A dispute between Zhu Xi(朱熹) and Lu Jiuyuan(陸九淵) is important on Neo-confucianism`s development. The dispute causing from difference between Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan`s Philosophy had effected Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan`s each school`s philosophical ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101944937
2016
-
100
KCI등재
학술저널
203-232(30쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
A dispute between Zhu Xi(朱熹) and Lu Jiuyuan(陸九淵) is important on Neo-confucianism`s development. The dispute causing from difference between Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan`s Philosophy had effected Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan`s each school`s philosophical ...
A dispute between Zhu Xi(朱熹) and Lu Jiuyuan(陸九淵) is important on Neo-confucianism`s development. The dispute causing from difference between Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan`s Philosophy had effected Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan`s each school`s philosophical dispute. From Song dynasty to Ming Dynasty`s most philosophers continuous disputed about Same & Difference on Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan`s Philosophy, but did not appreciate it because of school`s prejudice. On Qingdynasty, there appeared philosophers being free or less from school`s prejudice. They looked at Same & Difference on Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan`s philosophy objectively. Wangmaohong deny all The appreciation of Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan’s Philosophy surrounding The Dispute about Same & Difference on Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyian’s Philosophy, including traditional scholars of Appreciation of Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan`s Philosophy, and claimed Zhuxi and Lujiuyuan was equipped with a completely different system from beginning to end. Wangmaohong’s Appreciation of Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan’s Philosophy is so can be seen through Zhuzinianpu. This book is a masterpiece of his lifetime that can be evaluated as to complete the comprehensive Zhuzixue. He is focused through a Zhuzinianpu identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the existing Zhuzinianpu, complete the zhuzixue through extensive modifications and at the same time attack luwangxue, particularly about zhuziwanniandinglun.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 임홍태, "李紱의 朱陸觀 연구― 『주자만년전론』을 중심으로 ―" 한국철학사연구회 (37) : 159-195, 2013
2 焦糖, "雕菰樓集" 台北 鼎文書局 1977
3 王懋紘, "白田草堂存稿" 文海出版社 1968
4 朴慶彰, "王懋竑的朱子學" 國立中山大學中國文學系 1989
5 徐世昌, "清儒學案" 中華書局 2008
6 張舜徽, "淸代揚州學記" 華中師范大学出版社 2005
7 陸寳千, "淸代思想史" 廣文書局 1978
8 劉枚, "歴代人物年譜的檢索" 128 (128): 2012
9 永培 等奉勅, "欽定四庫全書總目" 1926
10 黃進興, "李紱與淸代陸王學派" 江蘇教育出版社 2010
1 임홍태, "李紱의 朱陸觀 연구― 『주자만년전론』을 중심으로 ―" 한국철학사연구회 (37) : 159-195, 2013
2 焦糖, "雕菰樓集" 台北 鼎文書局 1977
3 王懋紘, "白田草堂存稿" 文海出版社 1968
4 朴慶彰, "王懋竑的朱子學" 國立中山大學中國文學系 1989
5 徐世昌, "清儒學案" 中華書局 2008
6 張舜徽, "淸代揚州學記" 華中師范大学出版社 2005
7 陸寳千, "淸代思想史" 廣文書局 1978
8 劉枚, "歴代人物年譜的檢索" 128 (128): 2012
9 永培 等奉勅, "欽定四庫全書總目" 1926
10 黃進興, "李紱與淸代陸王學派" 江蘇教育出版社 2010
11 吳長庚, "朱陸學術考辨五種" 江西高校出版社 2000
12 朱熹, "朱熹氣" 四川教育出版社 1996
13 束景南, "朱熹年譜長篇" 華東師範大學出版社 2001
14 陳榮捷, "朱學論集" 臺灣學生書局 1982
15 李紱, "朱子晩年全論" 中華書局 2000
16 王懋紘, "朱子年譜" 中華書局 1998
17 劉述先, "朱子哲學思想的發展與完成" 臺灣學生書局 1984
18 顧廣譽, "悔過齋續集 光緒4" 1878
19 黃宗羲, "宋元學案" 中華書局 1986
20 紀昀 總纂, "四庫全書總目提要" 河北人民出版社 2000
21 李紱, "四庫全書總目" 藝文印書館 1969
22 梁啓超, "中國近三百年學術史" 東方出版社 1996
23 錢穆, "中國近三百年學術史" 商務印書館 1997
24 蔣維喬, "中國近三百年哲學史" 中華書局 1978
25 謝巍, "中國歷代人物年譜考錄" 中華書局 1992
26 續修四庫全書編纂委員會, "『穆堂初稿』·『穆堂別稿』" 上海古籍出版社 2001
지(志),의(意)(염,(念),려(慮),사(思))에 관한 율곡(栗谷)의 공부론(工夫論) 연구
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2022 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2019-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2016-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) | ![]() |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2010-06-23 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 율곡사상연구 -> 율곡학연구외국어명 : 미등록 -> JOURNAL OF YULGOK-STUDIES | ![]() |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.55 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.49 | 0.47 | 1.667 | 0.11 |