RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    온실가스 감축의무 협상동향 및 대응방향 연구 III = Climate Change Negotiations for the Post-Kyoto Regime -Key Issues and Implications III

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102027045

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study analyzes the climate change negotiations currently taking place at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) conferences, reviews recent research papers related to the key agenda issues of the conferences, and evaluates legislations and policies of major countries on climate change, including the USA, to answer how Korea can function effectively in the climate change negotiations arena. In 2011, a series of four UNFCCC conferences, including the 17th Conference of the Parties (COP17) in Durban, South Africa, were held to reach agreements on the Post-Kyoto regime. In spite of the wide division between the Parties` stances, particularly between developed and developing countries, the Durban package including the Decisions for the establishment of the Durban Platform, the Green Climate Fund, the outcome of the AWG-LCA, and the outcome of the AWG-KP was eventually produced. Based on the outcomes of Durban COP 17, Korea may consider the following: First, it must search for ways to differentiate the commitments and actions of developed and developing country Parties within the single integrated framework beginning from 2020 based on the UNFCCC principle of the common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities and developed countries` historical responsibility. Second, it would be important for Korea to be grouped with other major developing countries, such as China and India, since less action on the part of those countries would have great economic impacts on Korea. Third, Korea must find ways to actively participate in the development and revision process of the MRV guidelines because the negotiation will continue to focus on the enhancement of transparency and confidence-building. Fourth, Korea could consider increasing its financial contributions to climate finance as an advanced developing country and the one that wishes to host the Green Climate Fund in Korea.
    번역하기

    This study analyzes the climate change negotiations currently taking place at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) conferences, reviews recent research papers related to the key agenda issues of the conferences, and evalu...

    This study analyzes the climate change negotiations currently taking place at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) conferences, reviews recent research papers related to the key agenda issues of the conferences, and evaluates legislations and policies of major countries on climate change, including the USA, to answer how Korea can function effectively in the climate change negotiations arena. In 2011, a series of four UNFCCC conferences, including the 17th Conference of the Parties (COP17) in Durban, South Africa, were held to reach agreements on the Post-Kyoto regime. In spite of the wide division between the Parties` stances, particularly between developed and developing countries, the Durban package including the Decisions for the establishment of the Durban Platform, the Green Climate Fund, the outcome of the AWG-LCA, and the outcome of the AWG-KP was eventually produced. Based on the outcomes of Durban COP 17, Korea may consider the following: First, it must search for ways to differentiate the commitments and actions of developed and developing country Parties within the single integrated framework beginning from 2020 based on the UNFCCC principle of the common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities and developed countries` historical responsibility. Second, it would be important for Korea to be grouped with other major developing countries, such as China and India, since less action on the part of those countries would have great economic impacts on Korea. Third, Korea must find ways to actively participate in the development and revision process of the MRV guidelines because the negotiation will continue to focus on the enhancement of transparency and confidence-building. Fourth, Korea could consider increasing its financial contributions to climate finance as an advanced developing country and the one that wishes to host the Green Climate Fund in Korea.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼