성육신에 대한 신학적 반성 = A Theological Reflection on the Incarnation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The doctrine of the incarnation is central to the traditional Christian faith as held by the Catholic Church, the Orthodox Church, and most Protestants. Historically this doctrine has been developed into the Dogma of Chalcedon. Through this process the question of Jesus`s nature, closed with the defeat of Arianism in 380, had been reopened and answered. In this paper, I have attempted to make clear the theological thinking of the incarnation, especially the dogma of Chalcedon, so that we could find the way to make an approach to the reality of the incarnation. The result is as follows. First, the dogma of Chalcedon, True God, and at the same time true man, negatively can be defined as an attempt to prevent from gnosticism and adoptionism, but positively as an attempt to unite the interest of Alexandrian theology and of Anthiochean theology. According to the doctrine of the Chalcedon, Jesus is both mediator and savior. Second, the representatives of the modern theology accept the meaning of the Chalcedon, although they reinterpret this dogma newly in the light of New Testament. They agree on the maintenance that Jesus is the true man, and this realized man is at the same time the self-realization of God. Here the thinking of kenosis can help to understand this paradoxical thinking. Nobody couldn`t deny its contribution to the christology. The Chalcedon contributes to the understanding of the faith that Jesus is God for us. Nevertheless it proved to be true that the dogma of Chalcedon is short of the cosmic eschatology of early church that can never be distinguished from the christology. We must accept the eschatological meaning of Messiah-Christology, that regards Jesus as the Vorwegnahme of Eschaton, in which God will be all in all(1 Corinthians 15,28). This problem leads us to reflect on the biblical thinking of incarnation. Here this paper suggests the possibility of the Body-Christology, which considers the essence of Jesus not as the true man but as the body(John 1,14; Colossians 2,9). This christology finally describes the reality of Jesus in terms of the kingdom of God that contains the cosmic eschatology. So this paper argues that the doctrine of incarnation is an attempt to realize and actualize the Messiah-Christology.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 녹케, "종말론" 서울: 성바오로 1998

2 라쿠나, "우리를 위한 하나님-삼위일체와 그리스도인의 삶" 서울: 대한기독교서회 2008

3 본회퍼, "옥중서신" 서울: 대한기독교서회 1967

4 몰트만, "오늘 우리에게 예수는 누구인가?" 서울: 대한기독교서회 1997

5 몰트만, "예수 그리스도의 길" 서울: 대한기독교서회 1990

6 펠리칸, "예수 그리스도 2000" 서울: 동연 1999

7 카스퍼, "예수 그리스도" 왜관: 분도출판사 1996

8 본회퍼, "신도의 공동생활" 서울: 대한기독교서회 1964

9 몰트만, "삼위일체와 하나님의 나라" 서울: 대한기독교서회 1982

10 본회퍼, "그리스도론" 서울: 대한기독교서회 1979

11 펠리칸, "고대교회 교리사" 서울: 크라스챤 다이제스트 1995

12 Ott, Heinrich, "Zweiter Band: Der persönliche Gott" Göttingen Zürich: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1969

13 Rahner, Karl, "Zur Theolgie der Menschwerdung, In Schriften zur Theologie" Bd. I V. Einsiedeln Zürich Köln: Benziger Verlag 1962

14 Tillich, Paul, "Systematic Theology, vol. 2" Chicago: The university of Chicago press 1957

15 Barth, K, "Kirchliche Dogmatik I V" Aufl. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag 1982

16 Pannenberg, Wolfhart, "Grunzüge der Christologie" Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlaghaus 1964

17 Studer,Basil, "Gott und unsere Erlösung im Glauben der alten Kirche" Düsseldorf: Patmos Verlag 1985

18 Asmussen, Hans, "Gespräch zwischen der Konfessionen" Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Bücherei KG 1959

19 Brunner, E, "Das Ewige als Zukunft und Gegenwart" Zürich: Zwingli Verlag 1953

20 Lohse, "Aufl" Aufl. Stuttgart: Kreuz Verlg 1988