관리지역 세분화와 토지 특성 간의 관계 연구 : 경주시 사례

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Environmental and conservation awareness has increased every year, Accordingly, land use and management of the establishment of a new concept was needed. 2003 fourth(4th) Comprehensive National Development Plan in the Pre-Design & Later-Development System for the Establishment of development thoughtless for the environment Comprehensive Measures for Prevention appeared Act on Planning and Use of National Territory of the establishment, Planned development of rural areas in order to induce the previous Semi-urban area, Semi-agricultural area due to a more scientific method Land Suitability Assessment carried out by Development purpose, agriculture purpose, Conservation purpose was divided into.

On this study, Gyeongju In the case of the Segmentation of Administration Zoness Development purpose, Agriculture purpose, Conservation purpose The topographic characteristics, land use characteristics and geographic characteristics in terms of Land Suitability Assessmentand to analyze what is the relationship has some characteristics pyogodeung Segmentation of Administration Zones should examine the adequacy of.

First, the elevation of the geographical characteristics Development purpose the Agriculture purpose and Conservation purpose Conservation purpose appears low relative to. Therefore, facilitate the development can be said.

Second, in terms of land use characteristics readjustment of arable land Ratio and Area ratio for the production of the pointing, pointing an area of the city have applied to analyze the ratio was, Agriculture purpose the readjustment of arable land Ratio showed the lowest, Conservation purpose, Development purpose appeared higher order, Segmentation of Administration Zones in the readjustment of arable land Ratio characteristics can be seen not been reflected.

Third, in terms of geographical characteristics Previously developed land in the distance, Public Convenience Facilities were analyzed with the appr, Development purpose Previously developed land in the distance is the shortest out due to the spread of Previously developed land that can be achieved cost savings, also, Public Convenience Facilities in with the accessibility analysis Development purpose most of the accessible and well tended to appear.

Analyzed for this attribute Development purpose, 200m above elevation, Agriculture Suitabilt and Conservation purpose than the elevation of the land, about 100m Segmentation of Administration Zones he looked at the adequacy of, Development purpose in the elevation 200m higher than the land coming from the Slope, Previously developed land in the distance, Public Convenience Facilities proximity with the lower, Development Suitabilt it from being designated as the feasibility of the problem, Elevation 200m above the ground in Agriculture purpose readjustment of arable land Ratio low, the problem is it from being designated as Agriculture Suitabilt, And less than 100m above sea level Conservation purpose that the slope is low, Previously developed land in the distance or Public Convenience Facilities proximity with the Conservation purpose appears to specify rather good hagieneun This lack of validity to be the next challenge is complementary.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제Ⅰ장 서 론 1
• 제1절. 연구의 배경과 목적 1
• 제2절. 연구의 범위 및 방법 2
• 제Ⅱ장 관리지역 세분화의 제도적 고찰 3
• 제1절. 관리지역 세분화와 토지적성평가 제도 3
• 1. 관리지역 세분의 의의 3
• 1) 관리지역 세분화 개념 3
• 2) 관리지역 세분화 방법 4
• 제2절. 관리지역의 토지이용규제 6
• 1) 관리지역의 용적률 6
• 2) 관리지역의 건폐율 6
• 3) 관리지역의 건축물 허용용도 7
• 제3절. 토지적성평가 제도 7
• 1) 토지적성평가 개념 7
• 2) 토지적성평가 방법 9
• 3) 토지적성평가 절차 10
• 4) 토지적성평가 지표와 조사방법 12
• 5) 토지적성평가 등급부여 및 활용 13
• 제Ⅲ장 관리지역 세분화와 토지 특성간의 관계 연구(경주시 사례) 17
• 제1절. 경주시 개발여건 17
• 1. 경주시 장래 비젼 17
• 2. 경주시의 도시성장 18
• 1) 인구 및 고용의 성장 18
• 2) 토지이용의 변화(지목) 19
• 제2절. 경주시 관리지역 세분화 21
• 1. 경주시 관리지역 세분화 일정 21
• 1) 2007년 이전 추진 현황 21
• 2) 2008년도 추진 현황 23
• 2. 경주시 관리지역 세분화 기준 24
• 3. 경주시 관리지역 세분화 결과 25
• 제3절. 경주시 관리지역의 토지특성 분석 28
• 1. 지형적 특성 28
• 1) 표고 28
• 2) 경사도 29
• 2. 토지이용 특성 30
• 1) 경지정리 비율 30
• 2) 생산용도의 지목면적 비율 32
• 3) 도시적 용도의 지목면적 비율 32
• 3. 지리적 특성 33
• 1) 기개발지와의 거리 33
• 2) 공공편익시설의 접근성 34
• 제4절. 관리지역세분화의 적정성 평가 35
• 1. 표고 200m이상 계획관리지역 36
• 1) 경사도 분석 36
• 2) 기개발지와 거리 분석 37
• 3) 공공편익시설과의 접근성 분석 37
• 2. 표고 200m이상 생산관리지역 38
• 1) 경사도 분석 38
• 2) 경지정리비율 분석 39
• 3. 표고 100m이하 보전관리지역 40
• 1) 경사도 분석 40
• 2) 기개발지와 거리 분석 41
• 3) 공공편익시설과의 접근성 분석 42
• 제Ⅳ장 결 론 44
• 참고문헌 46
• Abstract 48