RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    제국 일본의 종교 정책: 식민지에 적용한 포교 관련 규칙을 중심으로 = Legal Regulation of Religion in Imperial Japan: A Study of Missionary Rules in the Colonial Context

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110123825

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines the legal structure of religious control in modern Imperial Japan by comparing the rules and regulations governing proselytization enacted in both mainland Japan and its colonies. In Japan, following repeated failures to enact a Religious Organizations Law, religious activities were regulated through lower-level administrative ordinances issued by the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Education. In contrast, the colonies developed distinct legal systems that did not simply transplant these metropolitan norms but rather adapted them to local political and religious conditions. Notably, the Government-General of Korea, the Karafuto Agency, and the South Seas Bureau adopted the 1915 “Regulations on Missionary Work” as a common legal framework, displaying similar structures despite differences such as the presence or absence of the concept of “pseudo-religious organizations.” On the other hand, Taiwan, the Kwantung Leased Territory, and Manchukuo built their systems primarily on Taiwan’s earlier temple regulations, focusing on spatial control and public security. Among them, Korea institutionalized a legal distinction between “recognized religions” and “pseudo-religious organizations,” thereby reinforcing control over indigenous religious movements—a framework that later influenced religious policy in Manchukuo and even in mainland Japan. Through this comparative analysis, the study argues that Imperial Japan’s legal regulation of religion was not a uniform imperial code but rather a differentiated system of control shaped by the specific strategic needs of each colonial territory.
    번역하기

    This study examines the legal structure of religious control in modern Imperial Japan by comparing the rules and regulations governing proselytization enacted in both mainland Japan and its colonies. In Japan, following repeated failures to enact a Re...

    This study examines the legal structure of religious control in modern Imperial Japan by comparing the rules and regulations governing proselytization enacted in both mainland Japan and its colonies. In Japan, following repeated failures to enact a Religious Organizations Law, religious activities were regulated through lower-level administrative ordinances issued by the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Education. In contrast, the colonies developed distinct legal systems that did not simply transplant these metropolitan norms but rather adapted them to local political and religious conditions. Notably, the Government-General of Korea, the Karafuto Agency, and the South Seas Bureau adopted the 1915 “Regulations on Missionary Work” as a common legal framework, displaying similar structures despite differences such as the presence or absence of the concept of “pseudo-religious organizations.” On the other hand, Taiwan, the Kwantung Leased Territory, and Manchukuo built their systems primarily on Taiwan’s earlier temple regulations, focusing on spatial control and public security. Among them, Korea institutionalized a legal distinction between “recognized religions” and “pseudo-religious organizations,” thereby reinforcing control over indigenous religious movements—a framework that later influenced religious policy in Manchukuo and even in mainland Japan. Through this comparative analysis, the study argues that Imperial Japan’s legal regulation of religion was not a uniform imperial code but rather a differentiated system of control shaped by the specific strategic needs of each colonial territory.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼