집합물의 FRBR 구현 방안에 관한 연구 - RDA, KCR4 목록규칙 기술방안을 중심으로 - = A Study on the Bibliographic Description of RDA & KCR4 Cataloging Rules for FRBRizing the Aggregates

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is to suggest the bibliographic description of RDA & KCR4 cataloging rules for FRBRizing the aggregates based on aggregates modeling. It is to suggest bibliographic description of RDA & KCR4 cataloging rules of aggregates through analyzing FRBR and LRM aggregates modeling and comparing RDA and KCR4 cataloging rules about aggregates. First, it is to describe the bibliographic records based on object oriented model, and to describe both aggregates works and separate works appropriately. Second, in case of aggregates by one person, family, or corporate body, collective title as aggregates work and separate works in aggregates must be regulated in RDA. In KCR4, collective titles rules should be regulated for aggregate works and separate works should be described. Third, aggregates of works by different persons, families, or corporate bodies should be accessible by aggregates work and separate works, and aggregates of works by different persons, families, or corporate bodies without collective title should be accessible by each of the works in both RDA and KCR4. Fourth, augmentation aggregates could be accessible by main work’s expression, the expression of aggregates work, and separate expressions of the augmentation. This study will contribute to FRBRize the aggregates by suggesting bibliographic description of RDA & KCR4 cataloging rules.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본고는 집합물의 FRBR 구현을 위해 집합물 모델링을 바탕으로 RDA, KCR4 목록규칙 기술방안을 제안하고자 한다. FRBR과 LRM의 집합물 모델링을 분석하고, 이러한 집합물 모델링에 따라 RDA, KCR4의 집합물 관련 목록규칙을 비교하여, 집합물을 위한 RDA와 KCR4 목록규칙 기술방안을 제시하였다. 첫째, 객체지향모형으로 서지레코드를 기술하되, 가능한 집합저작과 수록된 개별저작을 모두 기술할 수 있도록 한다. 둘째, 한 개인이나 가족, 단체에 의한 집합물인 경우, RDA에서는 집합저작으로 전통적인 종합표제를 기술하는 것과 함께 개별저작을 기술하는 규칙을 마련해야 한다. KCR4에서는 집합저작과 개별저작을 기술하되 집합저작은 전통적인 종합표제를 사용하도록 규정해야 한다. 셋째, 여러 개인이나 가족, 단체의 집합물의 경우, RDA와 KCR4 모두 집합물의 표제가 있으면 집합저작과 개별저작을 같이 기술하고, 집합물의 표제가 없는 경우는 집합저작 보다는 개별저작을 기술하도록 한다. 넷째, 보유 집합물은 필요시 주된 저작의 표현형과 함께 집합저작, 보유 표현형으로 모두 접근할 수 있도록 규정해야 한다. 본 연구는 집합물을 위한 RDA, KCR4 목록규칙 기술방안을 제시하여 집합물의 FRBR 구현을 가능하도록 할 것이다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한국도서관협회, "한국목록규칙" 한국도서관협회 2003

2 Espley, J. L., "The VTLS Implementation of FRBR" 50 (50): 369-386, 2012

3 Bennett, R., "The Concept of a Work in Worldcat: An Application of FRBR" 27 (27): 45-59, 2003

4 JSC for Development of RDA, "RDA: Resource Description and Access. 2014 Revision" ALA 2014

5 Hart, A., "RDA Made Simple" Library Unlimited 2014

6 Library of Congress, "Module 4: Identifying Works and Expressions"

7 Žumer, M., "Modeling Aggregates in FRBR" 50 (50): 456-472, 2012

8 Riva, P., "IFLA Library Reference Model: A Conceptual Model for Bibliographic Information"

9 IFLA Study Group on the FRBR, "Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records:Final Report"

10 Working Group on Aggregates, "Final Report of the Working Group on Aggregates"

11 O’Neill, E., "FRBR: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Application of the Entity-relationship Model to Humphry Clinker" 46 (46): 150-159, 2002

12 O’Neill, E., "FRBR Aggregates: Their Types and Frequency in Library Collections" 59 (59): 120-129, 2015

13 Working Group on Aggregates, "Differences between the Works-of-works (Tillett) and the Manifestation-of-expressions (O’Neill-Žumer) Definitions of Aggregates"

14 Tillett, B., "Definition of Aggregates as Works Tillett Proposal"

15 Gatenby, J., "Collected Work Clustering in WorldCat" (30) : 2017

16 O’Neill, E., "Aggregates as Manifestations O’Neill and Žumer Proposal"

17 Thornburg, G., "A Candid Look at Collected Works: Challenges of Clustering Aggregates in GLIMIR and FRBR" 33 (33): 53-64, 2014