RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      창작론적 비평 방법의 연구 - 성격화를 중심으로 - = A Study on the Critical Method from Creative Writing Theories - Focused on Characterization -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76478561

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper aims at providing a frame for evaluating characterization from the standard of creative writing theories, and at analysing works by the frame.
      Reading works by a criticism based on creative writing theory is an act of reading including both synthetic reading as a reader and analytic reading as a writer. The synthetical evaluating standard is ‘Unity.’ And the analytic evaluating standards are ‘Preciseness’, ‘Congruity’ and ‘Affinity’.
      In terms of unity, ‘Is the character precisely characterized?’ and ‘Is the meaningful development achieved through the character?’ must be investigated. The analytic evaluating elements of the former question can be ‘Is the character revealed through specific details?’ and ‘Is his inner value revealed through the character’s outward attitudes?’(Preciseness), ‘Is the plot developed with the logical steps for achieving the character’s desire?’ and ‘Is the character differentiated through dialogs?’(Congruity), ‘Is the character having the humanistic strong point?’ and ‘Are the character’s feelings fully displayed?’(Affinity). The analytic evaluating elements of the latter can be ‘Are the character’s actions having obvious motivations?’ and ‘Are the characters’ influential relations clear?’(Preciseness), ‘Are the backgrounds offering the information about the character’s motives and actions?’(Congruity), ‘Are the character’s changes natural?’ and ‘Are there any stereotyped characters?’, ‘Are the characters sympathetic?’(Affinity).
      As a result of reading <Sleeping With Books> and <Books of Butchery> written by Lee Seungwoo with those standards, the characters of <Sleeping With Books> are proved as those whom readers can understand well, with affinitive personification and sympathetic characterization. But those of <Books of Butchery> are difficult to understand with not affinitive personification and unsympathetic characterization.
      This study can be useful to creative writing theory lessons. For learning-writers it can give a standard for evaluating and revising his own writing. Futhermore this study can be a step to a new criticism based on creative writing theories.
      번역하기

      This paper aims at providing a frame for evaluating characterization from the standard of creative writing theories, and at analysing works by the frame. Reading works by a criticism based on creative writing theory is an act of reading including bo...

      This paper aims at providing a frame for evaluating characterization from the standard of creative writing theories, and at analysing works by the frame.
      Reading works by a criticism based on creative writing theory is an act of reading including both synthetic reading as a reader and analytic reading as a writer. The synthetical evaluating standard is ‘Unity.’ And the analytic evaluating standards are ‘Preciseness’, ‘Congruity’ and ‘Affinity’.
      In terms of unity, ‘Is the character precisely characterized?’ and ‘Is the meaningful development achieved through the character?’ must be investigated. The analytic evaluating elements of the former question can be ‘Is the character revealed through specific details?’ and ‘Is his inner value revealed through the character’s outward attitudes?’(Preciseness), ‘Is the plot developed with the logical steps for achieving the character’s desire?’ and ‘Is the character differentiated through dialogs?’(Congruity), ‘Is the character having the humanistic strong point?’ and ‘Are the character’s feelings fully displayed?’(Affinity). The analytic evaluating elements of the latter can be ‘Are the character’s actions having obvious motivations?’ and ‘Are the characters’ influential relations clear?’(Preciseness), ‘Are the backgrounds offering the information about the character’s motives and actions?’(Congruity), ‘Are the character’s changes natural?’ and ‘Are there any stereotyped characters?’, ‘Are the characters sympathetic?’(Affinity).
      As a result of reading <Sleeping With Books> and <Books of Butchery> written by Lee Seungwoo with those standards, the characters of <Sleeping With Books> are proved as those whom readers can understand well, with affinitive personification and sympathetic characterization. But those of <Books of Butchery> are difficult to understand with not affinitive personification and unsympathetic characterization.
      This study can be useful to creative writing theory lessons. For learning-writers it can give a standard for evaluating and revising his own writing. Futhermore this study can be a step to a new criticism based on creative writing theories.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 들어가며
      • Ⅱ. 통합적 준거와 분석적 준거
      • Ⅲ. 이승우 소설의 성격화 분석 -「책과 함께 자다」와 「도살장의 책」을 중심으로 -
      • Ⅳ. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • Ⅰ. 들어가며
      • Ⅱ. 통합적 준거와 분석적 준거
      • Ⅲ. 이승우 소설의 성격화 분석 -「책과 함께 자다」와 「도살장의 책」을 중심으로 -
      • Ⅳ. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      • 저자소개
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "유혹하는 글쓰기" 김영사 2002

      2 "소설창작, 나와 세계가 만나는 길" 한국문화사 2000

      3 "소설창작 12강" 예림기획 2001

      4 "소설의 이해" 문예출판사 2000

      5 "소설의 분석" 현암사 1985

      6 "소설의 기술" 책세상 1997

      7 "소설쓰기의 이론과 실제" 한길사 1994

      8 "문학 이해의 구조" 예림기획 1999

      9 "당신도 소설을 쓸 수 있다" 문학사상사 1991

      10 "나는 아주 오래 살 것이다" 문이당 2002

      1 "유혹하는 글쓰기" 김영사 2002

      2 "소설창작, 나와 세계가 만나는 길" 한국문화사 2000

      3 "소설창작 12강" 예림기획 2001

      4 "소설의 이해" 문예출판사 2000

      5 "소설의 분석" 현암사 1985

      6 "소설의 기술" 책세상 1997

      7 "소설쓰기의 이론과 실제" 한길사 1994

      8 "문학 이해의 구조" 예림기획 1999

      9 "당신도 소설을 쓸 수 있다" 문학사상사 1991

      10 "나는 아주 오래 살 것이다" 문이당 2002

      11 "Writing the Breakout Novel, Sincinaty" Ohio: Writer's Digest Books, an imprint of F&W Publications, Inc. 2002

      12 "Getting into Character" New York: Wiley&Sons, Inc. 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.31 0.31 0.28
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.3 0.32 0.556 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼