Assessing the Validity of Attitude Change Experiments" in Cognitive Response in Persuasion 1981

    12 Berthon, P, "The World Wide Web as an Advertising Medium: Toward an Understanding of Conversion Efficiency" 1996

    13 Davis, J, "The Web Design Wow!Book: Showcase the Best of On-Screen Communication" Peachpit Press 1999

    14 Mackenzie, S. B, "The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations" 23 : 1986

    15 Singh, S. N, "The Effects of Length,Content,and Reception on Television Commercials Effectiveness" 30 : 1993

    16 BrunerⅡ, G. C, "Standardization & Justification: Do Aad Scales Measure Up?」" 20 : 1-, 1998

    17 Lake, D, "Marketing Spotlight:Internet Ad Spending Keeps Climbing" 2 : 25-, 1999

    18 Reed, M, "Going beyond the Banner Ad" Marketing 1999

    19 Dinucci, D, "Elements of Web Design" Peach Press 1997

    20 Cohen, J. B, "Attitude, Affect, and Behavior, Affect and Social Behavior" Cambridge: Cambridge Press 1987

    21 Berlyne, D. E. Conflict, "Arousal, and Curiosity" New York, McGraw-Hall 1960

    22 Mitchell, A. A, "Are product Attribute Beliefs the only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?" 15 : 1981

    23 Bettman, J. R, "An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice, Reading" MA : Addison-Wesley 1979

    24 Briggs, R, "Advertising on the Web: Is There Response before Click through?」" 37 (37): 1997

    25 Barry, T, "A Review and Critique of the Hierarchy of Effects Advertising"

    26 Lavidge, R. J, "A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness" 25 : 1961

    27 한국인터넷정보센터, "2008년 인터넷 이용실태조사"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.6 0.6 0.54
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.52 0.5 0.732 0.06
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼