RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    이익 혹은 손실 상황에서 금융소비자들이 경험하는 감정은 모두 같은가? -조절초점에 따른 감정 유형 간 강도 그리고 만족도 차이를 중심으로- = Do All Financial Consumers Have the Same Emotional Responses and Satisfaction Level in Gain or Loss Domain? -Differences of Intensity of Emotional Type and Satisfaction in Terms of Regulatory Focus

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82687198

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigates whether financial consumers experience emotional responses and satisfaction intensity differently according to regulatory focus (promotion focus vs. prevention focus) and regulatory fit, even though the monetary induced emotional valence (gain vs. loss) is in the same direction. Two research streams exist on the relationship between emotions and decision-making. First, emotional valence influences decision-making. This perspective assumes that not only all negative emotions, but also all positive emotions play the same role in influencing decisionmaking. Second, even though emotions share the same valence, they may influence decisionmaking in different ways. However, these two research streams have existed in separate domains. In this article, I propose that regulatory focus, derived from self-discrepancy theory, as a kind of cognitive structure, plays an important role in different ways of activating emotional responses and therefore differential influence on decision-making. Consumers appraise emotion as an input information, and interpret it differently according to their decision making goal. According to self-regulatory orientation, promotion focus and prevention focus have different motivational inclinations, different implicit or explicit goals, and different goal-attaining behavior strategy. Regulatory focus activate distinct emotions and the impact of emotions on decisionmaking can transpire in line with regulatory fit. This hypothesis was examined under laboratory conditions with the following results. First, the impact of psychological states evoked by monetary valence (gain vs. loss) on emotional responses displayed the same directional effects. Emotional valence was positive in the domain of gain, whereas emotional valence was negative in the domain of loss. Regulatory focus, however, played a differential role in emotional responses. Promotion-focused participants generally responded positively in overall emotions, whereas prevention-focused participants generally responded negatively in overall emotions. This result was somewhat different than what would be expected according to prospect theory. Second, The influence of regulatory focus on emotional responses and satisfaction was disappeared when customer`s outcome performance posited ``gain-but-less than expectancy level`` (positive performance but expectancy-negative disconfirmation condition) or ``loss-but-less than expectancy level`` (negative performance but expectancy-positive disconfirmation condition). But even though under these conditions, valence displayed the same directional effects on emotional responses and satisfaction. Third, in the gain domain, cheerfulness-related emotional responses were more intense than those of quiescence-related emotional responses, but there was no statistical difference between promotion-focused participants and prevention-focused participants. In the loss domain, prevention-focused participants reported more intensity in emotion than promotion-focused participants, but there was no statistical difference between agitation-related emotional responses and dejection-related emotional responses. Based on these results, I conclude that the intensity of the pleasure of gain and the pain of loss is different in line with regulatory focus, especially regulatory fit. Furthermore, the magnitude of difference in emotional response between promotion-focused financial consumers and preventionfocused financial consumers is larger in the domain of loss than in the domain of gain. Customer care from the perspective of customer relationship management is very important in the domain of loss, but coping strategies are different in according to regulatory focus.
    번역하기

    This study investigates whether financial consumers experience emotional responses and satisfaction intensity differently according to regulatory focus (promotion focus vs. prevention focus) and regulatory fit, even though the monetary induced emotion...

    This study investigates whether financial consumers experience emotional responses and satisfaction intensity differently according to regulatory focus (promotion focus vs. prevention focus) and regulatory fit, even though the monetary induced emotional valence (gain vs. loss) is in the same direction. Two research streams exist on the relationship between emotions and decision-making. First, emotional valence influences decision-making. This perspective assumes that not only all negative emotions, but also all positive emotions play the same role in influencing decisionmaking. Second, even though emotions share the same valence, they may influence decisionmaking in different ways. However, these two research streams have existed in separate domains. In this article, I propose that regulatory focus, derived from self-discrepancy theory, as a kind of cognitive structure, plays an important role in different ways of activating emotional responses and therefore differential influence on decision-making. Consumers appraise emotion as an input information, and interpret it differently according to their decision making goal. According to self-regulatory orientation, promotion focus and prevention focus have different motivational inclinations, different implicit or explicit goals, and different goal-attaining behavior strategy. Regulatory focus activate distinct emotions and the impact of emotions on decisionmaking can transpire in line with regulatory fit. This hypothesis was examined under laboratory conditions with the following results. First, the impact of psychological states evoked by monetary valence (gain vs. loss) on emotional responses displayed the same directional effects. Emotional valence was positive in the domain of gain, whereas emotional valence was negative in the domain of loss. Regulatory focus, however, played a differential role in emotional responses. Promotion-focused participants generally responded positively in overall emotions, whereas prevention-focused participants generally responded negatively in overall emotions. This result was somewhat different than what would be expected according to prospect theory. Second, The influence of regulatory focus on emotional responses and satisfaction was disappeared when customer`s outcome performance posited ``gain-but-less than expectancy level`` (positive performance but expectancy-negative disconfirmation condition) or ``loss-but-less than expectancy level`` (negative performance but expectancy-positive disconfirmation condition). But even though under these conditions, valence displayed the same directional effects on emotional responses and satisfaction. Third, in the gain domain, cheerfulness-related emotional responses were more intense than those of quiescence-related emotional responses, but there was no statistical difference between promotion-focused participants and prevention-focused participants. In the loss domain, prevention-focused participants reported more intensity in emotion than promotion-focused participants, but there was no statistical difference between agitation-related emotional responses and dejection-related emotional responses. Based on these results, I conclude that the intensity of the pleasure of gain and the pain of loss is different in line with regulatory focus, especially regulatory fit. Furthermore, the magnitude of difference in emotional response between promotion-focused financial consumers and preventionfocused financial consumers is larger in the domain of loss than in the domain of gain. Customer care from the perspective of customer relationship management is very important in the domain of loss, but coping strategies are different in according to regulatory focus.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 최낙환, "속성정보가 유발하는 긍정적 감정이 제품평가에 미치는 영향에 대한 기분의 조절역할" 한국소비자학회 19 (19): 39-65, 2008

    2 박종원, "소비자의 기억, 정서, 판단에 관한 연구의 최신 동향" 한국소비자학회 21 (21): 237-287, 2010

    3 이유재, "고객만족 연구에 관한 종합적 고찰" 11 (11): 139-166, 2000

    4 서용원, "고객 만족/불만족 차원 검증에 관한 연구" 한국소비자·광고심리학회 4 (4): 103-121, 2003

    5 Kim, Hakkyun, "Will This Trip Really Be Exciting? The Role of Incidental Emotions in Product Evaluation" UNIV CHICAGO PRESS 36 (36): 983-991, 2010

    6 Fishburn, Peter C., "Two-Piece von Neumann-Morgenstern Utility Functions" 10 (10): 503-518, 1979

    7 Bagozzi, Richard P., "The Role of Emotions in Marketing" 27 (27): 184-206, 1999

    8 Bagozzi, Richard P., "The Role of Culture and Gender in the Relationship Between Positive and Negative Affect" 13 (13): 641-672, 1999

    9 Labroo, Aparna A., "The Orientation-Matching Hypothesis: An Emotion-Specificity Approach to Affect Regulation" 47 (47): 955-966, 2010

    10 Cohen, Joel B., "The Nature and Role of Affect in Consumer Behavior, In Handbook of Consumer Psychology" Psychology Press 297-348, 2008

    1 최낙환, "속성정보가 유발하는 긍정적 감정이 제품평가에 미치는 영향에 대한 기분의 조절역할" 한국소비자학회 19 (19): 39-65, 2008

    2 박종원, "소비자의 기억, 정서, 판단에 관한 연구의 최신 동향" 한국소비자학회 21 (21): 237-287, 2010

    3 이유재, "고객만족 연구에 관한 종합적 고찰" 11 (11): 139-166, 2000

    4 서용원, "고객 만족/불만족 차원 검증에 관한 연구" 한국소비자·광고심리학회 4 (4): 103-121, 2003

    5 Kim, Hakkyun, "Will This Trip Really Be Exciting? The Role of Incidental Emotions in Product Evaluation" UNIV CHICAGO PRESS 36 (36): 983-991, 2010

    6 Fishburn, Peter C., "Two-Piece von Neumann-Morgenstern Utility Functions" 10 (10): 503-518, 1979

    7 Bagozzi, Richard P., "The Role of Emotions in Marketing" 27 (27): 184-206, 1999

    8 Bagozzi, Richard P., "The Role of Culture and Gender in the Relationship Between Positive and Negative Affect" 13 (13): 641-672, 1999

    9 Labroo, Aparna A., "The Orientation-Matching Hypothesis: An Emotion-Specificity Approach to Affect Regulation" 47 (47): 955-966, 2010

    10 Cohen, Joel B., "The Nature and Role of Affect in Consumer Behavior, In Handbook of Consumer Psychology" Psychology Press 297-348, 2008

    11 Pham, Michel T., "The Logic of Feeling" 14 (14): 360-369, 2004

    12 Frijda, Nico H., "The Emotions" Cambridge University Press 1986

    13 Larsen, Jeff T., "The Agony of Victory and Thrill of Defeat" 15 (15): 325-330, 2004

    14 Cacioppo, John T., "The Affect System has Parallel and Integrative Processing Components: Form Follows Function" 76 (76): 839-855, 1999

    15 Brendl, C. Miguel, "Sensitivity to Varying Gains and Losses: The Role of Self-Discrepancies and Event Framing" 69 (69): 1028-1051, 1995

    16 Higgins, E. Tory, "Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect" 94 (94): 319-340, 1987

    17 Higgins, E. Tory, "Self-Discrepancy Theory: What Patterns of Self-Beliefs Cause People to Suffer?, In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 22" Academic Press 93-136, 1989

    18 Strauman, Timothy J., "Self-Discrepancies in Clinical Depression and Social Phobia: Cognitive Structures That Underlie Emotional Disorders" 98 (98): 14-22, 1989

    19 Strauman, Timothy J., "Self-Discrepancies as Predictors of Vulnerability to Distinct Syndromes of Chronic Emotional Distress" 56 (56): 685-707, 1989

    20 Higgins, E. Tory, "Self-Discrepancies and Emotional Vulnerability: How Magnitude, Accessibility, and Type of Discrepancy Influence Affect" 51 (51): 5-15, 1986

    21 Higgins, E. Tory, "Self-Concept Discrepancy Theory: A Psychological Model for Distinguishing Among Different Aspects of Depression and Anxiety" 3 (3): 51-76, 1985

    22 Oliver, Richard L., "Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgments" 14 (14): 495-507, 1988

    23 Crowe, Ellen, "Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision Making" 69 (69): 117-132, 1997

    24 Shah, James, "Regulatory Concerns and Appraisal Efficiency: The General Impact of Promotion and Prevention" 80 (80): 693-705, 2001

    25 Kahneman, Daniel, "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk" 47 (47): 263-291, 1979

    26 Higgins, E. Tory, "Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as a Motivational Principle, In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 30" Academic Press 1-46, 1998

    27 Higgins, E. Tory, "Promotion and Prevention Experiences: Relating Emotions to Nonemotional Motivational States, In Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition" Erlbaum 186-211, 2001

    28 Westbrook, Robert A., "Product/Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Postpurchase Processes" 24 (24): 258-270, 1987

    29 Smith, Craig A., "Patterns of Cognitive Appraisal in Emotion" 48 (48): 813-838, 1985

    30 Schwarz, Norbert, "Mood, Misattribution and Judgments of Well-Being: Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States" 45 (45): 513-523, 1983

    31 Forgas, Joseph P., "Mood and Judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM)" 117 (117): 39-66, 1995

    32 Higgins, E. Tory, "Making a Good Decision:Value from Fit" 55 (55): 1217-1230, 2000

    33 Tversky, Amos, "Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model" 106 (106): 1039-1061, 1991

    34 Johnson, Joseph, "Loser, Winners, and Biased Trader" 32 (32): 324-329, 2005

    35 Raghunathan, Rajagopal, "Informational Properties of Anxiety and Sadness, and Displaced Coping" 32 (32): 596-601, 2006

    36 Isen, Alice M., "Influence of Positive Affect on the Subjective Utility of Gains and Losses - It is Just Not Worth the Risk" 55 (55): 710-717, 1988

    37 Griskevicius, Vladas, "Influence of Different Positive Emotions on Persuasion Processing: A Functional Evolutionary Approach" 10 (10): 190-206, 2010

    38 Pham, Michel T., "Ideal and Oughts and the Reliance on Affective versus Substance in Persuasion" 30 (30): 503-518, 2004

    39 Bartlett, Monica Y., "Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior: Helping When It Costs You" 17 (17): 319-325, 2006

    40 Roney, Christopher J. R., "Goals and Framing: How Outcome Focus Influences Motivation and Emotion" 21 (21): 1151-1160, 1995

    41 Bosmans, Anick, "Goal-Relevant Emotional Information: When Extraneous Affect Leads to Persuasion and When It Does Not" 32 (32): 424-434, 2005

    42 Agrawal, Nidhi, "Getting Emotional About Health" 44 (44): 100-113, 2007

    43 Ellsworth, Phoebe C., "From Appraisal to Emotion: Differences Among Unpleasant Feelings" 12 (12): 271-302, 1988

    44 Schwarz, Norbert, "Feelings as Information: Informational and Motivational Functions of Affective States, In Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior" Guilford 527-561, 1990

    45 Schwarz, Norbert, "Feelings and Phenomenal Experiences, In Handbook of Social Cognition" Erlbaum 433-465, 1996

    46 Han, Seunghee, "Feelings and Consumer Decision Making: The Appraisal-Tendency Framework" 17 (17): 158-168, 2007

    47 Hong, Jiewen, "Feeling Mixed but Not Torn: The Moderating Role of Construal Level in Mixed Emotions Appeals" 37 (37): 456-472, 2010

    48 Lerner, Jenifer S., "Fear, Anger, and Risk" 81 (81): 146-159, 2001

    49 Elster, Jon, "Emotions and Economic Theory" 36 (36): 47-74, 1998

    50 Leone, Luigi, "Emotions and Decision Making: Regulatory Focus Moderates the Influence of Anticipated Emotions on Action Evaluations" 19 (19): 1175-1198, 2005

    51 Higgins, E. Tory, "Emotional Responses to Goal Attainment: Strength of Regulatory Focus as a Moderator" 72 (72): 515-525, 1997

    52 Laros, Fleur J. M., "Emotion in Consumer Behavior: A Hierarchical Approach" 58 (58): 1437-1445, 2005

    53 Pham, Michel T., "Emotion and Rationality: A Critical Review and Interpretation of Empirical Evidence" 11 (11): 155-178, 2007

    54 Lazarus, Richard S., "Emotion and Adaptation" Oxford University Press 1991

    55 Shaver, Phillip, "Emotion Knowledge: Further Exploration of a Prototype Approach" 52 (52): 1061-1086, 1987

    56 Idson, Lorraine C., "Distinguishing Gains from Non-losses and Losses from Non-gains: A Regulatory Focus Perspective on Hedonic Intensity" 36 (36): 252-274, 2000

    57 서은국, "Discriminant Validity of Well-Being Measures" 71 (71): 616-628, 199609

    58 Oliver, Richard L., "Cognitive, Affective, and Attribute Bases of the Satisfaction Responses" 20 (20): 418-430, 1993

    59 Heitmann, Mark, "Choice Goal Attainment and Decision and Consumption Satisfaction" 44 (44): 234-250, 2007

    60 Peter, J. Paul, "Caution in the Use of Difference Scores in Consumer Research" 19 (19): 655-662, 1993

    61 Watson, Lisa, "Causes and Consequences of Emotions on Consumer Behaviour: A Review and Integrative Cognitive Appraisal Theory" 41 (41): 487-511, 2007

    62 Larsen, Jeff T., "Can People Feel Happy and Sad at the Same Time" 81 (81): 684-696, 2001

    63 William, Patti, "Can Mixed Emotions Peacefully Coexist" 28 (28): 636-649, 2002

    64 Johnson, Joseph, "Blowing Bubbles: Heuristics and Biases in the Run-Up of Stock Prices" 33 (33): 486-503, 2005

    65 Lerner, Jenifer S., "Beyond Valence: Toward a Model of Emotion-Specific Influences on Judgment and Choice" 14 (14): 473-493, 2000

    66 Zeelenberg, Marcel, "Beyond Valence in Customer Dissatisfaction: A Review and New Findings on Behavioral Responses to Regret and Disappointment in Failed Services" 57 (57): 445-455, 2004

    67 Keltner, Dacher, "Beyond Simple Pessimism: Effects of Sadness and Anger on Social Perception" 64 (64): 740-752, 1993

    68 Higgins, E. Tory, "Beyond Pleasure and Pain" 52 (52): 1280-1300, 1997

    69 Strauman, Timothy J., "Automatic Activation of Self-Discrepancies and Emotional Syndromes: When Cognitive Structures Influence Affect" 53 (53): 1004-1014, 1987

    70 Förster, Jens, "Approach and Avoidance Strength During Goal Attainment: Regulatory Focus and the ”Goal Looms Larger” Effect" 75 (75): 1115-1131, 1998

    71 Raghunathan, Rajagopal, "All Negative Moods Are Not Equal: Motivational Influences of Anxiety and Sadness on Decision Making" 79 (79): 56-77, 1999

    72 Tversky, Amos, "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty" 5 (5): 297-323, 1992

    73 Higgins, E. Tory, "Achievement Orientations from Subjective Histories of Success: Promotion Pride versus Prevention Pride" 31 (31): 3-23, 2001

    74 Nyer, Prashanth U., "A Study of the Relationships Between Cognitive Appraisals and Consumption Emotions" 25 (25): 296-304, 1997

    75 Yi, Youjae, "A Critical Review of Consumer Satisfaction, In Review of Marketing 1990" American Marketing Association 68-123, 1990

    76 Oliver, Richard L., "A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decision" 17 (17): 460-469, 1980

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼