토지공개념과 토지이용제한

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the 1970s, the state has been promoting the development of land by promoting the development of the land by promoting the development of land, Land use restrictions have been made on the basis of law.
Recently, the government has stipulated the basis for further strengthening the land public opinion in the Constitution in order to dissolve the polarization of income, to suppress land speculation, and to find a way to restrict land use in individual laws.
In this paper, we clarify the concept of land public opinion and clarify that it is not a concept that is limited to the polarization of income and the suppression of land speculation. It is a concept that covers the balanced development of national land and the establishment of the order of national land use. The land use restricting system such as the so-called development profit return method and the land use restricting system in the individual law in the land use limitation law, the land use planning law, and the real estate tax law.
From the 1972 Constitution to the current Constitution, the land public opinion has been stipulated, and since the legislator has relaxed or strengthened the concept of land ownership by considering the economic conditions of the state through individual laws, The public interest welfare of the land, the public need for the land, the
development, utilization and conservation of the land, the principle of the livelihood of the agricultural land, the distribution of the income appropriately, the democratization of the land, And the maturity of the public nature of the land use restriction system.
Even if the land public opinion is strengthened through the amendment, it will be said that it does not infringe the essential matter of property guarantee, principle of equality, principle of excessive prohibition. In addition to the development fee, public contribution system, transfer income tax system, and excess return system for
reconstruction, there is a system to return the development profit within the development project area to the developers and residents of the development project.
The problem of infringement of the principle of equality will be absent. Therefore, the issue of reintroduction of excess tax on land or public land tax will be examined. The question of the question of the unconstitutionality of the land transaction clearance system, the question of whether the development right and the use right can be
separated from the land ownership, the ownership of land ownership, the separate development right and the right of use are the national and local governments And to find ways to regulate land use restrictions reasonably.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 白承柱, "현행 토지공개념제도의 시장 친화적 제도로의 변환가능성 고찰" 한국토지공법학회 38 : 643-676, 2007

2 김학성, "헌법학원론" 피앤씨미디어 2014

3 심경수, "헌법" 법문사 2018

4 이동훈, "한국헌법원론" 동방문화사 2012

5 이호용, "토지의 공공성과 재산권성의 갈등조정기제로서의 참가와 소통 ― 도시기반조성을 위한 토지의 이용과 관련하여 ―" 세계헌법학회한국학회 17 (17): 193-213, 2011

6 하능식, "토지분 재산세 과세대상 구분체계의 실태분석" 한국지방세연구원 2015

7 유해웅, "토지공법" 삼영사 2003

8 임정평, "토지공개념과 사유재산제와의 법적 갈등에 관한 연구" 20 : 1986

9 이선영, "토지개발허가제의 토지법적 의의 -「국토계획법」 제56조를 중심으로-" 한국부동산연구원 24 (24): 77-90, 2014

10 차진아, "사회국가의 실현구조와 토지공개념의 헌법상 의미" 한국비교공법학회 19 (19): 3-41, 2018

11 박현주, "국토의 계획적 이용관리 및 토지의 공공성 강화" 국토연구원 1999

12 최송화, "공익개념의 법문제화: 행정법적 문제로서의 공익" 서울대학교법학 연구소 40 (40): 2000

13 김남욱, "개발부담금제도에 관한 일고찰" 한국토지공법학회 10 : 2000

14 김남철, "831 부동산 종합대책에 대한 공법적 검토" 한국공법학회 34 (34): 177-201, 2006