RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    독일 공영 텔레비전 방송사 ZDF의 온라인 저널리즘 = 온라인 서비스 특성, 전략에 대한 실증 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76210115

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    How have been effected the TV broadcasters by development of Internet and what were their strategic reactions against challenge of Internet? This paper attempts answer for these questions with a case study of ZDF, one of the Germans public broadcasters. I analyzed strategies, actual conditions, and environmental qualities of ZDF's Internet service through interview and participant observation as qualitative methods. I purposed to contribute for korean studies about ‘online journalism of broadcasters’ and ‘relationship between internet and TV’ and to find current issues given by Germans case in . this paper. On my research, ZDF started online service in 1996. They strategically targeted to supply high-qualified contents using enormous data stored by TV broadcasting. Then it seems that their attempts provoke positive affect to differentiation with other competitors including private broadcasters. ZDF, meanwhile, didn't make any expansion this Internet business to profitable one due to the forth amendment of national broadcasting law : that banned advertisement and sponsorship of public broadcaster. At present, finance completely depends on TV subscription fee. It appeared that ZDF has developed interrelationship between Internet and TV into companionable complement relationship through their Internet service. ZDF's case study suggests the necessity to reconsider of position and duty on public broadcaster in Internet division in Korea.
    번역하기

    How have been effected the TV broadcasters by development of Internet and what were their strategic reactions against challenge of Internet? This paper attempts answer for these questions with a case study of ZDF, one of the Germans public broadcaster...

    How have been effected the TV broadcasters by development of Internet and what were their strategic reactions against challenge of Internet? This paper attempts answer for these questions with a case study of ZDF, one of the Germans public broadcasters. I analyzed strategies, actual conditions, and environmental qualities of ZDF's Internet service through interview and participant observation as qualitative methods. I purposed to contribute for korean studies about ‘online journalism of broadcasters’ and ‘relationship between internet and TV’ and to find current issues given by Germans case in . this paper. On my research, ZDF started online service in 1996. They strategically targeted to supply high-qualified contents using enormous data stored by TV broadcasting. Then it seems that their attempts provoke positive affect to differentiation with other competitors including private broadcasters. ZDF, meanwhile, didn't make any expansion this Internet business to profitable one due to the forth amendment of national broadcasting law : that banned advertisement and sponsorship of public broadcaster. At present, finance completely depends on TV subscription fee. It appeared that ZDF has developed interrelationship between Internet and TV into companionable complement relationship through their Internet service. ZDF's case study suggests the necessity to reconsider of position and duty on public broadcaster in Internet division in Korea.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.75 1.75 1.94
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.07 2.11 2.773 0.4
    더보기
    해외이동버튼