한국과 미국의 부동산민사신탁에 관한 연구 = Comparative Research of Civil Trust Laws on Real Estate in Korea and U.S.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

1. CONTENTS
(1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study is to compare the real estate Trust laws of U.S. particularly civil trust law of with those of Korea.
(2) RESEARCH METHOD
This study is conducted by field investigation and confirmation of practical contents after access to relevant webpages, as well as domestic and foreign literature review.
(3) RESEARCH FINDINGS
Recent years has witnessed an increase in the number of cases in which civil trust from English and American law is used as part of an inheritance measure, old age preparation, and activation of donations. The international environment around trust has also been changing fast with Japan revising its Trust Act by introducing civil trust. Any changes to Trust Act go beyond the act itself and require the revision of many concerned acts in civil law including inheritance, will, real estate registration law, inheritance and gift tax law, income tax law, and corporate tax law. As seen in the development history of trust, the primary object of trust remains to be real estate, which explains why real estate and trust are in an inseparable connection. In that sense, this study reviewed American real estate civil trust and found its implications.
2. RESULTS
The results of this study may present an opportunity not only to simply compare civil trust law on real estate but to consider what to improve in civil trust law system, as follows:
First, there were many uses of civil trust for real estate in the United States.
Second, the current Trust Act does not recognize the majority of civil trust used in the U. S. A. However, the gap between them has been narrowed down a lot thanks to the revision.
Third, there is a need to review the introduction of trust combining private and public good like charitable remainder trust.
Finally, those changes to Trust Act and System seem to have expanded the legal scope of real estate utilization. Follow-up study is needed to assess and test them.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• ABSTRACT
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 미국법상 부동산 민사신탁제도
• Ⅲ. 우리나라의 부동산민사신탁
• Ⅳ. 요약 및 결론
• 參考文獻

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "한국보험신문"

2 이상신, "한국과 미국의 부동산법제에 관한 비교연구(2)" 한국부동산학회 (43) : 358-377, 2010

3 김종서, "주택재개발사업에 신탁방식의 적용가능성" 한국부동산학회 (43) : 285-305, 2010

4 이태로, "조세법강의, 신정7판" 박영사 2011

5 정창률, "연금 체제(Pension regime) 측면에서 본 한국 노후 소득보장 체계 -갈림길에 선 한국 연금 체계-" 한국사회복지학회 62 (62): 329-348, 2010

6 함대영, "신탁형 자산유동화에서의 진정양도 판단" 한국증권법학회 (44) : 2010

7 홍유석, "신탁법, 전정판" 법문사 1999

8 최동식, "신탁법" 법문사 2006

9 최수정, "상속수단으로서의 신탁" 한국민사법학회 (34) : 565-602, 2006

10 최영문, "부동산투자회사에 대한 과세제도 현황과 개선방안 연구" 한국부동산학회 (41) : 123-137, 2010

11 권호근, "부동산투자회사(REITs)제도의 이론적 접근과 전망" 한국부동산학회 (41) : 109-122, 2010

12 조재영, "부동산개발 금융에 관한 법적 고찰 - 프로젝트 파이낸스의 금융구조를 중심으로 -" 한국부동산학회 (40) : 106-119, 2010

13 이성근, "미분양APT를 활용한 자산유동화 연구" 한국부동산학회 (36) : 43-60, 2009

14 Robert L, "미국신탁법" 2011

15 이전오, "대학의 기부금 신탁제도 도입방안에 관한 연구" 2007

16 이상신, "계획기부 활성화를 위한 법제 개선방안" 아름다운재단 2010

17 能見善久, "現代信託法" 有斐閣 2004

18 川口幸彦, "信託法改正と相續稅․ 贈與稅の諸問題" (57) : 2008

19 新井誠, "信託法, 3版" 有斐閣 2008

20 "woman21"

21 "tohoku"

22 "stanford"

23 "sbcvote"

24 Barry Kaye, "save a fortune on your Estate taxes" Forman publishing inc 1990

25 "naver"

26 "naver"

27 "koreadaily"

28 "koreadaily"

29 "http://www2s.biglobe.ne.jp/~yshr-mat/newpage22.htm"

30 "http://www2s.biglobe.ne.jp/~yshr-mat/newpage22.htm"

31 "hankyung"

32 "charitabletrust"

33 "charitabletrust"

34 Charles J, "Wealth without Risk" simon&schuster 1991

35 Debra Ashton, "The Complete Guide to Planned Giving: Everything You Need to Know to Compete Successfully for Major Gifts, 3rd ed"

36 "EzineArticles"

37 Richard D.Barrett, "CFRE, Planned Giving Essentials, 2nd ed" Aspen Publishers 2002

38 Miller․Jentz, "Business Law today, 5th" WEST 2000