RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    부산시 도심·레저형해수욕장의 배리어프리 분석 연구 : BF 인증지표를 중심으로 = Analysis barrier-free of downtown·leisure beach in Busan

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12343408

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently, a lot of efforts are exerted to establish barrier-free (BF) environment where people with mobility handicaps can access, use, and move to the various urban facilities freely in a safe manner.
    The Korean government established ‘Certification System for Barrier-Free Environment’ in 2007 in order to get more social attention with respect to establishment of the environment. However, the quantitative evaluation of appropriateness of BF certification indices is still insufficient.
    Among diverse urban facilities of Busan metropolitan city, this study targeted three famous beaches located near downtown (Gwangan-ri, Song-do, and Haeundae), which are being utilized as recreational and leisure spaces for a variety of visitors. And current situations of the beaches for the purpose of establishment of BF environment were investigated, and then the priorities of improvement factors were elicited.
    The results of this study are as follows:
    The surveyed scores of BF environment certification factors: 33 points in Gwangan-ri 36 points and 41 points in Song-do and Haeundae respectively showing they did not reach even the average level (70~80 points) which was the lowest grade of BF certification. Thus, an aggressive measure for further improvement of each factor was necessary.
    The results from Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) questionnaire about the improvement factors in the aspect of enhancement of satisfaction, and the priorities of improvement thereof targeting BF experts revealed the importance of each factor in the following order: intermediate facility (33 points); hygiene and sanitary facility (19 points); continuity of BF walk (17 points); guiding and information facility (16 points); convenience facility (15 points). Accordingly, the research results indicated that the standards as provided by the existing BF certification system, i.e. hygiene and sanitary facility (30 points), continuity of BF walk (28 points), intermediate facility (21 points), convenience facility (14 points), and guiding and information facility (7 points) were very different from the importance the people with mobility handicaps felt about each BF factor.
    Meanwhile, the results of comparative analysis of AHP weight of BF factors which were estimated through this research, and of the mobility handicapped people’s satisfaction in each factor showed that the actual users perceived intermediate factors, such as stair gap and slope, were the most urgent improvement factors in using and accessing the facilities in the sites. To be more specific, the research results revealed that as for intermediate facility, the stair gaps for approaching the beach was most urgent problem which should have to be addressed promptly, and that as to hygiene and sanitary facility, the construction of multipurpose toilet, which could be used by the disabled, the elderly, and infirm, in terms of ‘responding method according to the type of disabled’ was required most urgently. And that as for continuity of BF walk, the urgent problem was the slope of sidewalk inside the beach, and that as to the guiding and information facility, establishment of information board and guiding facility as an integrated information facility for deaf and blind people was the top priority. Also that, regarding convenience facility which takes a role as the ‘main entrance of the park facilities,’ the most urgent thing was to build a path which would enable people to make horizontal approach thereto without trouble of stair gap.
    This study was focused on drawing out the importance of factors in order to establish the beaches located near downtown in Busan as in BF environment, and provided basic materials which would be of help in planning reorganization of the beaches as BF environment. However, it is regretful that the study hasn’t conducted economic analysis at the time of making decision on the improvement priorities, and also hasn’t produced detailed BF designs according to each beach. Therefore, further research on concrete BF designs for a specific beach should be conducted from an integrated perspective in which architecture, urban planning, and transportation plan are included.
    번역하기

    Recently, a lot of efforts are exerted to establish barrier-free (BF) environment where people with mobility handicaps can access, use, and move to the various urban facilities freely in a safe manner. The Korean government established ‘Certificat...

    Recently, a lot of efforts are exerted to establish barrier-free (BF) environment where people with mobility handicaps can access, use, and move to the various urban facilities freely in a safe manner.
    The Korean government established ‘Certification System for Barrier-Free Environment’ in 2007 in order to get more social attention with respect to establishment of the environment. However, the quantitative evaluation of appropriateness of BF certification indices is still insufficient.
    Among diverse urban facilities of Busan metropolitan city, this study targeted three famous beaches located near downtown (Gwangan-ri, Song-do, and Haeundae), which are being utilized as recreational and leisure spaces for a variety of visitors. And current situations of the beaches for the purpose of establishment of BF environment were investigated, and then the priorities of improvement factors were elicited.
    The results of this study are as follows:
    The surveyed scores of BF environment certification factors: 33 points in Gwangan-ri 36 points and 41 points in Song-do and Haeundae respectively showing they did not reach even the average level (70~80 points) which was the lowest grade of BF certification. Thus, an aggressive measure for further improvement of each factor was necessary.
    The results from Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) questionnaire about the improvement factors in the aspect of enhancement of satisfaction, and the priorities of improvement thereof targeting BF experts revealed the importance of each factor in the following order: intermediate facility (33 points); hygiene and sanitary facility (19 points); continuity of BF walk (17 points); guiding and information facility (16 points); convenience facility (15 points). Accordingly, the research results indicated that the standards as provided by the existing BF certification system, i.e. hygiene and sanitary facility (30 points), continuity of BF walk (28 points), intermediate facility (21 points), convenience facility (14 points), and guiding and information facility (7 points) were very different from the importance the people with mobility handicaps felt about each BF factor.
    Meanwhile, the results of comparative analysis of AHP weight of BF factors which were estimated through this research, and of the mobility handicapped people’s satisfaction in each factor showed that the actual users perceived intermediate factors, such as stair gap and slope, were the most urgent improvement factors in using and accessing the facilities in the sites. To be more specific, the research results revealed that as for intermediate facility, the stair gaps for approaching the beach was most urgent problem which should have to be addressed promptly, and that as to hygiene and sanitary facility, the construction of multipurpose toilet, which could be used by the disabled, the elderly, and infirm, in terms of ‘responding method according to the type of disabled’ was required most urgently. And that as for continuity of BF walk, the urgent problem was the slope of sidewalk inside the beach, and that as to the guiding and information facility, establishment of information board and guiding facility as an integrated information facility for deaf and blind people was the top priority. Also that, regarding convenience facility which takes a role as the ‘main entrance of the park facilities,’ the most urgent thing was to build a path which would enable people to make horizontal approach thereto without trouble of stair gap.
    This study was focused on drawing out the importance of factors in order to establish the beaches located near downtown in Busan as in BF environment, and provided basic materials which would be of help in planning reorganization of the beaches as BF environment. However, it is regretful that the study hasn’t conducted economic analysis at the time of making decision on the improvement priorities, and also hasn’t produced detailed BF designs according to each beach. Therefore, further research on concrete BF designs for a specific beach should be conducted from an integrated perspective in which architecture, urban planning, and transportation plan are included.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구 배경 및 목적 1
    • 1-1. 연구 배경 1
    • 1-2. 연구 목적 3
    • 2. 연구 동향 4
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구 배경 및 목적 1
    • 1-1. 연구 배경 1
    • 1-2. 연구 목적 3
    • 2. 연구 동향 4
    • 2-1. BF 연구 동향 4
    • 2-2. 기존 연구의 한계 및 의의 6
    • 3. 연구 범위 및 방법 6
    • 3-1. 연구 범위 6
    • 3-2 연구 방법 8
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰 10
    • 1. BF의 정의 10
    • 2. BF추진체계 및 사례 12
    • 2-1. 국내 12
    • 2-2. 국외 - 일본 24
    • 3. 소결 36
    • Ⅲ. 사례 연구 39
    • 1. 조사개요 39
    • 2. 해수욕장 별 시설현황 45
    • 2-1. 해수욕장 전체 시설현황(종합) 46
    • 2-2. 광안리 해수욕장 47
    • 2-3. 송도 해수욕장 55
    • 2-4. 해운대 해수욕장 62
    • 3. BF측면 도심레저형 해수욕장 개선요소 우선순위 70
    • 3-1. BF 환경 조성의 중요도 분석 70
    • 3-2. BF 환경 조성의 만족도 분석 74
    • 3-3. BF측면 도심레저형 해수욕장 개선요소 우선순위 도출 76
    • Ⅳ. 결론 및 시사점 78
    • 1. 결론 78
    • 2. 시사점 80
    • 참고문헌 84
    • ABSTRACT 86
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼