RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      도시는 지구환경의 지속가능성에 기여할 수 있는가? - 앤드류 라이트(Andrew Light)의 주장을 중심으로 - = Can Cities Contribute to Global Environmental Sustainability? - Centered on the Argument of Andrew Light -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109489002

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      American environmental philosopher Andrew Light argues that cities can make a positive contribution to the sustainability of the global environment. His argument is based on two points. One is that nature experience education in cities can have just as positive an effect as eco-education outside of cities, and the other is that living in cities requires less energy than living in rural or wilderness areas. However, there are many scholars who disagree with Andrew Light's argument.
      The core of their argument is that cities are more of a hindrance than a contributor to the sustainability of the global environment. According to these scholars, cities are unsustainable without outside help. They argue that few cities are able to provide essential resources such as energy, food, water, and even waste disposal without relying on other cities to do so. The purpose of this study is to first examine the pro and con positions on this issue of “urban impact on the global environment,” then to identify the evidence behind those positions, and finally to explore ways to compromise between the two positions.
      번역하기

      American environmental philosopher Andrew Light argues that cities can make a positive contribution to the sustainability of the global environment. His argument is based on two points. One is that nature experience education in cities can have just a...

      American environmental philosopher Andrew Light argues that cities can make a positive contribution to the sustainability of the global environment. His argument is based on two points. One is that nature experience education in cities can have just as positive an effect as eco-education outside of cities, and the other is that living in cities requires less energy than living in rural or wilderness areas. However, there are many scholars who disagree with Andrew Light's argument.
      The core of their argument is that cities are more of a hindrance than a contributor to the sustainability of the global environment. According to these scholars, cities are unsustainable without outside help. They argue that few cities are able to provide essential resources such as energy, food, water, and even waste disposal without relying on other cities to do so. The purpose of this study is to first examine the pro and con positions on this issue of “urban impact on the global environment,” then to identify the evidence behind those positions, and finally to explore ways to compromise between the two positions.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼