RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    정부 지역산업진흥사업의 투자효과 분석 연구 = 울산지역 사례를 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99723857

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This research aims to find out the outcomes of government’s local industrial development policy using a case study of Ulsan metropolitan area, which we consider a growth pole of South East Korea. Analyzing a survey research on every local firm which participated in the government programs during the period, between 2008 and 2010, we could find that government’s policy produced some positive outcomes in areas of research activities of the firms, such as more active R&D investments, building new R&D facilities, hiring more R&D workforce, more commercialization research of technology, etc. This means that government’s subsidy for local firms worked effectively as a catalyst for innovation of the firms. Nevertheless, these growing research activities induced by government subsidy have yet resulted in the firm’s increase in sales and labor forces. Our correlation analysis shows that government policy has little impact on employment growth of the firms. In other words, government’s local industrial development policy has yet impacted on job creation, in spite of their positive impacts on R&D activities of the firms. In order to increase their impact on productivity and employment, our research suggests three implications: improving a delivery system of government subsidy for target firms, such as proper services at proper places; providing more services in areas of firm location and expansion; providing more services for workforce development so that the growth in firm’s sales result in job creation.
    번역하기

    This research aims to find out the outcomes of government’s local industrial development policy using a case study of Ulsan metropolitan area, which we consider a growth pole of South East Korea. Analyzing a survey research on every local firm which...

    This research aims to find out the outcomes of government’s local industrial development policy using a case study of Ulsan metropolitan area, which we consider a growth pole of South East Korea. Analyzing a survey research on every local firm which participated in the government programs during the period, between 2008 and 2010, we could find that government’s policy produced some positive outcomes in areas of research activities of the firms, such as more active R&D investments, building new R&D facilities, hiring more R&D workforce, more commercialization research of technology, etc. This means that government’s subsidy for local firms worked effectively as a catalyst for innovation of the firms. Nevertheless, these growing research activities induced by government subsidy have yet resulted in the firm’s increase in sales and labor forces. Our correlation analysis shows that government policy has little impact on employment growth of the firms. In other words, government’s local industrial development policy has yet impacted on job creation, in spite of their positive impacts on R&D activities of the firms. In order to increase their impact on productivity and employment, our research suggests three implications: improving a delivery system of government subsidy for target firms, such as proper services at proper places; providing more services in areas of firm location and expansion; providing more services for workforce development so that the growth in firm’s sales result in job creation.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼