RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국내 다문화교육지원기관의 제도화 및 재맥락화 = The Institutionalization and Recontextualization of Multicultural Education Centers in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99672218

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      As an exploratory investigation, this study attends to the institutionalization and (re)contextualization of multicultural education centers in Korea over the past two decades (1991-2010). A set of empirical data for this study was gathered from various official sources, primarily the websites of multicultural education centers. The research questions are as follows: 1. What has been the driving force behind the institutionalization of multicultural centers in Korea? 2. How has the function of multicultural centers been contextualized in Korea? With regard to the research question 1, the data analyzed in this study shed light on the possibility that the institutionalization of multicultural centers in Korea has been responsive to a collection of “universal discourses” on multiculturalism that have been elaborated and disseminated on a global scale. The data indicate that the official mission statements of those centers frequently emphasize notions such as global human rights, global community, and cultural diversity, all of which represent some of the central elements of global epistemic models of multiculturalism. One way to interpret this finding may be that the perceived needs for multicultural education centers in Korea have largely been socially constructed based on global discourses on multiculturalism, fairly independent of substantive societal needs for them. As for the research question 2, a series of analyses of the data points to the possibility that the content of the programs in multicultural education centers in Korea is “loosely coupled” with the official missions. An illustrative example of such a loose coupling is that many of those centers have been focusing their educational programs on Korean cultural elements, while their official mission statements ostensively emphasize universal cultural norms and values. In addition, the data show a strong correlation between the number of multicultural education centers and the size of cultural minority groups (e.g., foreign workers, marriage immigrants, and North Korean defectors) across different parts of Korea. These findings may lead one to suspect that the function of those centers has been recontextualized in a way to assimilate cultural minority groups into the dominant Korean culture. Overall, the findings from this study suggest that the rise and diffusion of multicultural education centers in Korea may not simply be a functional response to concrete societal needs within the country, but a reflection of global epistemic models that help us reinterpret and render new meaning to diversity in society. This study hopes to provoke further inquiry into the relationship between multicultural education and global-local processes from a world-society perspective.
      번역하기

      As an exploratory investigation, this study attends to the institutionalization and (re)contextualization of multicultural education centers in Korea over the past two decades (1991-2010). A set of empirical data for this study was gathered from vario...

      As an exploratory investigation, this study attends to the institutionalization and (re)contextualization of multicultural education centers in Korea over the past two decades (1991-2010). A set of empirical data for this study was gathered from various official sources, primarily the websites of multicultural education centers. The research questions are as follows: 1. What has been the driving force behind the institutionalization of multicultural centers in Korea? 2. How has the function of multicultural centers been contextualized in Korea? With regard to the research question 1, the data analyzed in this study shed light on the possibility that the institutionalization of multicultural centers in Korea has been responsive to a collection of “universal discourses” on multiculturalism that have been elaborated and disseminated on a global scale. The data indicate that the official mission statements of those centers frequently emphasize notions such as global human rights, global community, and cultural diversity, all of which represent some of the central elements of global epistemic models of multiculturalism. One way to interpret this finding may be that the perceived needs for multicultural education centers in Korea have largely been socially constructed based on global discourses on multiculturalism, fairly independent of substantive societal needs for them. As for the research question 2, a series of analyses of the data points to the possibility that the content of the programs in multicultural education centers in Korea is “loosely coupled” with the official missions. An illustrative example of such a loose coupling is that many of those centers have been focusing their educational programs on Korean cultural elements, while their official mission statements ostensively emphasize universal cultural norms and values. In addition, the data show a strong correlation between the number of multicultural education centers and the size of cultural minority groups (e.g., foreign workers, marriage immigrants, and North Korean defectors) across different parts of Korea. These findings may lead one to suspect that the function of those centers has been recontextualized in a way to assimilate cultural minority groups into the dominant Korean culture. Overall, the findings from this study suggest that the rise and diffusion of multicultural education centers in Korea may not simply be a functional response to concrete societal needs within the country, but a reflection of global epistemic models that help us reinterpret and render new meaning to diversity in society. This study hopes to provoke further inquiry into the relationship between multicultural education and global-local processes from a world-society perspective.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 윤인진, "한국적 다문화주의의 전개와 특성: 국가와 시민사회의 관계를 중심으로" 한국사회학회 42 (42): 72-103, 2008

      2 권승, "한국사회에서 전개되는 다문화주의의 실체분석에 관한 연구 : Harold Troper의 다문화주의 정의에 기반하여" 21세기정치학회 20 (20): 55-75, 2010

      3 박진경, "한국 중앙정부 공무원의 다문화정책 정향성 영향요인" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2010

      4 김용신, "한국 사회의 다문화교육 지향과 실행 전략" 한국사회과교육연구학회 48 (48): 13-25, 2009

      5 차윤경, "한국 다문화교육의 전망과 과제" 2008

      6 황규호, "한국 다문화교육 내용선정의 쟁점과 과제" 한국교육과정학회 26 (26): 57-85, 2008

      7 통계청, "인구동태(혼인)"

      8 차윤경, "이민자 및 국민의 다문화사회통합을 위한 학교교육의 과제" 한국다문화사회와 학교교육의 역할, 서울교육대학교 2008

      9 신철균, "연구학교 제도의 특성 분석: 연구학교 주제 변화를 중심으로" 한국교육행정학회 28 (28): 281-305, 2010

      10 한수경, "세계화(지구화)이론의 모순" 8 : 121-160, 2011

      1 윤인진, "한국적 다문화주의의 전개와 특성: 국가와 시민사회의 관계를 중심으로" 한국사회학회 42 (42): 72-103, 2008

      2 권승, "한국사회에서 전개되는 다문화주의의 실체분석에 관한 연구 : Harold Troper의 다문화주의 정의에 기반하여" 21세기정치학회 20 (20): 55-75, 2010

      3 박진경, "한국 중앙정부 공무원의 다문화정책 정향성 영향요인" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2010

      4 김용신, "한국 사회의 다문화교육 지향과 실행 전략" 한국사회과교육연구학회 48 (48): 13-25, 2009

      5 차윤경, "한국 다문화교육의 전망과 과제" 2008

      6 황규호, "한국 다문화교육 내용선정의 쟁점과 과제" 한국교육과정학회 26 (26): 57-85, 2008

      7 통계청, "인구동태(혼인)"

      8 차윤경, "이민자 및 국민의 다문화사회통합을 위한 학교교육의 과제" 한국다문화사회와 학교교육의 역할, 서울교육대학교 2008

      9 신철균, "연구학교 제도의 특성 분석: 연구학교 주제 변화를 중심으로" 한국교육행정학회 28 (28): 281-305, 2010

      10 한수경, "세계화(지구화)이론의 모순" 8 : 121-160, 2011

      11 차윤경, "세계화 시대의 대안적 교육모델로서의 다문화 교육" 한국다문화교육학회 1 (1): 1-23, 2008

      12 이상헌, "세계통합이 국어 교과내용에 미치는 영향" 한양대학교 대학원 2006

      13 서승연, "세계통합과 한국 고등학교 사회교과 내용의 변화" 한국사회과교육연구학회 48 (48): 53-63, 2009

      14 부향숙, "세계사회의 문화내용과 한국 대학 교양교육과정의 관계 탐색 : 사회학적 제도주의 시각으로" 한양대학교 대학원 2009

      15 오재림, "다문화사회로의 이행: 평생교육의 새로운 정책패러다임" 평생교육진흥원·한국다문화교육학회 2009

      16 Banks, J. A., "다문화교육 입문" 아카데미프레스 2008

      17 오춘식, "국내 NGO의 세계시민권 의제의 변화에 관한 사례 연구: 흥사단과 참여연대를 중심으로" 한국사회과교육학회 44 (44): 153-184, 2012

      18 모경환, "결혼이주자를 위한 온라인 교육 프로그램 개발 연구" 한국사회과교육학회 44 (44): 29-63, 2012

      19 정경순, "개방형 고등교육체제의 제도화에 관한 비교연구" 한양대학교 대학원 2006

      20 강수돌, "[좌담회] 로컬리티, 글로컬리즘을 재사유하다" 한국민족문화연구소 (3) : 3-43, 2010

      21 Kamens, D. H., "Worldwide patterns in academic secondary education curricula" 40 (40): 116-138, 1996

      22 Meyer, J. W., "World society and the nation-state" 103 (103): 148-149, 1997

      23 Boli, J, "World culture and the institutional development of mass education, In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education" Greenwood Press 65-92, 1986

      24 Ramirez, F. O., "The worldwide rise of human rights education, In School knowledge in comparative and historical perspective: Changing curricula in primary and secondary education" Hong Kong University Press 35-52, 2006

      25 Meyer, J. W., "The world institutionalization of education, In Discourse formation in comparative education" Peter Lang 111-131, 2000

      26 Ramirez, F., "The valorization of humanity and diversity" 1 (1): 47-72, 2009

      27 Meyer, J. W., "The structure of education organization, In Environments and organization" Jossey-Bass 78-109, 1978

      28 Castells, M., "The rise of the network society" Blackwell 2000

      29 Schissler, H., "The nation, Europe, and the world: Textbooks and curricula in transition" Berghahn Books 2004

      30 Frank, D., "The nation state and the natural environment, 1990-1995" 65 : 96-116, 2000

      31 DiMaggio, P. J., "The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis" University of Chicago Press 1991

      32 Geertz, C., "The interpretation of cultures" Basic Books 1973

      33 Sutton, M., "The globalization of multicultural education" 12 (12): 97-108, 2005

      34 Moon, R., "Teaching world citizenship: The cross-national adoption of human rights in formal schooling" Stanford University 2009

      35 Banks, J. A., "Teaching for social justice, diversity, and citizenship in a global world" 68 : 289-298, 2004

      36 Drori, G. S., "Science in the modern world polity: Institutionalization and globalization" Stanford University Press 2003

      37 Meyer, J. W., "School knowledge for the masses: World models and national primary curricular categories in the twentieth century" Falmer Press 1992

      38 Benavot, A., "School Knowledge in Comparative and Historical Perspective: Changing Curricula in Primary and Secondary Education" Comparative Education Research Centre 2006

      39 Ham, S. -H., "Positioning education in the information society: The transnational diffusion of the information and communication technology curriculum" 53 (53): 535-557, 2009

      40 Meyer, J. W., "Ontology and rationalization in the Western cultural account, In Institutional structure: Constituting state, society, and the individual" Sage 12-40, 1987

      41 Baker, D. P., "National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling" Stanford University Press 2005

      42 Gray, K., "Migrant labor and civil society relation in South Korea" 15 (15): 381-390, 2006

      43 Schofer, E, "Methodological strategies and tools for the study of globalization, In Science in the modern world polity: Institutionalization and globalization" Stanford University Press 2003

      44 Robertson, R., "Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity, In Global modernities" Sage 25-44, 1995

      45 Ramirez, F. O., "Globalization, citizenship, and education: A cross-national study of curricula, 1955-2005"

      46 Tomlinson, J., "Globalization and culture" University of Chicago press 1999

      47 Cha, Y.-K., "Global civil society and the cross-national adoption of multicultural education policies" 2010

      48 Fiala, R., "Educational ideology and the school curriculum, In School knowledge in comparative and historical perspective" Hong Kong University Press 15-34, 2006

      49 Suarez, D., "Education professionals and the construction of human rights education" 51 (51): 48-70, 2007

      50 Weick, K. E., "Education organizations as loosely coupled system" 21 (21): 11-19, 1976

      51 Durkheim, E., "Education and sociology" Free Press 1924

      52 Cha, Y. -K., "Educating supranational citizens: The incorporation of English language education into curriculum policies" 117 (117): 183-209, 2011

      53 Soysal, Y. N., "Educating future citizens in Europe and Asia, In School knowledge in comparative and historical perspective" Hong Kong University Press 73-88, 2006

      54 Banks, J. A., "Educating citizens in a multicultural society" Teachers College Press 2007

      55 Bromley, P., "Cosmopolitan in civic education: Exploring cross-national trends, 1970-2008" 12 (12): 33-44, 2009

      56 Boli, J., "Constructing world culture: International nongovernmental organizations since 1875" Stanford University Press 1999

      57 Ramirez, F. O., "Building the institution of mass schooling: Isomorphism in the modern world, In The political construction of education" Praeger 47-60, 1992

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-06-28 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Association of Social Education KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.5 1.5 1.5
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.4 1.35 1.812 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼