RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    모욕죄의 위헌성과 친고죄 조항의 폐지에 대한 정책적 고찰 = The Unconstitutionality of Insult Laws and Cyber-Insult Laws

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76544831

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In 2008, the Korean government and the ruling party proposed a bill to enhance the crime of insult in two ways: (1) enhance the punishment to up to 2 years of imprisonment and (2) eliminate the requirement that the victim file an accusation thereby allow the police and prosecutor to prosecute insulting comments even if the supposed victim does not come forward first. In this article, the author argues that the existing criminal law of insult is unconstitutional and falls miserably off the international human rights standards, and that any attempt to enhance it should therefore be aborted. Insult is punishment on expression of one`s opinions and feelings on account of an insulting feeling that it causes on others. However, opinions and feelings are valuable part of speech which should be constitutionally protected. Narrowing the scope of insult to `bad language` does not relieve its unconstitutionality because it is not the text of the expression that causes the stress on the hearer but the context in which the expression was made. Major elements of this context are the relative social status of the speaker and hearer, and the hearer`s sense of self-worth, which in no way can be a constitutionally acceptable basis for punishing the speaker who does not have any control over those elements. The author notices that general insult law exists only in Germany, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan and the insult-against-the-head-of-state laws are retained only by authoritarian regimes who are continuously pressured by international bodies to abolish them. The author proposes instead adoption of hate crime laws, which most developed countries adopted instead of enhancing the already unconstitutional law of insult.
    번역하기

    In 2008, the Korean government and the ruling party proposed a bill to enhance the crime of insult in two ways: (1) enhance the punishment to up to 2 years of imprisonment and (2) eliminate the requirement that the victim file an accusation thereby al...

    In 2008, the Korean government and the ruling party proposed a bill to enhance the crime of insult in two ways: (1) enhance the punishment to up to 2 years of imprisonment and (2) eliminate the requirement that the victim file an accusation thereby allow the police and prosecutor to prosecute insulting comments even if the supposed victim does not come forward first. In this article, the author argues that the existing criminal law of insult is unconstitutional and falls miserably off the international human rights standards, and that any attempt to enhance it should therefore be aborted. Insult is punishment on expression of one`s opinions and feelings on account of an insulting feeling that it causes on others. However, opinions and feelings are valuable part of speech which should be constitutionally protected. Narrowing the scope of insult to `bad language` does not relieve its unconstitutionality because it is not the text of the expression that causes the stress on the hearer but the context in which the expression was made. Major elements of this context are the relative social status of the speaker and hearer, and the hearer`s sense of self-worth, which in no way can be a constitutionally acceptable basis for punishing the speaker who does not have any control over those elements. The author notices that general insult law exists only in Germany, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan and the insult-against-the-head-of-state laws are retained only by authoritarian regimes who are continuously pressured by international bodies to abolish them. The author proposes instead adoption of hate crime laws, which most developed countries adopted instead of enhancing the already unconstitutional law of insult.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 R. v. Zundel, 2 : 731-, 1992

    2 박경신, "사진으로 보는 저작권 초상권 상표권 기타등등"

    3 양동철, "사이버폭력에 대한 입법방향 연구" 법조협회 55 (55): 134-173, 2006

    4 박대령, "사이버모욕죄에 대한 심리학적 접근" (37) : 2009

    5 김정진, "사이버모욕죄, 입법의 의도가 의심된다" 2009

    6 박혜진, "사이버모욕죄 도입에 대한 비판적 검토" 안암법학회 (28) : 315-348, 2009

    7 금태섭, "사이버 모욕죄의 법리상 문제점" 2009

    8 "사이버 모욕죄 관련조사"

    9 "문재완 2008년 11월 13일 법무부 법조언론인클럽 토론회 발표문"

    10 박경신, "명예훼손 형사처벌 폐지해야"

    1 R. v. Zundel, 2 : 731-, 1992

    2 박경신, "사진으로 보는 저작권 초상권 상표권 기타등등"

    3 양동철, "사이버폭력에 대한 입법방향 연구" 법조협회 55 (55): 134-173, 2006

    4 박대령, "사이버모욕죄에 대한 심리학적 접근" (37) : 2009

    5 김정진, "사이버모욕죄, 입법의 의도가 의심된다" 2009

    6 박혜진, "사이버모욕죄 도입에 대한 비판적 검토" 안암법학회 (28) : 315-348, 2009

    7 금태섭, "사이버 모욕죄의 법리상 문제점" 2009

    8 "사이버 모욕죄 관련조사"

    9 "문재완 2008년 11월 13일 법무부 법조언론인클럽 토론회 발표문"

    10 박경신, "명예훼손 형사처벌 폐지해야"

    11 조수진, "국회 내 사이버 모욕죄 도입 논의에 대한 비판적 검토" 2009

    12 Marilyn J. Greene, "It's A Crime: How Insult Laws Stifle Press Freedom"

    13 James H. Ottaway, Jr, "Insult Laws: An Insult to Freedom"

    14 James Q. Whitman, "Enforcing Civility and Respect: Three Societies" 109 : 1279-, 2002

    15 "Defamation and ‘Insult’ : Writers React, A report from International PEN’s Writers in Prison Committee: Insult Laws in the European Union"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-06-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea Law Review KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.42 1.42 1.11
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.14 1.05 1.166 0.89
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼