해방기의 지역문학론 -파성 설창수를 중심으로 = Theory of regional literature in period of Korean liberation -focusing on Seol, Chang-Soo

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper discussed the characteristics of regional literature during the period of Korean liberation by focusing on the theory of regional literature from Seol, Chang-Soo. Regional literature for the liberation period shows the paradoxical nature of a mismatch between the claims and the results. Left-wing or North Korea emphasized the spread of the ``local culture``, but this rather strengthened the control of the central area over the regions. <Eung-Hyang> event was the representative case. Right wing gave little attention to the literature of the region, and at this point, it was possible indigenous and distinctive literature was born. Nevertheless, as the left-wing and right-wing`s ethnic literary discourse during the liberation period regarded the nation/ethnic, a single and universal unit as its premise, the uniqueness of local literature was not the target of interest. The ``local literature`` could be great interest for the regions in the nature of ``local`` literature, but for the center, it was not the problem to be concerned. In this situation, The activities of Paseong Seol, Chang-Soo are one of the most valuable cases in the study of the local literature during the liberation time. He did many activities mostly in Jinju area in Kyungnam province during liberation, stressing the necessity of regional literature and showed a variety of activities for the establishment of a regional literature in conjunction. In comparison that the literature movement of other regions in this time didn`t show a significant theoretical deployment for the purpose and the way to establish local literature, Seol, Chang-Soo`s effort has meaning as an example representing the theory of local literature in the liberation period as well as establishing the local literature only in Jinju area. He reasoned the regional literature in the dimension of the national literature and his view of whole-person literature defined ``whole-person`` as one thing including the ethnic, humanity and divinity and organically connected the individual with the collective and the integral part with the whole. It was a theory of literature avoiding purity and claiming ``JunSunChamHoik`` in the opposite position of the national literature of ChungMoonHyup. Ironically, there shows similarity in many parts between his literary movement and theory and the theory of left wing and North Korea. 5 monolithic (Trinity or one body) principals which are tendency Trinity, literature-bureaucracy Trinity, literature-people Trinity, literature-Study Trinity and literature-construction Trinity, has similar way of practicing and its goal to the ones of establishing the national literature whose premises are the close link between the center and the left wing`s regional organizations, the bureaucratization and politicization of literary persons, popularization of the art and literature and establishment of a nation-state. The problem was his theory of whole-person literature``. The literature had to be closely linked to the overall environment, systems and all that surround it with an emphasis on practical aspects as long as it claims ``Monolithic body``. As any extension of the one body expanded, the literary theory of Seol, Chang-Soo and the left wing came to show some aspects similar to each other. In addition, it is still doubtful that the literary theory comprehensive of humanity and the gods could be the national literary theory.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이선영, "현대문학비평자료집" 태학사 1993

2 장상환, "해방직후 진주지역의 정치변동" 경남사학회 1995

3 박정선, "해방기 조선문학가동맹의 문화대중화 담론과 조직적 실천" 한국어문학회 (93) : 2006

4 이희환, "해방기 인천의 지역문학과 매체" 영주어문학회 19 : 5-44, 2010

5 오문석, "해방기 시문학과 민족 담론의 재배치" 한국시학회 (25) : 29-49, 2009

6 박용찬, "해방기 대구 ․ 경북 지역 문학매체와 학생시단의 위상" 국어교육학회(since1969) (47) : 277-298, 2010

7 박태일, "한국지역문학의 논리" 청동거울 2004

8 박태일, "한국 근대 지역문학의 발견과 파성 설창수" 한국민족문화연구소 (1) : 223-258, 2009

9 박민규, "조선문학가동맹 ‘詩部’의 시 대중화 운동과 시론" 한국시학회 (33) : 183-217, 2012

10 "자유민보"

11 "영문"

12 "영남문학"

13 "연합신문"

14 김봉희, "설창수 문학의 이해" 경진 2011

15 "서울신문"

16 신형기, "북한문학사" 평민사 2000

17 권보드래, "민족문학과 한국문학" 민족문학사학회 (44) : 197-234, 2010

18 "문학"

19 "동아일보"

20 이순욱, "광복기 경남·부산 시인들의 문단 재편 욕망과 해방 1주년 기념시집 『날개』" 한국비평문학회 (43) : 189-226, 2012

21 송창우, "경남지역 문예지 연구" 慶南大學校 大學院 1996

22 유재천, "경남의 시인들 1" 박이정 2005

23 "건설기의 조선문학"

24 오태호, "『응향』결정서’를 둘러싼 해방기 문단의 인식론적 차이 연구" 중앙어문학회 (48) : 37-64, 2011

25 김한식, "『백민』과 민족문학－ 해방 후 우익 문단의 형성" 상허학회 20 : 146-168, 2007

26 김재용, "[단행본] 북한 문학의 역사적 이해" 문학과지성사; 서울 1994

27 김현정, "1940년대 후반 대전지역 문학 연구" 어문연구학회 71 : 305-329, 2012