RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      정신치료 수련의 질과 역량에 관한 정신건강의학과 전공의 인식도 조사 = A Recognition Survey by Psychiatry Residents Regarding the Quality of Psychotherapy Training and Psychotherapy Competencies in Korea

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives This study surveyed the quality of psychotherapy training and psychotherapy competencies during residency in Korea. Methods A questionnaire developed by The Committee of Residency Training of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association was completed by fourth-year residents of Korean psychiatry (n=120). The questionnaire examined their demographic characteristics, their experience of clinical psychotherapy training, their degree of satisfaction in the quality of psychotherapy training, and self-rated competence regarding the six types of psychotherapies, including supportive psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, group psychotherapy, and family psychotherapy. Results The degree of satisfaction of the residents with the psychotherapy training was diverse among the types of psychotherapy and contents of training. Across all types of psychotherapies, the satisfaction levels of the quantity and quality of supervision education were low, except for psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Overall, more than 70% of residents were not satisfied with the theoretical education, clinical practice, and supervision education in three types of psychotherapies, including interpersonal psychotherapy, group psychotherapy, and family psychotherapy. A positive correlation was found between the degree of satisfaction with the quality of training experience and self-rated competence of psychotherapy. Specifically, the self-rated competence of psychotherapy was more highly correlated with the experience of clinical cases and supervision than theoretical education Conclusion This study showed the quantitative and qualitative status of psychotherapy training in Korean psychiatry residency programs, and the satisfaction level of psychotherapy education was low except for psychoanalytic psychotherapy. There is a strong need for the improvement of psychotherapy training programs in Korea.
      번역하기

      Objectives This study surveyed the quality of psychotherapy training and psychotherapy competencies during residency in Korea. Methods A questionnaire developed by The Committee of Residency Training of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association was comp...

      Objectives This study surveyed the quality of psychotherapy training and psychotherapy competencies during residency in Korea. Methods A questionnaire developed by The Committee of Residency Training of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association was completed by fourth-year residents of Korean psychiatry (n=120). The questionnaire examined their demographic characteristics, their experience of clinical psychotherapy training, their degree of satisfaction in the quality of psychotherapy training, and self-rated competence regarding the six types of psychotherapies, including supportive psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, group psychotherapy, and family psychotherapy. Results The degree of satisfaction of the residents with the psychotherapy training was diverse among the types of psychotherapy and contents of training. Across all types of psychotherapies, the satisfaction levels of the quantity and quality of supervision education were low, except for psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Overall, more than 70% of residents were not satisfied with the theoretical education, clinical practice, and supervision education in three types of psychotherapies, including interpersonal psychotherapy, group psychotherapy, and family psychotherapy. A positive correlation was found between the degree of satisfaction with the quality of training experience and self-rated competence of psychotherapy. Specifically, the self-rated competence of psychotherapy was more highly correlated with the experience of clinical cases and supervision than theoretical education Conclusion This study showed the quantitative and qualitative status of psychotherapy training in Korean psychiatry residency programs, and the satisfaction level of psychotherapy education was low except for psychoanalytic psychotherapy. There is a strong need for the improvement of psychotherapy training programs in Korea.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 서 론 방 법 결 과 고 찰 결 론
      • 서 론 방 법 결 과 고 찰 결 론
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Sudak DM, "Trends in psychotherapy training : a national survey of psychiatry residency training" 36 : 369-373, 2012

      2 Foulkes P, "Trainee perceptions of teaching of different psychotherapies" 11 : 209-214, 2003

      3 Loganbill C, "Supervision : a conceptual model" 10 : 3-42, 1982

      4 Mohl PC, "Psychotherapy training for the psychiatrist of the future" 147 : 7-13, 1990

      5 Kovach JG, "Psychotherapy training : residents’perceptions and experiences" 39 : 567-574, 2015

      6 Calabrese C, "Psychiatric residents’ views of quality of psychotherapy training and psychotherapy competencies : a multisite survey" 34 : 13-20, 2010

      7 Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Partial revision of medical residency training curriculum notification" Ministry of Health and Welfare

      8 Leszcz M, "Part V: Canadian psychiatrists’use of psychotherapy" 28-31, 2002

      9 Sang Min Lee, "Intensive Psychotherapy Training in Korean Psychiatric Residency Programs" 대한신경정신의학회 5 (5): 221-227, 2008

      10 Grant S, "Guidelines for psychotherapy training as part of general professional psychiatric training" 17 : 695-698, 1993

      1 Sudak DM, "Trends in psychotherapy training : a national survey of psychiatry residency training" 36 : 369-373, 2012

      2 Foulkes P, "Trainee perceptions of teaching of different psychotherapies" 11 : 209-214, 2003

      3 Loganbill C, "Supervision : a conceptual model" 10 : 3-42, 1982

      4 Mohl PC, "Psychotherapy training for the psychiatrist of the future" 147 : 7-13, 1990

      5 Kovach JG, "Psychotherapy training : residents’perceptions and experiences" 39 : 567-574, 2015

      6 Calabrese C, "Psychiatric residents’ views of quality of psychotherapy training and psychotherapy competencies : a multisite survey" 34 : 13-20, 2010

      7 Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Partial revision of medical residency training curriculum notification" Ministry of Health and Welfare

      8 Leszcz M, "Part V: Canadian psychiatrists’use of psychotherapy" 28-31, 2002

      9 Sang Min Lee, "Intensive Psychotherapy Training in Korean Psychiatric Residency Programs" 대한신경정신의학회 5 (5): 221-227, 2008

      10 Grant S, "Guidelines for psychotherapy training as part of general professional psychiatric training" 17 : 695-698, 1993

      11 Milne DL, "Effectiveness of cognitive therapy training" 30 : 81-92, 1999

      12 Yager J, "Assessing psychotherapy competence in psychiatric residents : getting real" 11 : 109-112, 2003

      13 Ravitz P, "Advances in psychotherapy education" 49 : 230-237, 2004

      14 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, "ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in psychiatry" Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education

      15 Hadjipavlou G, "A national survey of Canadian psychiatry residents’ perceptions of psychotherapy training" 52 : 710-717, 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼