A Study on Environmental Conflict Resolution Strategy of Jeju

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study categorizes conflict scenarios using frame analysis to resolve Jeju Island’s environmental conflicts and to advise a path for growth for the Jeju Environmental Dispute Resolution Committee (EDRC), an institutional framework. Environmental conflict establishes a frame for the conflicting parties and forms an antagonistic position with other frames while firmly keeping the frame. Dispute management must be implemented and approached systematically to be effective, as the environment is a complex topic that requires consideration of both conservation and development. It is essential to establish a public arena in which parties involved in disputes can speak with one another and share their perspectives on a situation. Civil conflicts (between private sectors), public-private conflicts, and conflicts between public institutions are the most common types of environmental problems in Jeju. Appropriate means and measures for each conflict situation are required for the rational resolution of environmental disputes, and the Jeju EDRC, which is currently in place, needs to supplement its ability to manage each conflict situation, so suggestions for the future of this study are critical.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 JejuSori, "수많은 갈등 속에 놓인 제주, 어떻게 해결해야 할까?"

2 Jeju News, "민주화로 깨어난 지방자치... 풀뿌리 민주주의 활짝"

3 김창수, "관료제와 민주주의의 딜레마: 천성산 원효터널 분쟁의 프레임 분석" 한국지방정부학회 12 (12): 61-86, 2008

4 Halla Ilbo, "강정부터 성산까지 ‘제주갈등’어쩌나"

5 Vaughan, E., "Variability in the framing of risk issues" 48 (48): 119-135, 1992

6 Driessen, P. P., "Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance –experiences from the Netherlands" 22 (22): 143-160, 2012

7 Amy, D. J., "The politics of environmental mediation" 11 : 1-, 1983

8 Elliott, M. L. P., "The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement" 199-240, 1999

9 Gray, B., "Strong opposition: frame‐based resistance to collaboration" 14 (14): 166-176, 2004

10 Desrosiers, M. E., "Reframing frame analysis : Key contributions to conflict studies" 11 (11): 1-23, 2012

11 Brès, L., "Pluralism in organizations : Learning from unconventional forms of organizations" 20 (20): 364-386, 2018

12 Rawls, J., "Outline of a decision procedure for ethics" 60 (60): 177-197, 1951

13 Habermas, J., "On social identity" 1974 (1974): 91-103, 1974

14 Jameson, F., "On Goffman's frame analysis" 3 (3): 119-133, 1976

15 Habermas, J., "New social movements" 1981 (1981): 1981

16 Habermas, J., "Modernity versus postmodernity" (22) : 3-14, 1981

17 Lewicki, R., "Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases" Island press 2003

18 Curran, D., "Indigenous processes of consent : Repoliticizing water governance through legal pluralism" 11 (11): 571-, 2019

19 Klintman, M., "Framings of science and ideology : Organic food labelling in the US and Sweden" 13 (13): 612-634, 2004

20 Benford, R. D., "Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment" 611-639, 2000

21 Kaufman, S., "Framing and reframing in land use change conflicts" 164-180, 1999

22 Kaufman, S., "Frames, framing and reframing" 1 : 1-8, 2003

23 Rein, M., "Frame-reflective policy discourse" 9 : 262-, 1991

24 Rein, M., "Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice" 9 (9): 85-104, 1996

25 Gray, B., "Frame reflection"

26 Benford, R. D., "Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement" 71 (71): 677-701, 1993

27 Shmueli, D., "Frame changes and the management of intractable conflicts" 24 (24): 207-218, 2006

28 Goffman, E., "Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience" Harvard University Press 1974

29 "EPA"

30 Pinkley, R. L, "Dimensions of conflict frame:Relation to disputant perceptions and expectations" 1992

31 Pinkley, R. L., "Dimensions of conflict frame : Disputant interpretations of conflict" 75 (75): 117-, 1990

32 Baur, V. E., "Dealing with distrust and power dynamics : Asymmetric relations among stakeholders in responsive evaluation" 16 (16): 233-248, 2010

33 Dewulf, A., "Contrasting frames in policy deba tes on climate change adaptation. Wiley Inte rdisciplinary Reviews" 4 (4): 321-330, 2013

34 Binford, L. R., "Constructing frames of reference: an analytical method for archaeological theory building using ethnographic and environmental data sets" University of California Press 2019

35 Rydin, Y., "Conflict, consensus, and rationality in environmental planning: an institutional discourse approach" OUP Oxford 2003

36 Achinstein, B., "Conflict amid community : The micropolitics of teacher collaboration" 104 (104): 421-455, 2002

37 Gamson, W. A., "Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings" 275-, 1996

38 Goffman, E., "A reply to Denzin and Keller"