정당지도부의 국회 본회의 대정부질문자 선정 요인: 제16대~제19대 국회를 중심으로 = The Factor of the Party Leadership's Selection of Interpellator: Focusing on the 16th to 19th National Assembly

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The floor leader of a political party has the authority to select the interpellators among its members. Why are some members selected as the interpellators several times during their term of office, while others are not selected as them even once? The purpose of this article is to analyze which members are selected as them in the 16th to 19th National Assembly. I argue that the district representatives, term, party leadership position affect the selection of them. The empirical results show that the member elected by the single member district, low-term members and member of the party leadership were often selected as them. In addition, depending on the ruling and opposition parties, there was a difference in the effect of district representatives and party leadership position on the selection of interpellators. On the other hand, there was a high probability that the freshmen would be selected as an interpellators in the ruling and opposition parties. Also, the interpellators of the two major parties are ideologically polarized. The significance of this study is that it attempted empirical analysis by establishing a database on the interpellators.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

정당의 원내대표는 대정부질문자로 나설 의원들을 선정하는데, 왜 어떤 의원은 임기 동안 여러 차례 대정부질문자로 선정되는 반면에, 어떤 의원은 단 한 차례도 대정부질문자로선정되지 못하는가? 본 연구의 목적은 제16대~제19대 국회에서 어떤 의원들이 대정부질문자로 많이 선정되는지를 분석하는데 있다. 본 연구는 의원의 지역구 대표 여부, 선수, 원내· 외 당직이 대정부질문자 선정에 영향을 미친다고 주장한다. 분석결과, 지역구 의원, 초선의원, 원내·외 당직을 맡은 의원이 대정부질문자로 선정되는 횟수가 많았다. 그리고 여야에따라 지역구 대표와 당직이 대정부질문자 선정에 미치는 영향에 차이가 있었다. 반면에, 선수의 효과는 여야에서 모두 초선의원이 높게 나타났다. 또한, 거대 양당의 대정부질문자로 나선 의원들 간에는 이념적 양극화가 뚜렷했다. 본 연구의 의의는 최초로 대정부질문자에 관한 데이터베이스를 구축하여 경험적인 분석을 시도했다는데 있다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박상운 ; 이호준, "현직자 우위의 구성요소: 한국의 제18, 19대 국회의원선거에 대한 경험적 분석" 사회과학연구소 31 (31): 393-410, 2015

2 김병준, "행정부에 대한 국회의 영향력: 본회의 대정부 질문의 분석" 23 : 3-19, 1989

3 박찬욱, "한국 의회정치의 특성" 1 (1): 14-38, 1995

4 손병권, "한국 의회정치와 제도개혁" 한울 2004

5 임성호, "한국 의회민주주의와 국회제도 개혁방안" 4 (4): 112-137, 1998

6 국회사무처, "제19대 국회사"

7 국회사무처, "제18대 국회사"

8 전진영, "제18대 국회 원내정당의 정당응집성 분석" 한국정당학회 9 (9): 119-139, 2010

9 국회사무처, "제17대 국회사"

10 국회사무처, "제16대 국회사"

11 이헌승 의원실, "이헌승 2020 의정보고서" 이헌승 의원실 2020

12 김민전, "의원의 정당충성도, 이념성, 그리고 재선(reelection)결과 -18대 국회의원선거를 중심으로-" 한국의회발전연구회 14 (14): 31-59, 2008

13 박준, "사회갈등지수와 갈등비용 추정" KIPA 1-318, 2018

14 김형철, "민주주의 강의3: 제도" 오름 2009

15 문우진, "다당제에서의 당파표결과 정당충성도: 17대 및 18대 전반국회 분석" 한국의회발전연구회 17 (17): 5-40, 2011

16 "네이버"

17 김형준, "국회의 효율성 제고 방안" 한국정치학회 2005

18 임동갑, "국회와 정부의 견제와 균형에 관한 연구" 경영정보연구원 2012

19 장훈, "국회·대통령·정당의 상생 관계의 모색 등에 관한 연구" 한국의회발전연구회 2008

20 국회 홈페이지, "국회 본회의 회의록"

21 이희연, "고급통계분석론" 문우사 2013

22 Crisp, Brian F., "Vote-Seeking Incentives and Legislative Representation in Six Presidential Democracies" 66 (66): 823-846, 2004

23 Martin, Shane, "Using Parliamentary Questions to Measure Constituency Focus:An Application to the Irish Case" 59 : 472-488, 2011

24 Maltzman, Forrest, "The Politics of Talk: Unconstrained Floor Time in the U.S. House of Representatives" 58 (58): 819-830, 1996

25 Cain, Bruce, "The Personal Vote:Constituency Service and Electoral Independence" Harvard University Press 1987

26 Levitt, Steven D., "The Impact of Federal Spending on House Election Outcomes" 105 (105): 30-53, 1997

27 Russo, Federico, "The Constituency as a Focus of Representation: Studying the Italian Case through the Analysis of Parliamentary Questions" 17 (17): 290-301, 2011

28 Shomer, Yael, "The Conditional Effect of Electoral Systems and Intraparty Candidate Selection Processes on Parties' Behavior" 42 (42): 63-96, 2017

29 Hill, Kim Quaile, "Symbolic Speeches in the U.S. Senate and Their Representational Implications" 64 (64): 219-231, 2002

30 Stokes, Donald E, "Spatial Models of Party Competition" 57 (57): 368-377, 1963

31 Papp, Zsóofia, "Shadowing the elected: mixed-member incentives to locally oriented parliamentary questioning" 22 (22): 216-236, 2016

32 Giannetti, Daniela, "Rules and Speeches_How Parliamentary Rules Affect Legislators' Speech‐Making Behavior" 41 (41): 771-800, 2016

33 Fiorina, Morris P., "Retrospective voting in American national elections" Yale University Press 1981

34 Morris, Jonathan S, "Reexamining the Politics of Talk: Partisan Rhetoric in the 104th House" 26 (26): 101-121, 2001

35 Dios, Manuel Sáanchez de, "Questioning in European Parliaments" 17 (17): 354-367, 2011

36 Rozenberg, Olivier, "Questioning Parliamentary Questions" 17 (17): 394-404, 2011

37 Ferejohn, John A., "Pork Barrel Politics: Rivers and Harbors Legislation, 1947-1968" Stanford University Press 1974

38 Stratmann, Thomas, "Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral Systems" 46 (46): 506-514, 2002

39 Ono, Yoshikuni, "Personal Attributes of Legislators and Parliamentary Behavior:An Analysis of Parliamentary Activities among Japanese Legislators" 16 (16): 68-95, 2015

40 Bailer, Stefanie, "People's Voice or Information Pool? The Role of, and Reasons for, Parliamentary Questions in the Swiss Parliament" 17 (17): 302-314, 2011

41 Morgenstern, Scott, "Patterns of Legislative Politics" Cambridge University Press 2004

42 Rich, Timothy S, "Party Voting Cohesion in Mixed Member Legislative Systems" 39 (39): 113-135, 2014

43 Alemán, Eduardo, "Party Strategies, Constituency Links, and Legislative Speech" 42 (42): 637-659, 2017

44 Hall, Richard L., "Participation in Congress" Yale University Press 1996

45 Otjes, Simon, "Parliamentary questions as strategic party tools" 41 (41): 496-516, 2018

46 Salmond, Rob, "Parliamentary Question Times: How Legislative Accountability Mechanisms Affect Mass Political Engagement" 20 (20): 321-341, 2014

47 Rozenberg, Olivier, "Not Only a Battleground: Parliamentary Oral Questions Concerning Defence Policies in Four Western Democracies" 17 (17): 340-353, 2011

48 Hilbe, Joseph, "Negative Binomial Regression" Cambridge University Press 2011

49 Carey, John M., "Legislative Voting and Accountability" Cambridge University Press 2009

50 Cox, Gary W., "Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in The House" University of California Press 1993

51 Shepsle, Kenneth A, "Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models" 23 (23): 27-59, 1979

52 Carey, John M., "Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas" 14 (14): 417-439, 1995

53 White, John Kenneth, "Handbook of Party Politics" SAGE Publications 2006

54 Jun, Hae-Won and Hix, "Electoral Systems, Political Career Paths and Legislative Behavior: Evidence from South Korea's Mixed-Member System" 11 (11): 153-171, 2010

55 Fernandes, Jorge M., "Election Proximity and Representation Focus in Party-Constrained Environments" 24 (24): 674-685, 2018

56 Miller, Warren E., "Constituency Influence in Congress" 57 (57): 45-56, 1963

57 Mayhew, David R., "Congress: The Electoral Connection" Yale University Press 1974

58 Dalton, Russell J., "Citizen politics: public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies" SAGE, CQ Press 2014

59 Akirav, Osnat, "Candidate Selection and a Crowded Parliament-The Israeli Knesset, 1988-2006" 16 (16): 96-120, 2010

60 Rasch, Bjørn Erik, "Behavioural Consequences of Restrictions on Plenary Access-Parliamentary Questions in the Norwegian Storting" 17 (17): 382-393, 2011

61 Downs, Anthony, "An economic theory of democracy" Harper 1957