The building sector is one of the major energy-consuming sectors, with its energy consumption share reaching up to 36% of the total final energy consumption worldwide. Among building energy end–uses, the energy used for air–conditioning in buildin...
The building sector is one of the major energy-consuming sectors, with its energy consumption share reaching up to 36% of the total final energy consumption worldwide. Among building energy end–uses, the energy used for air–conditioning in buildings accounts for a greater proportion of building energy consumption and has seen the most significant increase over the past decade. Research has been trying to tackle excessive energy consumption in buildings, mainly focusing on developing building energy efficiency measures such as the improvement of building thermal performance and energy efficiency of HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning) systems. Nonetheless, research has shown that besides building thermal performance and efficiency of its systems, factors related to its operation, particularly HVAC operation, have significant impacts on the energy consumed by a building. There is a need for more operation-centered approaches towards energy efficiency in buildings. Primarily, HVAC systems are run to provide thermal comfort to occupants, and conventionally, the systems are operated with a fixed setpoint temperature across an entire air- conditioning period (cooling/ heating season). However, research has revealed that people’s thermal comfort is influenced by their thermal expectations that are linked to recent experience with the thermal environment. It was indicated that occupants of a building have the ability to adapt and feel thermally comfortable with their indoor environment at a wider range of temperatures, depending on recent changes in outdoor thermal conditions. The research carried out in this dissertation aimed at developing a method for defining optimal HVAC setpoint temperature that minimizes the energy consumed for air- conditioning while keeping indoor temperature within the adequate temperature limits defined based on variations in outdoor thermal conditions. The study analyzed the integration of adaptive thermal comfort in HVAC operation control at two application levels: a basic application suitable for existing buildings with no smart control system, and an advanced application ideal for modern buildings equipped with energy management systems. The developed basic application of adaptive thermal comfort for setpoint temperature control applies adaptive thermal comfort to define a daily setpoint temperature. To assess its energy saving potential, an energy simulation model of a case study building was developed and calibrated. The method was then applied to adjust the setpoint temperature in the calibrated model, and the energy reduction was evaluated. In this study, the estimated energy reductions were validated by applying the developed method in an actual building. During the validation experiment, both the method’s energy savings and impacts on the thermal comfort of building occupants were evaluated. In the case of the developed advanced application of adaptive thermal comfort for setpoint temperature control, the methodology consisted of two steps. As a first step, an artificial neural network (ANN) model was built and trained to forecast indoor temperature and HVAC energy consumption for the next hour, given the setpoint temperature, and current outdoor and indoor environment conditions. In the second step, once the ANN model was developed and its prediction accuracy was optimized, the model was then used to select a setpoint temperature that minimized air-conditioning energy use and maintained indoor temperature within the defined range. In addition, for the advanced application, an ANN model was developed separately for each air-conditioning mode (cooling and heating), and energy saving potential was calculated based on the collected energy data for cooling and heating. Validation of the method’s applicability, energy efficiency, and impact on occupant thermal comfort was done through in-situ application in a case study building. The results from the basic application of adaptive thermal comfort for setpoint temperature control indicated that 9.0 and 8.6% of energy used for air-conditioning could be saved during cooling and heating, respectively. The actual application of the method in a case study building indicated that an actual energy reduction of 7.7% was achieved from cooling and 8.3% in heating, validating the estimated energy saving potential of the developed method. Regarding the developed advanced application of adaptive thermal comfort for setpoint temperature control, the main findings are summarized as follows: 1) although the developed ANN showed good prediction performance, hourly predictions were more accurate for indoor temperature in comparison with the energy consumption; 2) the estimated energy saving potential for cooling and heating was 7.1% and 12.8%, respectively; 3) the in-situ application of the method indicated cooling energy reductions between 8.4 and 12.4%. The highest energy reductions were achieved from days with higher outdoor temperatures. Method validation results from heating showed energy reductions of around 10.4% and 11.2%. Occupants’ responses from the survey conducted during the validation period for both the basic and advanced applications indicated that the developed method did not negatively impact the thermal comfort of occupants. In fact, collected responses during heating indicated that occupants were slightly more thermally satisfied on days when the setpoint temperature was controlled using the developed method. The overall energy efficiency of the developed method indicated that an annual energy reduction of 8.4% and 11.9% could be achieved through basic and advanced application of adaptive thermal comfort for setpoint temperature control.