RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Dynamic Coronary 320-Row CT Angiography Using Low-Dose Contrast and Temporal Maximum Intensity Projection: A Comparison with Standard Coronary CT Angiography

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108194075

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: The smallest diagnostically sufficient amount of contrast media (CM) should be used for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to minimize the risk of contrast- induced nephrotoxicity in elderly patients with coronary artery diseas...

      Objective: The smallest diagnostically sufficient amount of contrast media (CM) should be used for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to minimize the risk of contrast- induced nephrotoxicity in elderly patients with coronary artery disease. The purpose of this study was to propose dynamic-CCTA using a low dose of CM and temporal maximum intensity projection (TMIP) and to investigate its image quality compared to standard-CCTA.
      Materials and Methods: Participants comprised 30 patients with coronary artery disease who underwent dynamic-CCTA and standard-CCTA using 320-row CT. Dynamic-CCTA was continuously performed at mid-diastole throughout 15–25 cardiac cycles after bolus injection of CM [103 mg iodine/kg body weight (mgI/kg)]. TMIP-CCTA was reconstructed from three-phase dynamic-CCTA data, including a phase with peak enhancement of the ascending aorta. Standard-CCTA was performed using a standard CM dose (259 mgI/kg). Image quality of both TMIP-CCTA and standard-CCTA was analyzed.
      Results: The amount of CM used in TMIP-CCTA and standard-CCTA was 16.2±2.6 mL and 40.1±7.3 mL, respectively. The mean effective radiation dose was not significantly different between the two methods. Mean coronary attenuation was significantly lower for TMIP-CCTA than standard-CCTA [346.9±82.8 Hounsfield units (HU) vs. 455.4±75.3 HU, p<0.05]. Image noise was significantly lower for TMIP-CCTA than standard-CCTA (20.0±3.2 HU vs. 28.1± 3.6 HU, p<0.05). There were no differences in signal-to-noise ratio and visual assessment scores between the two methods.
      Conclusion: TMIP-CCTA can be performed using more than 50% less CM with the same image quality as standard-CCTA.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼