RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      임화 문학의 현재성 ; 리얼리즘의 승리와 텍스트의 무의식 -임화의 「의도와 작품의 낙차와 비평」에 관한 몇 개의 주석- = Special Studies on The Actuality of Im Hwa`s Literature : The Triumph of Realism and the Unconscious of Text-on Im Hwa`s Literary Criticism in 1930`s

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75637036

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This article treats the literary criticism of Im Hwa after mid 1930s. It is well-known that the reconstruction of the subject was one of the most important themes of his literary criticism. He established a base of criticism by combining two matters, subject and realism, which was behind continuous speculations about the triumph of realism of 0Balzac suggested by F. Engels. One of his important critical reviews, `The Great Romantic Spirit`, insisted revolutionary romanticism and expressed his intense expectation of triumph of realism. Also, `The Recognition of Realism` and `The Reconstruction of the Subject and the World of Literature` offered a realism which could lead a writer to the right world view, which was called the reconstruction of the subject by realism by Im Hwa himself. What counts is that he insisted the reconstruction of the subject based on the triumph of realism. In the meantime, The Gap of Intention and Work and the Criticism` in 1938 suggested a deconstructive way of reading about the triumph of realism. This writing also offered sacred surplus: As the border between text and criticism was destroyed, the unconscious of the text appeared. This scene can be called one of the monuments of the history of Korean modern literary criticism.
      번역하기

      This article treats the literary criticism of Im Hwa after mid 1930s. It is well-known that the reconstruction of the subject was one of the most important themes of his literary criticism. He established a base of criticism by combining two matters, ...

      This article treats the literary criticism of Im Hwa after mid 1930s. It is well-known that the reconstruction of the subject was one of the most important themes of his literary criticism. He established a base of criticism by combining two matters, subject and realism, which was behind continuous speculations about the triumph of realism of 0Balzac suggested by F. Engels. One of his important critical reviews, `The Great Romantic Spirit`, insisted revolutionary romanticism and expressed his intense expectation of triumph of realism. Also, `The Recognition of Realism` and `The Reconstruction of the Subject and the World of Literature` offered a realism which could lead a writer to the right world view, which was called the reconstruction of the subject by realism by Im Hwa himself. What counts is that he insisted the reconstruction of the subject based on the triumph of realism. In the meantime, The Gap of Intention and Work and the Criticism` in 1938 suggested a deconstructive way of reading about the triumph of realism. This writing also offered sacred surplus: As the border between text and criticism was destroyed, the unconscious of the text appeared. This scene can be called one of the monuments of the history of Korean modern literary criticism.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 () KCI등재후보
      2000-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.91 0.9
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.86 0.87 1.721 0.34
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼