RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    공기업통합에 대한 법적 고찰 - 토공과 주공의 통합논의와 관련하여 - = Legal Issue on Integration of Public Corporations

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104972469

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Korea Land Corporation (KCL) and Korea National Housing Corporation (KNHC) have been established with different purposes respectively.
    In other words,
    KLC is moving ahead to undertake new national projects of the incumbent Participatory Government and achieve the national land vision of an integrated territory in the 21st century regarding them as its ultimate goal of management. At the same time, KLC has set the long-term vision of becoming “World Best Land Service Company” beloved by the nation and customers as the foundation of corporate management, and under the vision, the efforts to establish mid/long-term management strategies have been made.
    The purpose of KNHC is to improve public welfare and security of the lives of the people by constructing and providing the houses. Moreover, it also attempts to manage and improve the conditions of the old houses. Therefore, the two corporations should develop themselves by securing the specialities in their area and should contribute themselves for the security and development of the people.
    Because of the differences of their purposes and the nature and contents of their works, the attempt to integrate the two corporations forcefully is not desirable.
    This paper introduces the legal theory and statistics which are against the discussions on the integration of the two corporations and hopes that the two will further develop themselves on the basic of theirs specialities respectively.
    번역하기

    Korea Land Corporation (KCL) and Korea National Housing Corporation (KNHC) have been established with different purposes respectively. In other words, KLC is moving ahead to undertake new national projects of the incumbent Participatory Government and...

    Korea Land Corporation (KCL) and Korea National Housing Corporation (KNHC) have been established with different purposes respectively.
    In other words,
    KLC is moving ahead to undertake new national projects of the incumbent Participatory Government and achieve the national land vision of an integrated territory in the 21st century regarding them as its ultimate goal of management. At the same time, KLC has set the long-term vision of becoming “World Best Land Service Company” beloved by the nation and customers as the foundation of corporate management, and under the vision, the efforts to establish mid/long-term management strategies have been made.
    The purpose of KNHC is to improve public welfare and security of the lives of the people by constructing and providing the houses. Moreover, it also attempts to manage and improve the conditions of the old houses. Therefore, the two corporations should develop themselves by securing the specialities in their area and should contribute themselves for the security and development of the people.
    Because of the differences of their purposes and the nature and contents of their works, the attempt to integrate the two corporations forcefully is not desirable.
    This paper introduces the legal theory and statistics which are against the discussions on the integration of the two corporations and hopes that the two will further develop themselves on the basic of theirs specialities respectively.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Korea Land Corporation (KCL) and Korea National Housing Corporation (KNHC) have been established with different purposes respectively.
    In other words,
    KLC is moving ahead to undertake new national projects of the incumbent Participatory Government and achieve the national land vision of an integrated territory in the 21st century regarding them as its ultimate goal of management. At the same time, KLC has set the long-term vision of becoming “World Best Land Service Company” beloved by the nation and customers as the foundation of corporate management, and under the vision, the efforts to establish mid/long-term management strategies have been made.
    The purpose of KNHC is to improve public welfare and security of the lives of the people by constructing and providing the houses. Moreover, it also attempts to manage and improve the conditions of the old houses. Therefore, the two corporations should develop themselves by securing the specialities in their area and should contribute themselves for the security and development of the people.
    Because of the differences of their purposes and the nature and contents of their works, the attempt to integrate the two corporations forcefully is not desirable.
    This paper introduces the legal theory and statistics which are against the discussions on the integration of the two corporations and hopes that the two will further develop themselves on the basic of theirs specialities respectively.
    번역하기

    Korea Land Corporation (KCL) and Korea National Housing Corporation (KNHC) have been established with different purposes respectively. In other words, KLC is moving ahead to undertake new national projects of the incumbent Participatory Government a...

    Korea Land Corporation (KCL) and Korea National Housing Corporation (KNHC) have been established with different purposes respectively.
    In other words,
    KLC is moving ahead to undertake new national projects of the incumbent Participatory Government and achieve the national land vision of an integrated territory in the 21st century regarding them as its ultimate goal of management. At the same time, KLC has set the long-term vision of becoming “World Best Land Service Company” beloved by the nation and customers as the foundation of corporate management, and under the vision, the efforts to establish mid/long-term management strategies have been made.
    The purpose of KNHC is to improve public welfare and security of the lives of the people by constructing and providing the houses. Moreover, it also attempts to manage and improve the conditions of the old houses. Therefore, the two corporations should develop themselves by securing the specialities in their area and should contribute themselves for the security and development of the people.
    Because of the differences of their purposes and the nature and contents of their works, the attempt to integrate the two corporations forcefully is not desirable.
    This paper introduces the legal theory and statistics which are against the discussions on the integration of the two corporations and hopes that the two will further develop themselves on the basic of theirs specialities respectively.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김철수, "헌법학개론" 박영사 2007

    2 홍정선, "행정법특강" 박영사 2007

    3 장태주, "행정법개론" 현암사 2007

    4 박균성, "행정법강의" 박영사 2007

    5 김남철, "토공?주공의 통합에 대한 공법적문제" 12 : 2001

    6 한국토지공사, "토공?주공 통합논의 Q & A"

    7 한국토지공사, "토공?주공 통합 부당성"

    8 김현, "주공?토공통합에 관한 공법적검토" 12 : 2001

    9 장교식, "주공?토공 통합정책에 관한 법적검토" 12 : 2001

    10 대한주택공사, "주공?토공 통합관련 - 토공주장에 대한 주공의 견해"

    1 김철수, "헌법학개론" 박영사 2007

    2 홍정선, "행정법특강" 박영사 2007

    3 장태주, "행정법개론" 현암사 2007

    4 박균성, "행정법강의" 박영사 2007

    5 김남철, "토공?주공의 통합에 대한 공법적문제" 12 : 2001

    6 한국토지공사, "토공?주공 통합논의 Q & A"

    7 한국토지공사, "토공?주공 통합 부당성"

    8 김현, "주공?토공통합에 관한 공법적검토" 12 : 2001

    9 장교식, "주공?토공 통합정책에 관한 법적검토" 12 : 2001

    10 대한주택공사, "주공?토공 통합관련 - 토공주장에 대한 주공의 견해"

    11 대한주택공사, "주공?토공 왜 통합해야하는가"

    12 대한주택공사노동조합, "조합주요활동보고"

    13 석종현, "정부의 토공?주공 통합 정책에 관한 법적검토" 12 : 2001

    14 한국토지공사, "새정부 정책구현을 위한 토지공사의 역할과 개혁방안"

    15 이원우, "민영화에 대한 법적논의의 기초" 한림법학 포럼 1998

    16 이동수, "미국 행정법상 행정의 민영화" 32 (32): 2004

    17 곽창규, "공기업 구조조정의 바람직한 방향" 12 : 2001

    18 이광윤, "공기업 구조조정에 있어서 선결문제" 12 : 2001

    19 Freeman J., "“The Private Role in Public Governance”, 75New York L. Rev.(2000)"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.84 0.84 0.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.69 0.69 0.687 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼