RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    자연의 권리 = Nature`s Rights

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76379522

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Christopher D. Stone teaches law at University of Southern California in Los Angeles. The publication of Should Trees Have Standing? in 1972 was an important influence on the development of the field of environmental ethics. Stone is author of Earth and Other Ethics. Stone proposes giving legal rights to natural objects. While such an extension of rights may seem unthinkable, he points out that such extensions have always seemed unthinkable before they occurred, and that there are currently a number of inanimate legal persons, such as railroads and corporations. Stone summarizes what it means for something to have legal standing and how natural objects currently do not possess legal standing. He proposes an extension of the legal guardianship model for legal incompetents, and explains some of the advantages of such a strategy. Can an animal or a plant raise a lawsuit to a court? Environmental law is the regulation that was established in order to protect the public interest, that is the profit of mankind, the Earth, an ecosystem, etc. However, the current lawsuit system is the system that was prepared in order to protect personal profit. Therefore, I think that an existing lawsuit system cannot contribute to the realization for the purpose that environmental law aims at. So I insist that an existing lawsuit system should be revised in order to realize the purpose of an environmental law effectively. This paper is composed as follows. 1. Introduction 2. Historical Development of the Theory of Nature`s Rights 3. Case Study on Nature`s Right Litigation in Several States 4. The Possibility of Nature`s Right Litigation 5. Conclusion
    번역하기

    Christopher D. Stone teaches law at University of Southern California in Los Angeles. The publication of Should Trees Have Standing? in 1972 was an important influence on the development of the field of environmental ethics. Stone is author of Earth a...

    Christopher D. Stone teaches law at University of Southern California in Los Angeles. The publication of Should Trees Have Standing? in 1972 was an important influence on the development of the field of environmental ethics. Stone is author of Earth and Other Ethics. Stone proposes giving legal rights to natural objects. While such an extension of rights may seem unthinkable, he points out that such extensions have always seemed unthinkable before they occurred, and that there are currently a number of inanimate legal persons, such as railroads and corporations. Stone summarizes what it means for something to have legal standing and how natural objects currently do not possess legal standing. He proposes an extension of the legal guardianship model for legal incompetents, and explains some of the advantages of such a strategy. Can an animal or a plant raise a lawsuit to a court? Environmental law is the regulation that was established in order to protect the public interest, that is the profit of mankind, the Earth, an ecosystem, etc. However, the current lawsuit system is the system that was prepared in order to protect personal profit. Therefore, I think that an existing lawsuit system cannot contribute to the realization for the purpose that environmental law aims at. So I insist that an existing lawsuit system should be revised in order to realize the purpose of an environmental law effectively. This paper is composed as follows. 1. Introduction 2. Historical Development of the Theory of Nature`s Rights 3. Case Study on Nature`s Right Litigation in Several States 4. The Possibility of Nature`s Right Litigation 5. Conclusion

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이상돈, "환경정책기본법" 아세아문화사 1985

    2 홍성방, "환경보호의 법적 문제" 서강대학교 출판부 1999

    3 강재규, "자연을 위한 환경법인가"

    4 강재규, "자연보호소송"

    5 강재규, "자연과 인간의 공생을 위한 환경사상" 지산 2001

    6 강재규, "생태주의 환경법" 세종출판사 2002

    7 허범, "법정에 선 나무들" 아르케 2003

    8 강재규, "미국환경법과 법원" 세종출판사 1998

    9 천병태, "미국행정법" 부산대학교출판부 1992

    10 알도 레오폴드, "모래땅의 사계" 도서출판 푸른 숲 1999

    1 이상돈, "환경정책기본법" 아세아문화사 1985

    2 홍성방, "환경보호의 법적 문제" 서강대학교 출판부 1999

    3 강재규, "자연을 위한 환경법인가"

    4 강재규, "자연보호소송"

    5 강재규, "자연과 인간의 공생을 위한 환경사상" 지산 2001

    6 강재규, "생태주의 환경법" 세종출판사 2002

    7 허범, "법정에 선 나무들" 아르케 2003

    8 강재규, "미국환경법과 법원" 세종출판사 1998

    9 천병태, "미국행정법" 부산대학교출판부 1992

    10 알도 레오폴드, "모래땅의 사계" 도서출판 푸른 숲 1999

    11 森島明譯, "野生のうたが聞こえる" 森林書房

    12 志村富壽, "運命の風景-日光があぶない" 日本經濟評論社 1983

    13 鬼頭秀一, "自然保護を問いなおす" ちくま新書 1996

    14 ?山武道, "自然保護の訴訟"

    15 ?山武道, "環境行政判例の總合的硏究"

    16 芝池義一, "環境法의 性格" 한국지방자치연구소 1 (1): 1991

    17 山村恒年, "環境法入門" 昭和堂 44-, 1999

    18 山村恒年, "環境保護の法と政策" 信山社 1996

    19 關根孝道, "日米“種の保存法”の比較法的考察"

    20 山田隆夫, "奄美自然の權利訴訟の提起するもの" 49 (49): 1998

    21 阿部泰隆, "國土開發と環境保全" 日本評論社 1989

    22 山村恒年, "公害ㆍ環境判例百選" 有斐閣 1994

    23 硏究會, "公害ㆍ環境判例の軌跡と展望"

    24 北村喜宣, "公害ㆍ環境の行政判例-戰後の步みと展望"

    25 芝池義一, "公共事業と行政訴訟 - 處分性と原告適格"

    26 岡島成行, "アメリカの自然保護運動"

    27 籠橋隆明, "“自然の權利” 訴訟と市民の權利"

    28 Cass R. Sunstein, "What’s Standing After Lujan? of Citizen Suits, “Injuries,” and Article Ⅲ, 91 Mich. L. Rev."

    29 R. F. Nash, "The Rights of Nature : A History of Environmental Ethics"

    30 Roderick F. Nash, "The Rights of Nature" The University of Wisconsin Press 1989

    31 Carolyn Merchant, "Radical Ecology : The Search for a Livable World" 이후 2001

    32 John Passmore, "Man’s Responsibility for Nature"

    33 John Passmore, "Man’s Responsibility for Nature"

    34 Harold J. Krent, "Ethan G. Shenkman, Of Citizen Suits Sunstein, 91 Michi. L. Rev. 1773, 1793-1823"

    35 J. R. DesJardins, "Environmental Ethics : An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy" 자작나무 1999

    36 . S. Shrader-Frechette, "Environmental Ethics" The Boxwood Press 1991

    37 Zygmunt J. B. Plater, "Enviromental Law and Policy : a Coursebook on Nature, Law, and Society"

    38 홍준형, "'자연의 권리’ 소송은 가능한가?"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.14 1.14 1.15
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.04 0.97 1.226 0.39
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼